Agreement No. CE 20/2004(EP) North East
New Territories (NENT) Landfill Extension Annual Environmental Monitoring and Audit
Report (No. 1) – December 2022 to 2023 |
Contents
12 Environmental Non-conformance
13 Implementation Status on Environmental Mitigation
Measures
Figure
Location of the Project Site |
|
Impact Monitoring Locations |
|
Landfill Gas Monitoring Locations |
Appendix
Construction Programme |
|
Construction Site Activities |
|
Project Organization Chart & Management Structure |
|
Detail Status of FEP & EP Submission |
|
Graphical Presentations |
|
Notification of Environmental Quality Limits Exceedance |
|
Waste Flow Table |
|
Environmental Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS) |
|
Mitigation Measures of Cultural Landscape Features |
|
Cumulative complaint / enquiry log and Summaries of complaints |
|
Graphical Presentation for comparison between monitoring results and EIA Predictions |
Aurecon Hong Kong Limited (Aurecon) was appointed to undertake the
role of Environmental Team (ET) and carry out Environmental Monitoring and
Audit for the North East New Territories (NENT) Landfill Extension.
The
construction phase and EM&A programme of the Project commenced on 1 December
2022.
This
1st Annual EM&A Report presents the EM&A works conducted
from 1 December 2022 to 31 December 2023 in accordance with the EM&A
Manual.
Summary
of Construction Works undertaken during Report Period
The major construction works undertaken during the reporting period include:
Construction Activities
Undertaken |
Reporting Month |
|
||
Dec
2022 to Jan 2023 |
Feb
to Aug 2023 |
Sep
to Nov 2023 |
Dec
2023 |
|
- Material loading and unloading, site
traffic |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Permanent site office foundation works
with pouring of concrete |
|
✓ |
|
|
-
Construction of site buildings |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
-
Site
clearance |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
-
Installation of permanent fencing |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
-
Site
formation |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
-
Tree
felling |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Shotcreting (Permanent and Temporary) |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
Soil Nail Installation |
|
|
|
✓ |
Environmental
Exceedance
Air Quality (1-hr TSP)
No Action / Limit Level exceedance for
1-hr TSP impact monitoring at AM1, AM2 & AM3 was recorded during the
reporting period.
Air Quality (24-hr TSP)
2 Action Level Exceedance and 3 Limit
Level Exceedance for 24-hr TSP monitoring at AM1 was recorded during the
reporting period. The exceedance was considered likely caused by external
sources such as the high level of background air quality in Hong Kong during
the monitoring period etc and not project related.
No Action / Limit Level exceedance for
24-hr TSP monitoring at AM2 was recorded during the period.
4 Action Level Exceedance and 3 Limit
Level Exceedance for 24-hr TSP monitoring at AM3 was recorded during the
reporting period. The exceedance was considered likely caused by external
sources such as the high level of background air quality in Hong Kong during
the monitoring period etc and not project related.
Noise & Landfill Gas Monitoring
No exceedance of the Action and Limit
Levels were recorded at designated monitoring stations during the reporting
period.
Surface Water Quality Monitoring
No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
of surface water monitoring was recorded from December 2022 to March 2023.
No exceedance of Action Levels of surface
water monitoring was recorded from April to June 2023.
No exceedance of Limit Level of surface
water monitoring at WM1 was recorded from April to June 2023.
1 turbidity exceedance of Limit Levels of
surface water quality at WM2 was recorded from April to June 2023. After the
investigation, the exceedance may involve the construction runoff of the
project. The rectification actions are conducted by the contractor in progress.
The rectification works should be achieved minimization the potential risk of
causing high concentration of construction runoff, enhancement of maintenance
of Temporary Surface Water Drainage System (TSWDS), enhancement of the
effectiveness and treatment capacity of the TSWDS & enhancement of
temporary landscape treatment as green cover and minimization the potential
risk of causing high concentration of construction runoff.
No exceedance of the Action and Levels was
recorded at designated monitoring stations in July 2023.
1
DO exceedance of the Action Level at WM1 was recorded in August 2023. In
summary of the investigation, the DO exceedance in Action Level at WM1 may
involve the vary of temperature under the hot weather. Therefore, the
exceedance is not related to project. No exceedance of Limit Level at WM1 was
recorded in August 2023.
No
exceedance of the Action and Limit Levels at WM2 were recorded in August 2023.
No
exceedance of the Action and Levels at designated monitoring stations was
recorded from September to December 2023.
Environmental
Non-conformance/Complaint/Summons and Prosecution
1
warning regarding suspected non-compliance event with Condition 1.7 and 2.15(a)
of the EP & Condition 1.7 and 2.13(a) of the FEP-01 & FEP-02 was
recorded during the reporting period. The related rectified actions are being
taken in progress by the contractor.
6
complaints (1 complaint regarding air quality and 5 complaints regarding water
quality) were recorded during the reporting period. The related rectified
actions are conducted by the contractor as soon as possible.
No
summons/prosecutions were recorded and received in this reporting period.
1.1. Background
1.1.1. The North East New Territories Landfill Extension (the NENTX Project) is located adjacent to the existing North East New Territories (NENT) Landfill at Ta Kwu Ling. The extension site is located in a valley covering mainly the existing NENT Landfill Stockpile and Borrow Area that was formed to the east of the existing landfill as part of the original site development of the landfill, and layout plan shown in Figure 1.
1.1.2. The NENTX is a designated project. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (AEIAR-111/2007) and an Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual were approved on 20 September 2007. The project is governed by an Environmental Permit (EP) (EP-292/2007) which was granted on 26 November 2007. A further of EP (FEP) was applied and the FEP (FEP-01/292/2007) was subsequently granted on 28 April 2022. Another further of EP (FEP-02/292/2007) was subsequently granted on 23 August 2023.
1.1.3. In accordance with the requirements specified in Section 2.6 to 2.10 and Section 12.3 of the approved Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual, Annual EM&A report should be submitted to the Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) within 10 working days after the end of the reporting year. The submissions shall be certified by the Environmental Team (ET) Leader and verified by the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC).
1.1.4. The construction phase and EM&A programme of the Project commenced on 1 December 2022.
1.2. Nature, Scale and Scope of the captioned Designated Project
1.2.1 The Nature, Scale and Scope of the captioned Designated Project is presented in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1 Nature, Scale and Scope of the captioned
Designated Project
Item(s) |
Content |
Nature of
Designated Project |
Construction and operation of a landfill for waste as defined in the
“Waste Disposal Ordinance” (Cap. 354) |
Scale and Scope of Designated Project |
The Project mainly consists of the followings: - Construction and operation of a landfill extension of about 70 hectares
with a target void space of at least 19 million cubic metres on the eastern
side of the existing NENT Landfill, including the followings: -
i.
Site formation and
preparation; ii.
Installation of liner
system; iii.
Installation of
leachate collection, treatment and disposal facilities; iv.
Installation of gas
collection, utilization and management facilities; v.
Utilities provisions
and drainage diversion; vi.
Landfilling operation; vii.
Restoration and
aftercare in subsequent stages; and viii.
Measures to mitigate
environmental impacts as well as environmental monitoring and auditing to be
implemented. |
1.3. Purpose of this Report
1.3.1. This is the 1st Annual EM&A Report which summarises the impact monitoring results and audit findings for the EM&A programme during the reporting period from 01 December 2022 to 31 December 2023.
1.4.1. The structure of the report is as follows:
-
details the background, purpose and structure of the report.
Section 2 – Project Information
-
summarises background and scope of the Project, site description, project
organization and contact details, construction programme, the construction
works undertaken and the status of Environmental Permit(s)/License(s) during
the reporting period.
Section 3 – Air Quality Monitoring
Section 5 – Water Quality Monitoring
Section 6 – Waste Management
Section
7 – Landfill Gas Monitoring
Section 8 – Landscape and Visual
Section 10 – Ecological Monitoring
Section 11 – Site Inspection and Audit
Section 12 – Environmental Non-Conformance
Section 13 – Implementation Status on Environmental Mitigation Measures
Section 14 – Conclusion
2.1.1. A summary of the major construction activities undertaken in this reporting period is shown in Table 2-1. Construction programme is illustrated in Appendix A. Detailed construction activities are summarized in Appendix B.
Table 2-1 Major Construction Activities Undertaken
in the Reporting Period
Construction Activities
Undertaken |
Reporting Month |
|
||
Dec
2022 to Jan 2023 |
Feb
to Aug 2023 |
Sep
to Nov 2023 |
Dec
2023 |
|
- Material loading and unloading, site
traffic |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Permanent site office foundation works
with pouring of concrete |
|
✓ |
|
|
-
Construction of site buildings |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
-
Site
clearance |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
-
Installation of permanent fencing |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
-
Site
formation |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
-
Tree
felling |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Shotcreting (Permanent and Temporary) |
|
|
✓ |
✓ |
Soil Nail Installation |
|
|
|
✓ |
2.2. Project Organization & Management Structure
2.2.1. The Project Organization Chart & Management Structure are shown in Appendix C. The key personnel contact information is summarized in Table 2-2.
Table
2-2
Contact Information of Key
Personnel
Party |
Name |
Contact
Number |
Contractor (Veolia Hong Kong Holding Ltd.) |
Mr. Matt Choy |
2902 5296 |
Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) (Meinhardt Infrastructure
and Environment Ltd.) |
Ms. Claudine Lee |
2859 5409 |
Environmental Team Leader
(ETL) (Aurecon Hong Kong
Limited) |
Mr. Fredrick Leong |
3664 6888 |
2.3. Status of Submission required under the FEP & EP during reporting period
2.3.1. The status of statutory environmental compliance with the EP conditions under the EIAO, submission status under the FEP & EP during reporting period are presented in Table 2-3. The detail status of statutory environmental compliance with the EP conditions under the EIAO, submission status under the FEP & EP for NENTX project are shown in Appendix D.
Table 2-3 Status of Submissions required under the FEP
& EP during reporting period
EP Condition |
Submission / Measures |
Status |
|
2.1 |
2.3 |
Management
Organization of Main Construction Companies |
Submitted |
2.2 |
2.4 |
Setting
up of Community Liaison Group |
Community Liaison Group
was set up. |
2.3 |
2.5 |
Submission
of EM&A Manual |
Submitted |
2.5 |
2.7 |
Submission
of Vegetation Survey (Transplantation Proposal) |
Submitted |
2.6 |
2.8 |
Submission
of translocation proposal |
Submitted |
2.7 |
2.9 |
Submission
of Transplantation Report and Post-Transplantation Monitoring |
Submitted |
2.8 |
2.10 |
Submission
of Translocation Report and Post-Translocation Monitoring |
Translocation was carried out and the report submitted. |
2.9 |
2.11 |
Submission of Detailed Landfill Gas
Hazard Assessment Report |
Submitted |
2.10 |
2.12 |
Submission
of Waste Management Plan |
Submitted |
3.2 |
3.2 |
Submission
of Baseline Monitoring Report |
Submitted |
3.3 |
3.3 |
Submission
of Monthly EM&A Report |
Submitted |
2.4. Status of Environmental Approval Document
2.4.1. A summary of the relevant valid permits, licences, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project since the granting of the EP is presented in Table 2-4.
Reference |
Expiry Date |
Remark |
|
Environmental Permit (EP) |
EP-292/2007 |
Throughout the Contract |
Permit granted on 26 November 2007 |
Further Environmental Permit (FEP) |
FEP-01/292/2007 |
Throughout the Contract |
Permit granted on 28 April 2022 |
FEP-02/292/2007 |
Throughout the Contract |
Permit granted on23 August 2023 |
|
Notification of Construction Works as required
under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
479809 |
Throughout the Construction Phase |
Notified on 13 May 2022 |
Registration of Waste Producer under Waste
Disposal Ordinance |
7043692 |
Throughout the Contract |
Registered on 13 April 2022 |
Registration as Chemical Waste Producer |
5213-642-P1034-18 |
Throughout the Contract |
Registered on 11 July 2022 |
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RN1151-22 |
28
February 2023 |
Approved on 29 November 2022 (cancelled with
effect from 14 February 2023) |
GW-RN0131-23 |
13
May 2023 |
Approved on 9 February 2023 (Cancelled with effect from 23 March 2023) |
|
GW-RN0299-23 |
22
June 2023 |
Approved on 21 March 2023 |
|
GW-RN0619-23 |
22 September 2023 |
Permit
granted on 16 June 2023 |
|
GW-RN1012-23 |
22 December 2023 |
Permit
granted on 22 September 2023 (Replaced CNP No. GW-RN0619-23) |
|
Effluent Discharge License under Water Pollution
Control Ordinance |
WT00042301-2022 |
31
October 2027 |
Permit
granted on 18 October 2022 Variation of Licence
(Permit granted on 7 February 2023) |
3.1.1.1
In accordance with the EM&A Manual, 1-hr & 24-hr Total Suspended
Particulates (TSP) levels should be measured at the designated air quality
monitoring stations in every 6 days to ensure that any deteriorating air
quality could be readily detected, and timely action shall be undertaken to
rectify such situation. For 1-hr TSP monitoring, the sampling frequency of at
least three times in every six-days should be undertaken when the highest dust
impact occurs. The specific time to start and stop the 24- hr TSP monitoring
shall be clearly defined for each location.
3.1.2 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Location
3.1.2.1
According to the EM&A
Manual, three monitoring stations namely AM(D)1, AM(D)2 and AM(D)3 are selected
for the impact monitoring.
3.1.2.2 A baseline monitoring plan has been submitted to IEC and EPD on 31 May 2022 including the proposal with justification of change of monitoring locations. Due to limited access to the original monitoring locations at AM(D)1, AM(D)2 and AM(D)3, the adjusted stations at AM1, AM2 and AM3 were agreed with IEC prior to the baseline and impact monitoring. The locations of adjusted dust monitoring locations are shown in Figure 2.
3.1.2.3 The locations of dust monitoring stations are shown in Table 3-1. The monitoring parameters, frequency and duration are shown in Table 3-2.
Table 3-1 Locations of Dust Monitoring Stations
Monitoring Station |
Representative for |
Monitoring Parameters |
|
AM1 |
Tung Lo Hang |
1-hr and 24-hr
TSP |
|
AM2 |
Heung Yuen Wai |
1-hr and 24-hr TSP |
|
AM3 |
Wo Keng Shan Tsuen |
1-hr and
24-hr TSP |
Remarks:
The contractor passed correspondence including
original monitoring locations specified on the Approved EM&A Manual to the
village representatives on 26 April 2022. After a meeting with Ta Kwu Ling
District Rural Committee (RC) Chairman, representative from the RC and a few
villagers on 1 May 2022, all the Village Heads of Wo Keng Shan Tsuen, Heung
Yuen Wai and Lin Ma Hang verbally refused to accept our proposal for
installation of dust and / or noise monitoring equipment within or next to
their villages, for the baseline & impact monitoring.
AM(D)1 Tung Lo Hang, AM(D)2 Heung
Yuen Wai, AM(D)3 Wo Keng Shan Tsuen are the air monitoring stations for the construction
phase EM&A programme as identified in the approved EM&A Manual for the
Project. The access to Tung Lo Hang, Heung Yuen Wai and Wo Keng Shan Tsuen were
denied. A search for alternative air
monitoring locations (AM1, AM2 & AM3) was carried out during the site
visit.
The Baseline Monitoring Plan has
been submitted to IEC and EPD including the proposal of change of monitoring
locations on 31 May 2022. This arrangement was conducted between baseline and impact monitoring and
has been agreed by the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) and no comment
received from EPD.
Due to the adjustment of the
location of AM(D)1, AM(D)2 & AM(D)3to AM1, AM2 & AM3, the measured air
quality levels at AM1, AM2 & AM3 would represent the air quality levels at
AM(D)1, AM(D)2 & AM(D)3.
Table 3-2 Dust
Impact Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Monitoring
Station |
Parameter |
Frequency and Duration |
AM1, AM2, AM3 |
1-hr TSP |
At least 3 times per 6 days |
24-hr TSP |
1 time per 6 days |
3.1.3.1 The impact dust monitoring results are summarized in Table 3-3 and Table 3-4. The graphical presentations of monitoring data are presented in Appendix E.
Month |
Average
1-hr TSP Concentration, µg/m³ (Range) |
||
Dust Monitoring Station |
|||
AM1 |
AM2 |
AM3 |
|
Dec 2022 |
54 (44 – 65) |
54 (45 – 61) |
63 (57 – 68) |
Jan 2023 |
49
(34 – 60) |
42
(32 – 53) |
52
(39 – 67) |
Feb 2023 |
27 (18 – 41) |
28 (20 – 43) |
33 (21 – 51) |
Mar 2023 |
45
(22 – 67) |
49
(31 – 65) |
47
(15 – 68) |
Apr 2023 |
35 (19 – 55) |
42 (31 – 76) |
40 (23 – 54) |
May 2023 |
23
(15 – 40) |
30
(15 – 43) |
35
(26 – 49) |
Jun 2023 |
28 (15 – 38) |
31 (21 – 45) |
33 (21 – 45) |
Jul 2023 |
35 (21 – 46) |
34 (21 – 48) |
32 (21 – 44) |
Aug 2023 |
33 (20 – 40) |
35 (29 – 40) |
39 (29 – 50) |
Sep 2023 |
44 (36 – 54) |
39 (36 – 42) |
45 (36 – 53) |
Oct 2023 |
31 (21 – 40) |
42 (34 – 52) |
46 (32 – 60) |
Nov 2023 |
28 (22 – 36) |
34 (30 – 39) |
37 (30 – 43) |
Dec 2023 |
29 (26 – 34) |
37 (23 – 59) |
51 (40 – 67) |
Action Level |
>285 |
>279 |
>285 |
Limit Level |
>500 |
Month |
Average
24-hr TSP Concentration, µg/m³ (Range) |
||
Dust Monitoring Station |
|||
AM1 |
AM2 |
AM3 |
|
Dec 2022 |
114 (88 – 147) |
65 (43 – 92) |
140 (126 – 157) |
Jan 2023 |
98 (60 – 133) |
53 (21 – 79) |
85 (56 – 134) |
Feb 2023 |
145 (62 – 286) |
89 (61 – 126) |
181 (93 – 284) |
Mar 2023 |
184 (30 – 490) |
78 (29 – 152) |
162 (35 – 337) |
Apr 2023 |
60 (34 – 112) |
63 (37 – 111) |
70 (40 – 151) |
May 2023 |
62 (28 – 106) |
73 (53 – 87) |
93 (29 – 121) |
Jun 2023 |
47 (28 – 95) |
41 (32 – 54) |
82 (43 – 130) |
Jul 2023 |
36 (17 – 60) |
34 (25 – 48) |
30 (22 – 40) |
Aug 2023 |
29 (19 – 37) |
33 (27 – 43) |
40 (27 – 63) |
Sep 2023 |
40 (32 – 48) |
41 (30 – 53) |
51 (36 – 67) |
Oct 2023 |
70 (62 – 77) |
55 (43 – 77) |
70 (61 – 78) |
Nov 2023 |
112 (101 – 128) |
89 (70 – 110) |
101 (88 – 117) |
Dec 2023 |
97 (71 – 108) |
81 (65 – 119) |
91 (70 – 122) |
Action Level |
>164 |
>152 |
>163 |
Limit Level |
>260 |
3.1.3.2 The Summary of Impact 1-hr & 24-hr TSP Exceedance are shown in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5 Summary of Impact 1-hr & 24-hr TSP Exceedance
Dust
Monitoring Station |
AM1 |
AM2 |
AM3 |
||||
Level
Exceedance Parameters |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
|
1-hr TSP |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
24-hr TSP |
Exceedance Date |
1 Mar 23* 3 Mar 23* |
24 Feb 23* 2 Mar 23* 4 Mar 23* |
- |
- |
18 Feb 23* 3 Mar 23* 4 Mar 23* 8 Mar 23* |
24 Feb 23* 1 Mar 23* 2 Mar 23* |
Exceedance Count |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
Remarks: * equal
to non-project related
3.1.3.3 No Action / Limit Level exceedance for 1-hr TSP impact monitoring at AM1, AM2 & AM3 was recorded during the reporting period.
3.1.3.4 2 Action Level Exceedance and 3 Limit Level Exceedance for 24-hr TSP monitoring at AM1 was recorded during the reporting period. The exceedance was considered likely caused by external sources such as the high level of background air quality in Hong Kong during the monitoring period etc and not project related. The Notification of Environmental Quality Limits Exceedances are presented in Appendix F.
3.1.3.5 No Action / Limit Level exceedance for 24-hr TSP monitoring at AM2 was recorded during the period.
3.1.3.6 4 Action Level Exceedance and 3 Limit Level Exceedance for 24-hr TSP monitoring at AM3 was recorded during the reporting period. The exceedance was considered likely caused by external sources such as the high level of background air quality in Hong Kong during the monitoring period etc and not project related. The Notification of Environmental Quality Limits Exceedances are presented in Appendix F.
3.1.4 Recommended Mitigation Measures
3.1.4.1 The recommended dust mitigation measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
• The contractor shall follow the procedures and requirements given in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation.
• Dust emission from construction vehicle movement is confined within the worksites area.
• Watering facilities will be provided at every designated vehicular exit point.
• Good site practice is recommended during construction phase.
3.1.5.1 Should non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the action plan in Table 3-6 shall be carried out.
Table 3-6 Event
and Action Plan for dust impact
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Action Level |
|||
Exceedance for one sample |
•
Identify
source •
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance •
Inform
IEC and Contractor •
Repeat
measurement to confirm findings • Increase monitoring frequency to daily
if exceedance is due to the Project and continue until the monitoring results
reduce to below action level |
•
Verify
the Notification of Exceedance •
Check
monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor's working methods •
Discuss
with ET and Contractor on proposed remedial measures |
•
Rectify
any unacceptable practice •
Amend
working methods if appropriate |
Exceedance for two or more consecutive
samples |
•
Identify source •
Prepare Notification of Exceedance •
Inform Contractor and IEC •
Repeat measurements to confirm findings •
Increase
monitoring frequency to daily if exceedance is due to the Project and
continue until the monitoring results reduce to below action level •
Discuss with IEC for remedial action required •
Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented •
Continue monitoring at daily intervals if exceedance is due to
the Project •
If no exceedance for 3
consecutive days, cease additional monitoring |
•
Verify the Notification of Exceedance •
Check monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor's working
methods •
Discuss with ET and Contractor on proposed remedial measures •
Review with analysed results submitted by ET •
Review the proposed remedial measures by Contractor •
Supervise the implementation of remedial measures |
•
Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working
days of notification •
Implement the agreed proposals •
Amend proposal if appropriate |
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Limit Level |
|||
Exceedance
for one sample |
•
Identify
source •
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance •
Inform
IEC and Contractor •
Repeat
measurement to confirm findings •
Increase
monitoring frequency to daily if exceedance is due to the Project and
continue until the monitoring results reduce to below limit level •
Assess
effectiveness of Contractor's remedial actions and keep EPD and IEC informed
of the results |
•
Verify
the Notification of Exceedance •
Check
monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor's working methods •
Discuss
with ET and Contractor potential remedial actions •
Supervise
the implementation of remedial measures |
•
Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance •
Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification •
Implement
the agreed proposals •
Amend
proposal if appropriate |
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
• Identify source • Prepare Notification of Exceedance • Inform IEC and EPD the causes and
actions taken for the exceedances • Discuss with IEC for remedial action
required • Ensure remedial measures are properly
implemented • Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s
remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD and informed of the results • Increase monitoring frequency to
confirm findings • If exceedance stops, cease additional
monitoring |
• Verify the Notification of Exceedance • Check monitoring data submitted by ET
and Contractor's working methods • Discuss amongst ET and Contractor on
the potential remedial actions. • Review Contractor's remedial actions
whenever necessary to assure their effectiveness • Supervise the implementation of
remedial measures |
• Take immediate action to avoid further
exceedance • Submit proposals for remedial actions
to IEC of notification • Implement the agreed proposals • Resubmit proposals if problem still
not under control • Stop the relevant activity of works
until the exceedance is abated |
4.1.1
In
accordance with the EM&A manual, noise impact monitoring shall be carried
out at 2 monitoring stations NM1 and NM2 once a week during normal construction
working hour (0700-1900 Monday to Saturday). The minimum logging interval shall
be 30 minutes with average of 6 consecutive Leq 5 mins. L10 and L90 shall also
be measured at 5 mins intervals.
4.2 Monitoring Locations, Parameters and Frequency
4.2.1
According
to the EM&A Manual, two monitoring stations namely NM1 and NM2 are selected
for the impact monitoring.
4.2.2
A baseline
monitoring plan has been submitted to IEC and EPD on 31 May 2022 including the
proposal with justification of change of monitoring locations. Due to limited
access to the original monitoring locations at NM1 and NM2, the adjusted
stations at NM1a and NM2a were agreed with IEC prior to the baseline and impact
monitoring. The noise monitoring locations are summarized in Table 4-1
and shown in Figure 2. The
frequency and duration are shown in Table 4-2.
Monitoring
Station |
Representative
for |
Type of
Measurement |
|
NM1a |
Wo Keng Shan Tsuen |
Free field |
|
NM2a |
Lin Ma Hang |
Free field |
The contractor passed correspondence including original
monitoring locations specified on the Approved EM&A Manual to the village
representatives on 26 April 2022. After a meeting with Ta Kwu Ling District
Rural Committee (RC) Chairman, representative from the RC and a few villagers
on 1 May 2022, all the Village Heads of Wo Keng Shan Tsuen, Heung Yuen Wai and
Lin Ma Hang verbally refused to accept our proposal for installation of dust
and / or noise monitoring equipment within or next to their villages, for the
baseline & impact monitoring.
NM1 Wo Keng Shan Tsuen & NM2 Lin Ma Hang are the noise
monitoring stations for the construction phase EM&A programme as identified
in the approved EM&A Manual for the Project. The access to Tung Lo Hang,
Heung Yuen Wai and Wo Keng Shan Tsuen were denied. A search for alternative noise monitoring
locations (NM1a & NM2a) was carried out during the site visit.
The Baseline Monitoring Plan has been submitted to IEC and
EPD including the proposal of change of monitoring locations on 31 May 2022. This
arrangement was conducted between baseline and impact monitoring and has been
agreed by the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) and no comments received
from EPD. Noise measurement at NM1a & NM2a will be considered as free-field
and a correction of +3dB(A) would be made to the noise monitoring results.
Due to the adjustment of the location of NM1 & NM2 to
NM1a & NM2a, the measured noise levels at NM1 & NM2 would represent the
noise levels at NM1 & NM2.
Frequency and Duration |
||
NM1a and NM2a |
LAeq
(30mins) average of
6 consecutive Leq (5min); L10 (5min) & L90 (5min) |
Once a week during normal construction working hour (0700-1900
Monday to Saturday) |
4.3.1
The impact
noise monitoring results are summarized in Table 4-3. The graphical
presentations of monitoring data are presented in Appendix E.
Month |
Average
Leq, 30min, dB(A) (Range) |
|
Noise Monitoring Station |
||
NM1a |
NM2a |
|
Dec 2022 |
51.1 (48.2 – 54.0) |
48.1 (47.6 – 50.0) |
Jan 2023 |
53.6 (51.1 – 56.1) |
49.8 (48.9 – 51.2) |
Feb 2023 |
52.8 (47.0 – 54.9) |
50.2 (46.2 – 54.5) |
Mar 2023 |
58.0 (53.1 – 62.3) |
57.1 (42.3 – 62.1) |
Apr 2023 |
56.8 (53.7 –
58.4) |
60.1 (52.8 –
65.4) |
May 2023 |
57.4 (47.6 – 61.0) |
55.8 (48.4 – 58.0) |
Jun 2023 |
58.6 (53.5 – 61.5) |
53.9 (48.5 – 57.7) |
Jul 2023 |
62.1 (61.0 – 63.7) |
56.3 (54.2 – 58.2) |
Aug 2023 |
52.5 (51.3 – 53.1) |
51.1 (47.3 – 54.5) |
Sep 2023 |
58.3 (56.6 – 59.3) |
53.6 (49.8 – 54.7) |
Oct 2023 |
63.1 (59.6 – 64.8) |
55.2 (53.8 – 56.3) |
Nov 2023 |
60.0 (52.2 – 63.3) |
49.1 (47.7 – 49.8) |
Dec 2023 |
61.9 (57.7 – 64.1) |
53.5 (49.6 – 54.9) |
Action Level |
When one documented
complaint is received |
|
Limit Level |
>75dB(A) |
(1)
* A correction of +3 dB(A) was made to the free field
measurements
(2)
If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the
conditions stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the Noise
Control Authority have to be followed.
4.3.2
No
particular observations are identified near the monitoring stations during the monitoring
period.
4.3.3
The
Summary of Impact Noise Exceedance are shown in Table 4-4.
Noise
Monitoring Station |
NM1(a) |
NM2(a) |
|||
Level
Exceedance Parameters |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
|
LAeq(30mins) |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal to non-project related
4.3.4
No
exceedance of Action and Limit Levels of construction noise was recorded during
the reporting period. Therefore, there was no record of Notification of
Environmental Quality Limits Exceedance in the Appendix F.
4.4 Recommended Mitigation Measures
4.4.1 The recommended noise mitigation measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
1. Use of good site practices to limit noise emissions by considering the following:
• Only well-maintained plant should be operated on-site and plant should be serviced regularly during the construction programme;
• Machines and plant (such as trucks, cranes) that may be in intermittent use should be shut down between work periods or should be throttled down to a minimum;
• Plant known to emit noise strongly in one direction, where possible, be orientated so that the noise is directed away from nearby NSRs;
• Silencers or mufflers on construction equipment should be properly fitted and maintained during the construction works;
• Mobile plant should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible and practicable;
• Material stockpiles, mobile container site officer and other structures should be effectively utilised, where practicable, to screen noise from on-site construction activities.
2. Select “Quiet plants” which comply with the BS 5228 Part 1 or TM standards.
4.5.1
Should
non-compliance of the criteria occurs, action in accordance with the action
plan in Table 4-5 shall be carried out.
Table 4-5 Event and action plan for
construction noise monitoring
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Action Level |
•
Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance •
Prepare Notification of Exceedance •
Inform IEC and Contractor •
Report the results of investigation to IEC, and Contractor •
Discuss with Contractor and IEC for formulate remedial measures •
Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented • Have additional monitoring if exceedance
is due to the Project. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
•
Verify the Notification of Exceedance •
Review the analysed results submitted by ET • Discuss with ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial
actions •
Review the proposed remedial measures • Supervise the implementation of remedial
measures |
•
Submit noise mitigation proposals to IEC •
Implement the agreed noise mitigation proposals |
Exceedance of Limit Level |
• Identify source, investigate the causes of
exceedance • Prepare Notification of Exceedance • Inform IEC and Contractor • Repeat measurements to confirm findings • Discuss with Contractor and IEC for remedial
measures • Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented • Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial
actions and keep IEC and EPD informed of the results • Have additional monitoring if exceedance is due to
the Project. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
• Verify the Notification of Exceedance • Review the analysed results submitted by ET •
Discuss with ET, and Contractor on the
potential remedial actions •
Review the
proposed remedial measures •
Supervise the implementation of
remedial measures |
•
Take immediate action to avoid further
exceedance •
Submit proposals for remedial actions
to IEC of notification •
Implement the agreed proposals •
Resubmit proposals if problem still not
under control •
Stop the relevant portion of works as
determined by project proponent until the exceedance is abated. |
5.1.1.1
In
accordance with the EM&A manual, groundwater quality monitoring shall be
carried out at least once per month at the 35 designated groundwater monitoring
locations (i.e ED1 to ED35). Based on the existing construction programme, site
clearance and site formation works for future landfilling area are in progress.
The groundwater monitoring locations ED1 to ED35 will be installed after the
site formation work of the landfilling area. No
groundwater monitoring is required before the completion of site formation work
of the landfilling area.
5.2.1.1
In
accordance with the EM&A manual, impact surface water quality monitoring
was carried out at the two designated surface water discharge points (i.e WM1
and WM2) for once per month from commencement of construction works of the
Project.
5.2.2 Monitoring Locations, Parameters and Frequency
5.2.2.1
Impact
surface water monitoring was carried out at WM1 and WM2. Additional surface water monitoring was carried out at
WM2 and GR3 (EPD Monitoring Location) on 28 September 2023. The monitoring
locations are indicated in Table 5-1 and Figure 2.
5.2.2.2
The
monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of surface water quality
monitoring are summarized in Table 5-2.
The additional parameters, frequency and duration of surface water quality
monitoring are summarized in Table 5-3.
Table 5-1 Surface water quality monitoring locations
WM1 |
Upstream of Lin Ma Hang
River |
836665 |
845020 |
WM2 |
Ping Yuen River |
835592 |
844186 |
GR3* |
Ping Yuen River |
835361 |
844134 |
“*” The monitoring location only conducted based on the environmental
complaint.
Table 5-2 Surface water quality monitoring Parameters, Frequency and
Duration
pH, Electrical conductivity, DO,
Turbidity, SS, Alkalinity, COD, BOD5, TOC, Ammonia-nitrogen, TKN,
Nitrate, Sulphate, Sulphite, Phosphate, Chloride, Sodium, Mg, Ca, K, Fe, Ni,
Zn, Mn, Cu, Pb, Cd, Coliform Count, Oil and Grease |
Once per month |
Table 5-3 Additional
surface water quality monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Parameter |
Frequency |
pH, Electrical conductivity, DO, Turbidity, SS, COD, BOD5,
Ammonia-nitrogen, Chloride, Fe, Zn, and Coliform Count |
Based on the case of Environmental Complaint |
5.2.3 Monitoring Results
5.2.3.1
The summary of monitoring results is presented
in Table 5-4, Table 5-5 & Table 5-6. Detailed
graphical presentations at each monitoring station of surface water quality
(DO, SS and Turbidity) at the monitoring stations are given in Appendix E.
Table 5-4 Summary of Impact Surface Water Monitoring Results at WM1
Monitoring Parameter(s) |
Monitoring Station WM1 |
|||||
Monitoring Results
|
Action Level |
Limit Level |
||||
Dec 2022 |
Jan 2023 |
Feb 2023 |
Mar 2023 |
|||
pH |
7.4 |
7.1 |
7.4 |
7.1 |
>7.7 |
>7.8 |
DO in mg/L |
10.8 |
10.5 |
7.7 |
7.6 |
<7.4 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
8.6 |
6.6 |
5.0 |
6.3 |
>9.2 |
>9.5 |
Electrical
Conductivity in μS/cm |
58 |
51 |
83 |
63 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
3.4 |
7.1 |
3.4 |
2.1 |
>9.7 |
>11.4 |
Alkalinity
in mg/L |
16 |
16 |
16 |
14 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
<5 |
5.0 |
<5 |
6 |
||
BOD5
in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen
in mg/L |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.11 |
0.06 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
||
Nitrate
in mg/L |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
3 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
||
Sulphite
in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus as P in
mg/L |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.02 |
||
Chloride
in mg/L |
6 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
8540 |
7830 |
8390 |
7960 |
||
Mg
in µg/L |
410 |
440 |
420 |
440 |
||
Ca in µg/L |
3180 |
3030 |
3100 |
3280 |
||
K in
µg/L |
290 |
290 |
550 |
400 |
||
Fe in µg/L |
660 |
660 |
490 |
1310 |
||
Ni in
µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
3.0 |
<1 |
||
Zn in µg/L |
<10 |
<10 |
11.0 |
<10 |
||
Mn in
µg/L |
42 |
55 |
57 |
106 |
||
Cu in µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
1.0 |
<1 |
||
Pb in
µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
||
Cd in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform
Count in CFU/100mL |
Not detected |
26 |
24 |
Not Detected |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Monitoring
Parameter(s) |
Monitoring Station WM1 |
||||
Monitoring Results |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|||
Apr 2023 |
May 2023 |
Jun 2023 |
|||
pH |
7.1 |
6.9 |
7.1 |
>7.7 |
>7.8 |
DO in mg/L |
7.8 |
7.9 |
7.6 |
<7.4 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
0.4 |
3.1 |
5.7 |
>9.2 |
>9.5 |
Electrical Conductivity in μS/cm |
64 |
69 |
73 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
3.2 |
3.3 |
6.6 |
>9.7 |
>11.4 |
Alkalinity in mg/L |
13 |
18 |
15 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
17 |
10 |
9 |
||
BOD5 in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
2 |
3 |
2 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen in mg/L |
0.22 |
0.06 |
<0.01 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
||
Nitrate in mg/L |
0.03 |
<0.01 |
0.06 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
7 |
4 |
2 |
||
Sulphite in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus as P in mg/L |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.01 |
||
Chloride in mg/L |
8 |
7 |
6 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
9170 |
8590 |
6750 |
||
Mg in µg/L |
500 |
470 |
540 |
||
Ca in µg/L |
3720 |
3460 |
3340 |
||
K in
µg/L |
720 |
570 |
830 |
||
Fe in µg/L |
480 |
660 |
570 |
||
Ni in
µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
||
Zn in µg/L |
19 |
<10 |
13 |
||
Mn in
µg/L |
70 |
84 |
34 |
||
Cu in µg/L |
2.0 |
2.0 |
1 |
||
Pb in
µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
||
Cd in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform Count in CFU/100mL |
420 |
40000 |
220 |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Monitoring
Parameter(s) |
Monitoring Station WM1 |
||||
Monitoring Results |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|||
Jul 2023 |
Aug 2023 |
Sep 2023 |
|||
pH |
7.2 |
6.7 |
7.2 |
>7.7 |
>7.8 |
DO in mg/L |
7.5 |
6.5 |
7.8 |
<7.4 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
6.1 |
7.4 |
4.3 |
>9.2 |
>9.5 |
Electrical Conductivity in μS/cm |
99 |
68 |
47 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
2.0 |
7.2 |
3.0 |
>9.7 |
>11.4 |
Alkalinity in mg/L |
18 |
19 |
11 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
12 |
6 |
9 |
||
BOD5 in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
3 |
<1 |
2 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen in mg/L |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
||
Nitrate in mg/L |
0.53 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
7 |
2 |
4 |
||
Sulphite in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus as P in mg/L |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.02 |
||
Chloride in mg/L |
7 |
5 |
6 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
8350 |
7740 |
6340 |
||
Mg in µg/L |
660 |
560 |
430 |
||
Ca in µg/L |
19400 |
3740 |
<0.2 |
||
K in
µg/L |
690 |
460 |
680 |
||
Fe in µg/L |
780 |
780 |
270 |
||
Ni in
µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
||
Zn in µg/L |
72 |
15 |
14 |
||
Mn in
µg/L |
72 |
46 |
32 |
||
Cu in µg/L |
2.0 |
<1 |
1 |
||
Pb in
µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
||
Cd in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform Count in CFU/100mL |
56 |
68 |
240 |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Monitoring
Parameter(s) |
Monitoring Station WM1 |
||||
Monitoring Results |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|||
Oct 2023 |
Nov 2023 |
Dec 2023 |
|||
pH |
7.4 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
>7.7 |
>7.8 |
DO in mg/L |
7.9 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
<7.4 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
6.6 |
5.1 |
5.8 |
>9.2 |
>9.5 |
Electrical Conductivity in μS/cm |
51 |
59 |
95 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
4.0 |
2.5 |
9.5 |
>9.7 |
>11.4 |
Alkalinity in mg/L |
14 |
17 |
16 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
21 |
7 |
7 |
||
BOD5 in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen in mg/L |
0.08 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
||
Nitrate in mg/L |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
3 |
||
Sulphite in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus as P in
mg/L |
0.01 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
||
Chloride in mg/L |
6 |
6 |
6 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
6790 |
8120 |
8380 |
||
Mg in µg/L |
450 |
480 |
500 |
||
Ca in µg/L |
2850 |
3330 |
3290 |
||
K in
µg/L |
530 |
600 |
400 |
||
Fe in µg/L |
330 |
420 |
930 |
||
Ni in
µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
1.0 |
||
Zn in µg/L |
10 |
13 |
<10 |
||
Mn in
µg/L |
28 |
41 |
57 |
||
Cu in µg/L |
<1 |
2.0 |
<1 |
||
Pb in
µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
||
Cd in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform Count in CFU/100mL |
1600 |
25 |
No
detected |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Monitoring Parameter(s) |
Monitoring Station WM2 |
|||||
Monitoring Results
|
Action Level |
Limit Level |
||||
Dec 2022 |
Jan 2023 |
Feb 2023 |
Mar 2023 |
|||
pH |
7.5 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
7.0 |
>7.6 |
>7.7 |
DO in mg/L |
6.5 |
6.9 |
7.5 |
7.9 |
<5 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
23.3 |
4.1 |
8.6 |
13.7 |
>108.3 |
>108.9 |
Electrical
Conductivity in μS/cm |
114 |
120 |
124 |
124 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
25.6 |
20.4 |
9.1 |
12.0 |
>94.5 |
>94.7 |
Alkalinity
in mg/L |
35 |
38 |
42 |
36 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
<5 |
6 |
7 |
<5 |
||
BOD5
in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
3 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen
in mg/L |
0.18 |
0.16 |
0.29 |
0.33 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
||
Nitrate
in mg/L |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.01 |
0.05 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
8 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
||
Sulphite
in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus as P in mg/L |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
||
Chloride
in mg/L |
6 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
6710 |
6400 |
5710 |
5810 |
||
Mg
in µg/L |
1140 |
1020 |
720 |
690 |
||
Ca in µg/L |
12100 |
11200 |
7390 |
7020 |
||
K in
µg/L |
2310 |
1680 |
1130 |
1050 |
||
Fe in µg/L |
6040 |
6040 |
10700 |
10600 |
||
Ni in
µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
||
Zn in µg/L |
21 |
31 |
34 |
20 |
||
Mn in
µg/L |
2150 |
2100 |
2910 |
3070 |
||
Cu in µg/L |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
||
Pb in
µg/L |
2 |
1 |
<1 |
<1 |
||
Cd in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform
Count in CFU/100mL |
320 |
21 |
4200 |
14 |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Monitoring
Parameter(s) |
Monitoring Station WM2 |
||||
Monitoring Results |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|||
Apr 2023 |
May 2023 |
Jun 2023 |
|||
pH |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
>7.6 |
>7.7 |
DO in mg/L |
6.7 |
8.1 |
6.8 |
<5 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
64.3 |
30.6 |
142.5 |
>108.3 |
>108.9 |
Electrical Conductivity in μS/cm |
147 |
212 |
142 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
48.1 |
34.2 |
83.2 |
>94.5 |
>94.7 |
Alkalinity in mg/L |
48 |
58 |
35 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
15 |
13 |
14 |
||
BOD5 in mg/L |
2.0 |
3.0 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
2 |
5 |
2 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen in mg/L |
<0.01 |
0.39 |
0.14 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
||
Nitrate in mg/L |
0.14 |
0.03 |
0.32 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
9 |
8 |
17 |
||
Sulphite in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus as P in mg/L |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
||
Chloride in mg/L |
7 |
15 |
11 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
7890 |
11800 |
6830 |
||
Mg in µg/L |
1370 |
1420 |
1560 |
||
Ca in µg/L |
15400 |
18600 |
18600 |
||
K in
µg/L |
3410 |
3900 |
3050 |
||
Fe in µg/L |
9240 |
8990 |
3850 |
||
Ni in
µg/L |
2 |
1 |
12.0 |
||
Zn in µg/L |
35 |
26 |
51 |
||
Mn in
µg/L |
2220 |
2370 |
509 |
||
Cu in µg/L |
4 |
3 |
6 |
||
Pb in
µg/L |
4 |
3 |
11 |
||
Cd in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform Count in CFU/100mL |
330 |
1500 |
4200 |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Monitoring
Parameter(s) |
Monitoring Station WM2 |
||||
Monitoring Results |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|||
Jul 2023 |
Aug 2023 |
Sep 2023 |
|||
pH |
7.1 |
6.8 |
7.2 |
>7.6 |
>7.7 |
DO in mg/L |
7.3 |
7.0 |
7.6 |
<5 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
50.2 |
32.2 |
12 |
>108.3 |
>108.9 |
Electrical Conductivity in μS/cm |
137 |
133 |
125 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
16.8 |
30.8 |
7.6 |
>94.5 |
>94.7 |
Alkalinity in mg/L |
38 |
35 |
31 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
9 |
7 |
6 |
||
BOD5 in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
2 |
<1 |
2 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen in mg/L |
0.07 |
0.08 |
0.13 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
||
Nitrate in mg/L |
0.26 |
0.24 |
0.24 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
13 |
17 |
20 |
||
Sulphite in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus as P in
mg/L |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
||
Chloride in mg/L |
7 |
6 |
4 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
6120 |
5840 |
4680 |
||
Mg in µg/L |
1330 |
1480 |
1290 |
||
Ca in µg/L |
15600 |
16100 |
<0.2 |
||
K in
µg/L |
2130 |
2140 |
1450 |
||
Fe in µg/L |
2370 |
2710 |
670 |
||
Ni in
µg/L |
2.0 |
4 |
<1 |
||
Zn in µg/L |
26 |
68 |
10 |
||
Mn in
µg/L |
757 |
1160 |
563 |
||
Cu in µg/L |
2 |
2 |
<1 |
||
Pb in
µg/L |
3 |
4 |
1 |
||
Cd in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform Count in CFU/100mL |
850 |
290 |
290 |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Monitoring Parameter(s) |
Monitoring
Station WM2 |
||||
Monitoring
Results |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
|||
Oct
2023 |
Nov
2023 |
Dec
2023 |
|||
pH |
7.6 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
>7.6 |
>7.7 |
DO in mg/L |
7.5 |
6.5 |
5.6 |
<5 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
43.2 |
20.8 |
60.2 |
>108.3 |
>108.9 |
Electrical
Conductivity in μS/cm |
148 |
159 |
191 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
19.4 |
10.0 |
44.6 |
>94.5 |
>94.7 |
Alkalinity
in mg/L |
36 |
44 |
54 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
7 |
||
BOD5
in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
2 |
2 |
2 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen
in mg/L |
0.11 |
0.06 |
0.26 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
||
Nitrate
in mg/L |
0.25 |
0.19 |
0.15 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
18 |
24 |
22 |
||
Sulphite
in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus as P in mg/L |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
||
Chloride
in mg/L |
5 |
6 |
8 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
5190 |
6010 |
7770 |
||
Mg
in µg/L |
1320 |
1470 |
1970 |
||
Ca in µg/L |
16500 |
19400 |
23800 |
||
K in µg/L |
2470 |
2010 |
2480 |
||
Fe in µg/L |
1780 |
1340 |
3080 |
||
Ni in µg/L |
1.0 |
2 |
2 |
||
Zn in µg/L |
13 |
20 |
26 |
||
Mn in µg/L |
703 |
1350 |
2540 |
||
Cu in µg/L |
1 |
1 |
3 |
||
Pb in µg/L |
5 |
1 |
4 |
||
Cd in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform
Count in CFU/100mL |
1000 |
56 |
10 |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Monitoring Parameter(s) |
Monitoring
Station |
|||
WM2 |
GR3 (EPD Monitoring Location) |
|||
Monitoring Results |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Monitoring Results |
|
pH |
7.5 |
>7.6 |
>7.7 |
7.4 |
DO in mg/L |
7.8 |
<5 |
<4 |
7.6 |
Turbidity in NTU |
8.8 |
>108.3 |
>108.9 |
13.1 |
Electrical
Conductivity in μS/cm |
71 |
--- |
--- |
108 |
SS in mg/L |
5.5 |
>94.5 |
>94.7 |
4.9 |
COD
in mg/L |
<5 |
|
6 |
|
BOD5 in
mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen
in mg/L |
2 |
2 |
||
Chloride in mg/L |
0.12 |
0.10 |
||
Iron
in µg/L |
910 |
670 |
||
Zinc in µg/L |
13 |
20 |
||
Coliform
Count
in CFU/100mL |
3400 |
380 |
5.2.3.2
The Summary of Impact Surface Water Quality
Exceedance are shown in Table 5-7.
Table 5-7 Summary of Impact Surface Water Quality Exceedance during the reporting period
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Station |
WM1 |
WM2 |
|||
Level Exceedance Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
pH |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
DO |
Exceedance Date |
4
Aug 23* |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Turbidity |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
21 Jun 23 |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
SS |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal to non-project related
5.2.3.3
No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels of
surface water monitoring was recorded from December 2022 to March 2023
5.2.3.4
No exceedance of Action Levels of surface water
monitoring was recorded from April to June 2023. 1 turbidity exceedance of
Limit Levels of surface water quality at WM2 was recorded from April to June
2023. After the investigation, the exceedance may involve the construction
runoff of the project. The rectification actions are conducted by the
contractor in progress. The rectification works should be achieved minimization
the potential risk of causing high concentration of construction runoff,
enhancement of maintenance
of Temporary Surface Water Drainage System (TSWDS), enhancement of the
effectiveness and treatment capacity of the TSWDS & Enhancement of
temporary landscape treatment as green cover and Minimization the potential
risk of causing high concentration of construction runoff.
5.2.3.5
No exceedance of Action Levels of surface water
monitoring was recorded in July 2023.
5.2.3.6
One DO exceedance of Action Level of surface
water quality at WM1 was recorded in August 2023. The Notification of
Environmental Quality Limits Exceedance is presented in Appendix
G. In
summary of the investigation, the DO exceedance in Action Level of Surface
Water Quality at WM1 may involve the vary of temperature under the hot weather.
Therefore, the exceedance is not related to project. No exceedance of Limit
Level of surface water monitoring at WM1 was recorded in August 2023. No
exceedance of Action Levels and Limit Level of surface water monitoring at WM2
were recorded in August 2023.
5.2.3.7
No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels of
surface water monitoring was recorded from September to December 2023.
5.2.4 Recommended Mitigation Measure
5.2.4.1 The recommended surface water mitigation measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
• Channels (both temporary and permanent drainage pipes and culverts), earth bunds or sand bag barriers should be provided on site to direct stormwater to silt removal facilities.
• The overall slope of the site should be kept to a minimum to reduce the erosive potential of surface water flows.
• The design of efficient silt removal facilities should be based on the guidelines in Appendix A1 of ProPECC PN 1/94, which states that the retention time for silts and sediment traps should be 5 minutes under maximum flow conditions.
• All vehicles and plant should be cleaned before leaving a construction site to ensure no earth, mud, debris and the like is deposited by them on roads.
• Construction solid waste, debris and rubbish on site should be collected, handled and disposed of properly to avoid water quality impacts.
• Measures should be taken to prevent the washing away of construction materials, soil, silt or debris into any drainage system.
5.2.5.1
Should non-compliance of the criteria occurs,
action in accordance with the action plan in Table 5-8 shall be carried
out.
Table
5-8 Event and Action Plan for Water
Quality
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Action level
being exceeded by one sampling day |
•
Repeat in situ measurement to confirm findings •
Identify source(s) of impact •
Prepare Notification of Exceedance •
Inform IEC and Contractor • Check monitoring data, all plant,
equipment and Contractor’s working methods •
Repeat measurement on next day of exceedance |
•
Verify Notification of Exceedance •
Check monitoring
data and Contractor’s working methods |
•
Rectify
unacceptable practice •
Amend working
methods if appropriate |
Action level being exceeded by two or
more consecutive sampling days |
•
Repeat in situ
measurement to confirm findings • Identify
source(s) of impact •
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance • Inform
IEC and Contractor •
Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods • Discuss
with Contractor and IEC for remedial measures • Ensure
mitigation measures are implemented • Increase
the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of Action level • Repeat measurement on next day of exceedance |
•
Verify Notification of
Exceedance • Check
monitoring data and Contractor's working method • Discuss
with ET and Contractor on possible remedial actions • Review
the proposed mitigation measures • Supervise
the implementation of mitigation measures |
• Submit
proposal of additional mitigation measures to IEC of notification • Implement
the agreed mitigation measures • Amend
proposal if appropriate |
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Limit Level being
exceeded by one sampling day |
• Repeat in situ measurement to confirm
findings •
Identify
source(s) of impact • Prepare Notification of Exceedance •
Inform IEC and
Contractor; •
Check monitoring
data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working methods •
Discuss
mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor • Ensure mitigation measure are implemented |
• Verify Notification of Exceedance •
Check monitoring
data submitted By ET and Contractor’s working method •
Discuss with ET
and Contractor on possible remedial actions •
Review the
proposed mitigation measures •
Supervise the
implementation of mitigation measures |
•
Critically review
the working method •
Rectify
unacceptable practice •
Take immediate
corrective actions to avoid further exceedance •
Submit proposal
of mitigation measures to IEC •
Implement the
agreed mitigation measures |
Limit level being exceeded by two or
more consecutive sampling days |
•
Repeat in situ
measurement to confirm findings • Identify
source(s) of impact •
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance • Inform
IEC, contractor and EPD • Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working methods • Discuss
mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor • Ensure
mitigation measure are implemented |
•
Verify Notification of
Exceedance • Check
monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor’s working method • Discuss
with ET and Contractor on possible remedial actions • Review
the proposed mitigation measures • Supervise
the implementation of mitigation measures |
• Critically
review the working method • Rectify
unacceptable practice • Take
immediate corrective actions to avoid further exceedance • Submit
proposal of mitigation measures to IEC • Implement
the agreed mitigation measures • Resubmit
proposals if problem still not under control • Slow
down or to stop relevant activity until exceedance is abated |
6.1
Wastes generated from this Project include
inert construction and demolition (C&D) materials and non-inert C&D
materials. Non-inert C&D materials were made up of general refuse, steels
and paper/cardboard packaging materials. Steel materials generated from the
Project were also grouped into non-inert C&D materials as the materials
were not disposed of with other inert C&D materials. With reference to
relevant handling records and trip tickets of this Project, the quantities of
different types of waste generated in the reporting month are summarised in Appendix G.
6.2
The recommended waste management mitigation
measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
• Implement
a trip-ticket system to ensure that the movement of C&D materials are
properly documented and verified in accordance with DEVB TC(W) No. 6/2010.
• Concrete and masonry should be used as general fill and steel reinforcement bars can be used by scrap steel mills.
• Proper areas should be designated for waste segregation and storage wherever site conditions permit.
• Maximise the use of reusable steel formwork to reduce the amount of C&D material.
• Maintain temporary stockpiles and reuse excavated fill material for backfilling and reinstatement.
• On-site sorting and segregation facility of all type of wastes is considered as one of the best practice in waste management and hence, should be implemented in all projects generating construction waste.
• The sorted public fill and C&D waste should be properly reused.
• Excavated slope, stockpiled material and bund walls should be covered by tarpaulin until used in order to prevent wind-blown dust during dry weather, and to reduce muddy runoff during wet weather.
7.1 Monitoring Requirement during Construction
Monitoring for Construction
Works
· CH4: >10% Lower Explosion Limit (LEL);
· CO2: >0.5%; and
· O2: <18% by volume.
7.2.3 For excavation works deeper than 1m, measurements should be made:
• at ground surface prior to
excavation;
• immediately before any worker enters
the excavation;
• at the beginning of each working day
for the entire period the excavation remains open; and
• periodically through the working day
whilst workers are in the excavation.
7.2.4 For excavation between 300mm and 1m deep, measurements should be made:
• directly after the excavation
has been completed; and
• periodically whilst the excavation
remains open.
7.2.6 The locations of LFG monitoring locations during reporting period
are shown in Table 7-1. The Site formation layout plan is shown
in Figure 2 and the
Layout of LFG monitoring locations is presented in Figure 3.
Table 7-1
Locations of LFG Monitoring during reporting period
Monitoring Period |
Monitoring Location |
Type of
works |
Dec 2022 |
Portion A +55 mpD Platform |
Excavation Works |
Jan to
Feb 2023 |
Portion A +58 mpD,+55 mpD Platform |
|
Mar to Jun 2023 |
Portion A +55
mpD to 70 mpD Platform |
|
Jul to Dec 2023 |
Portion A +50 mpD to 70 mpD Platform |
7.3 Monitoring Results
7.3.1 The LFG monitoring was conducted at designated location of Portion A (Conducted on working days) during the reporting period. The LFG monitoring results are summarized in Table 7-2.
Table 7-2 Summary of LFG Monitoring Results
LFG Monitoring Station |
Monitoring Date |
Monitoring Parameter(s) |
|||
CH4 in % |
LEL in %/v |
CO2 in % |
O2 in % |
||
Average Monitoring Results (Range) |
|||||
Portion A +55 mpD Platform |
Dec 2022 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.4 (20.1 – 20.8) |
Portion A +58 mpD,+55 mpD
Platform |
Jan 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.3 (20.1 – 20.6) |
Feb 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.4 (20.1 – 20.6) |
|
Portion A +55 mpD to 70 mpD Platform |
Mar 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.4 (20.2 – 20.8) |
Apr 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.2 (20.1 – 20.4) |
|
May 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.2 (20.1 – 20.3) |
|
Jun 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.2 (20.1 – 20.3) |
|
Portion A +50 mpD to 70 mpD Platform |
Jul 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.1 (20.0 – 20.2) |
Aug 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.2 (20.1– 20.4 |
|
Sep 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.2 (20.1 – 20.2) |
|
Oct 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.2 (20.1 – 20.3) |
|
Nov 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.1 (20.0 – 20.2) |
|
Dec 2023 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.1 (20.0 – 20.2) |
|
Action Level |
>10% LEL |
--- |
>0.5%** CO2 |
<19% |
|
Limit Level |
>20% LEL |
--- |
>1.5% CO2 |
<18% |
* LEL: Lower Explosive
Limit - concentrations in air below which there is not enough fuel to continue
an explosion.
** This Limit Level of CO2
at 0.5% is set for reference only, assuming no CO2 emission from a
particular location.
7.3.2 The Summary of Landfill Gas Exceedance are shown in Table 7-3.
Table 7-3 Summary
of Landfill Gas Exceedance during
the reporting period
Landfill
Gas Monitoring Station |
Portion A +55
mpD Platform |
Portion A +58 mpD,+55 mpD Platform |
Portion A +55 mpD to 70 mpD Platform |
Portion A +50 mpD to 70 mpD Platform |
|||||
Level
Exceedance Parameters |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
|
CH4 |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
CO2 |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
O2 |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal
to non-project related
7.3.3 No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels of LFG was recorded during the reporting period. Therefore, there was no record of Notification of Environmental Quality Limits Exceedance in the Appendix F.
7.4 Recommended Mitigation
Measures
7.4.1 The recommended landfill gas mitigation measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
• Special LFG precautions should be taken due to close proximity of NENT landfill extension site to existing landfill to avoid potential hazards of LFG exposure (ignition, explosion, asphyxiation, toxicity).
• Prominent safety warning signs should be erected on-site to alert all personnel and visitors of LFG hazards during excavation works.
• No smoking or burning should be permitted on-site.
• Prominent 'No smoking' and ‘No Naked Flames’ signs should be erected on-site.
• No worker should be allowed to work alone at any time in excavated trenches or confined areas on-site.
• Adequate fire fighting equipment should be provided on-site.
• Construction equipment should be equipped with vertical exhaust at least 0.6m above ground installed with spark arrestors.
• Electrical motors and extension cords should be explosion-proof and intrinsically safe for use on-site.
• ’Permit to Work' system should be implemented.
• Welding, flame-cutting or other hot works should be conducted only under ‘Permit to Work’ system following clear safety requirements, gas monitoring procedures and presence of qualified persons to supervise the works.
7.5 Event and Action Plan (EAP)
7.5.1 Should non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the action plan in Table 7-4 shall be carried out.
Table 7-4 Action Plan for the monitoring during
construction phase
Parameter |
Monitoring Result |
Action |
Oxygen (O2) |
Action Level <19% O2 |
Ventilate trench/void to restore O2
to >19% |
Limit Level <18% O2 |
Stop works Evacuate personnel/prohibit entry Increase ventilation to restore O2 to
>19% |
|
Methane (CH4) |
Action Level >10% LEL* |
Prohibit hot works Increase ventilation to restore CH4
to <10% LEL |
Limit Level >20% LEL* |
Stop works Evacuate personnel/prohibit entry Increase ventilation to restore CH4 to
<10% LEL |
|
Carbon dioxide (CO2) |
Action Level** >0.5%** CO2 |
Ventilate to restore CO2 to
<0.5% |
Limit Level >1.5% CO2 |
Stop works Evacuate personnel / prohibit entry Increase ventilation to restore CO2 to
<0.5% |
** This Action Level of CO2
at 0.5% is set for reference only, assuming no CO2 emission from a
particular location.
Depending on the baseline
CO2 levels, the Action Level at a particular location will be
changed.
8.1.2 All relevant environmental mitigation
measures listed in the approved EIA Report and the EM&A Manual, and their
implementation status are summarised in Appendix H.
9.1.1 The
Mitigation measures for preservation of the cultural landscape
feature located within the project area was conducted before commencement of
construction of the project based on the requirement of Survey Report and
Mapping Records for Boulder Paths BP1 & 2 & Conditions of G2, G4, G5
G6, G7, G8, G14, G15, G25, G26 and G27 within NENTX.
9.1.2 The
survey and mapping works carried out on 25 April 2022 and the verification works carried out on 23 August
22 confirmed that both 2 boulder paths BP1 and BP2 are fall outside the site boundary and the
Project area.
9.1.3 All the
affected graves within the waste boundary have been removed in accordance with section
119(1) of the Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance (Cap 132). Removal of the graves as
shown on Figure 2 attached to the FEP was proven by the visit of graves on 22 August 2022. All
the graves as shown on Figure 2 attached to the FEP were abandoned and removed
and no mitigation or preservation measures is necessary.
9.1.5 Implementation
of the mitigation measures such as permanent fencing to protect the boulder
path and setting up warning notices during construction phase of the Project
has been monitored through the regular site inspection/audit. The permanent
fencing locations are shown in Appendix I. In case of any
presence of undiscovered grave during construction phase, AMO will be informed
as soon as possible.
10.1.1 The
post-transplantation monitoring was conducted based on the requirement of the
approved Transplantation Proposal for Plant Species of Conservation Importance
(Rev.1). The 1st to 15th Post-transplantation Monitoring
and Audit Reports (24th November 2022 to 13th October
2023) present the details of requirements, monitoring results and site inspection
with photos. During the reporting period, the numbers, measurements, and health
conditions of the transplanted plant species are recorded. The post-transplantation monitoring had been
completed in October 2023. No further post-transplantation monitoring will be
conducted in accordance with the requirement of the approved Transplantation
Proposal for Plant Species of Conservation Importance (Rev.1).
10.1.2
In the reporting period, the post-translocation monitoring for the Endemic Freshwater Crab Somanniathelphusa
zanklon was conducted based on the requirement of the
approved Revised Translocation Proposal for the Endemic Freshwater Crab Somanniathelphusa zanklon. The 1st
to 12th Post-Translocation Monitoring Reports (November 2022 to July
2023) present the details of requirements, monitoring results and site
inspection with photos. During the reporting period, no S. zanklon individual is identified. The
post-translocation monitoring had been completed in July 2023. No further
post-translocation monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the
requirements of the Revised Translocation Proposal for the Endemic Freshwater
Crab Somanniathelphusa zanklon.
10.1.3 The
details of requirements, monitoring results and site inspection with photos for
the post-translocation monitoring and post-transplantation monitoring would be
reported separately.
Table 10-1 Milestone of the Ecological Monitoring
Type of Monitoring |
Monitoring Event No. |
Monitoring
Date |
Post-transplantation Monitoring |
1st |
24 Nov 2022 |
2nd |
9
Dec 2022 |
|
3rd |
21 Dec 2022 |
|
4th |
13
Jan 2023 |
|
5th |
26 Jan 2023 |
|
6th |
8 Feb 2023 |
|
7th |
24 Feb 2023 |
|
8th |
20 Mar 2023 |
|
9th |
21 Apr 2023 |
|
10th |
12 May 2023 |
|
11th |
16 Jun 2023 |
|
12th |
18 Jul 2023 |
|
13th |
11 Aug 2023 |
|
14th |
15 Sep 2023 |
|
15th |
13 Oct 2023 |
|
Post-translocation
Monitoring |
1st
(Aug 2022) |
29
Aug 2022 |
2nd (Sep
2022) |
28 Sep 2022 |
|
3rd
(Oct 2022) |
28
Oct 2022 |
|
4th (Nov
2022) |
22 Nov 2022 |
|
5th
(Dec 2022) |
29
Dec 2022 |
|
6th (Jan
2023) |
30 Jan 2023 |
|
7th
(Feb 2023) |
24 Feb 2023 |
|
8th (Mar
2023) |
20 Mar 2023 |
|
9th
(Apr 2023) |
19 Apr 2023 |
|
10th (May
2023) |
17 May 2023 |
|
11th
(Jun 2023) |
7 Jun 2023 |
|
12th (Jul
2023) |
12 Jul 2023 |
11 Site Inspection and Audit
11.1.1
Site Inspection and audits were carried out by
ET on weekly basis to monitor the implementation of proper environmental
management practices and mitigation measures in the Project Site.
11.1.3
Details of observations and recommendations are
summarized in Table 11-1.
Table 11-1 Observations and Recommendations of Site
Audit
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Air Quality |
12 Dec 2022 |
Reminder: The vehicle exit
road shall be kept clear of dusty materials. |
The Contractor was reminded to schedule
watering for the vehicle exist road. |
28
Dec 2022 |
Observation: The vehicle road is covered with dusty materials
in Portion A. |
The vehicle entrance shall be kept
clear of dusty materials. |
|
28 Dec 2022 |
Observation: The work area is dry and fugitive dust is
observed from loading and unloading activity in Portion D. |
The Contractor has been recommended to schedule
watering for work area and to spray with water during loading and unloading
activities. |
|
3 Jan 2023 |
Observation: The work area was dry and fugitive dust was
observed from loading and unloading activity in Portion A and Portion D. |
The Contractor has been recommended to schedule
watering for the work area. |
|
9 Jan 2023 |
Observation: The work area in SBA was observed dry
and fugitive dust was observed. |
The Contractor has been recommended to schedule
watering for work area in SBA area. |
|
16 Jan 2023 |
Reminder: The vehicle entrance was not maintained properly
in Portion A. |
The Contractor has been reminded to repave the
road section between the washing facilities and the exit point. |
|
16 Jan 2023 |
Reminder: Open stockpile was observed in Portion D. |
The Contractor has been reminded to cover the
open stockpile with impervious sheets. |
|
27 Jan 2023 |
Observation: Dusty stockpiles were observed in SBA. |
The contractor was recommended that dusty
stockpile shall be covered with impervious sheet to prevent dust dispersion. |
|
27 Jan 2023 |
Reminder: The exposed earth was dry and dusty in
Portion D. |
The Contractor has been reminded to cover the
exposed earth with impervious sheets or other means to prevent dust
dispersion. |
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Air Quality |
1 Feb 2023 |
Observation: Vehicle washing was implemented in SBA. |
The Contractor has been recommended to provide
vehicle washing facility at the exit of SBA. |
1 Feb 2023 |
Reminder: The unpaved area in Portion D was dry and dusty.
Dry and fugitive dust was observed in the work area in Portion A. |
The Contractor has been reminded to increase the frequency
of watering to the unpaved area in Portion D and work area in Portion A. |
|
1 Feb 2023 |
Reminder: The open stockpiles in SBA were not covered
with impervious sheets. |
The Contractor has been reminded to cover the
stockpile with impervious sheets. |
|
6 Feb 2023 |
Observation: Fugitive dust was observed in Portion A and D. |
The Contractor has been recommended to increase
the frequently of watering unpaved area and work area or other dust
suppression method in Portion A and D to minimize dust dispersion. |
|
13 Feb 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the
frequently of watering unpaved area and work area or other dust suppression
method in Portion A is reminded should be increased. |
The frequently of
watering unpaved area and work area or other dust suppression method in
Portion A was increased. |
|
20 Feb 2023 |
Observation: The fugitive dust was observed in Portion A. |
The Contractor was
recommended to increase the frequency of watering to the unpaved area and
work area in Portion A. |
|
20 Feb 2023 |
Observation: The lack of NRMN Label was observed in the
generator at SBA. |
The Contractor was
recommended to label the NRMN Label on the generator at SBA. |
|
27 Feb 2023 |
Observation: The site area in SBA was dry and fugitive dust was
observed. |
The Contractor has been
recommended to schedule watering and to increase the frequency of watering if
necessary in SBA. |
|
27 Feb 2023 |
Observation: Vehicle washing shall be implemented in
SBA. |
The Contractor has been recommended to implement
vehicle washing at the exit of Portion. |
|
27 Feb 2023 |
Observation: More than 20 bags of cement were not covered
entirely by impervious sheets in SBA. |
The Contractor has been recommended to
cover the cement bags entirely. |
|
27 Feb 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor has been reminded to
schedule watering for Portion D. |
The Contractor has been reminded to
schedule watering and to increase the frequency of watering if necessary in
Portion D. |
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Air Quality |
6 Mar 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded to increase the
frequency of watering at unpaved road and works area of SBA and Portion D. |
The frequency of watering at unpaved road
and works area of SBA and Portion D should be increased. |
13 Mar 2023 |
Observation: Fugitive dust was observed from the breaking and
excavation works in Portion E3-1. 1. |
The Contractor has been reminded to
spray water on surface or the dusty material during breaking and excavation
works. |
|
13 Mar 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded to increase the
frequency of watering at unpaved road and works area of Portion A. |
The frequency of watering at unpaved road
and works area of Portion A should be increased. |
|
20 Mar 2023 |
Observation: Stockpiles of dusty material are not covered with
impervious sheets. |
The Contractor has been reminded to
fully cover the stockpiles of dusty material with impervious sheets. |
|
20 Mar 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded to increase the
frequency of watering in construction site to prevent dust dispersion. |
Frequency of watering in the construction
site should be increased to prevent dust dispersion. |
|
27 Mar 2023 |
Observation: Sand and silt were observed at the vehicle entrance
in SBA. |
The contractor has been recommended
that the vehicle entrance shall be kept clear. |
|
17 Apr 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was
reminded to spray water on the surface of dusty material in SBA to prevent
dust dispersion. |
The Contractor was reminded that dusty
material shall be sprayed with water to prevent generation of dust. |
|
2
May 2023 |
Observation: Sand and silt were observed at the road leading
to SBA. |
The contractor was recommended that
road surface shall be kept clear of sand and silt. |
|
2 May 2023 |
Reminder: Dust suppression measure shall be enhanced
to cover all work area and dusty stockpiles in SBA. |
The contractor was reminded to ensure the
implementation of dust suppression measure for the dry work area and dusty
stockpile. |
|
15
May 2023 |
Observation: The accumulate of the uprooting of trees without
covered entirely by impervious sheeting or placed in an area sheltered on the
top and the 3 sides were found at the work area at SBA. |
The contractor was recommended that the
demolished trees should be covered by impervious sheeting or placed in an
area sheltered on the top and the 3 sides. |
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Air Quality |
22 May 2023 |
Observation: The unrooting trees at Portion A was not
covered by impervious sheeting and or placed in an area sheltered on the top
and the 3 sides within a day of demolition. |
The contractor was recommended that all
demolished items (including trees) should be covered entirely by impervious
sheeting or placed in an area sheltered on the top and the 3 sides within a
day of demolition. |
29
May 2023 |
Observation: Portion of road leading to Portion A and Portion
B2 shall be kept clear of dusty and muddy materials. |
The Contractor was reminded to clear dusty and
muddy material on the portion of road leading to Portion A and Portion B2. |
|
29 May 2023 |
Observation: The accumulated uprooting trees is found
behind the silt removal facilities in Portion B2. |
The accumulated uprooting trees shall be
covered with impervious sheets, placed in an area sheltered on the top and
the 3 sides or disposed properly. |
|
12
Jun 2023 |
Observation: Watering shall be scheduled in Portion A under
hot weather. |
The Contractor was recommended to schedule
watering in Portion A. |
|
26 Jun 2023 |
Reminder: The unpaved assess road was dry. |
The contractor was reminded to increase the
frequency of watering at the Portion A. |
|
3 Jul 2023 |
Observation: Dusty stockpiles in Portion A shall be
covered with impervious sheets when they are not in used. |
The Contractor was reminded to cover
the dusty stockpile with impervious sheets. |
|
31 Jul 2023 |
Observation: The slope surface at the Portion E4 shall
be coved by impervious sheet. |
The contractor was recommended that the
exposed slope at the Portion E4 should be covered by impervious sheet. The
exposed slope at the Portion E4 should be treated with shotcrete for long
term. |
|
31
Jul 2023 |
Observation: The assess road at the Portion E4 was dry. |
The contractor was advised that the assess road
at the Portion E4 should be sprayed with water when the assess road is dry to
minimize the dust suppression. The water sprinkler should be considered to
establish at the assess road of the Portion E4. |
|
28 Aug 2023 |
Observation: The work area in Portion A was dry and
dusty. |
The contractor was advised to schedule
watering in the work area and review the coverage of the water sprinkler. |
|
4
Sep 2023 |
Observation: Dust drift was found at the assess road of
Portion A when vehicle moving. |
The contractor was advised to increase the
frequency of water spraying at the assess road of Portion A. |
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Air Quality |
11 Sep 2023 |
Observation: The dusty stockpile in SBA should be
covered with impervious sheet when the rainfall is forecast. |
The Contractor was advised to cover the stockpiles
with impervious sheet when they are idle. |
18 Sep 2023 |
Observation: The demolished tree, shrub or
vegetation in Portion B2 should be covered with impervious sheets or placed
within a shelter. |
The Contractor was reminded to cover
the demolished tree, shrub or vegetation with impervious sheets or placed
within a shelter. |
|
18 Sep 2023 |
Observation: The dry PFA in Portion B2 should be covered
entirely with impervious sheets. |
The Contractor was reminded to cover dry
PFA entirely with impervious sheets. |
|
18 Sep 2023 |
Observation: The metal plate at the vehicle entrance in
Portion B2 should cover unpaved road surface in Portion B2. |
Vehicle entrance should be paved with concrete,
bituminous materials, hardcore or metal plates, and kept clear of dusty
materials. |
|
18 Sep 2023 |
Observation: The main haul road in Portion E4 was dry ad
dusty. |
The Contractor was advised to schedule watering
and recommended to install water sprinklers or mist spray in long term. |
|
25 Sep 2023 |
Observation: The main haul road and work site should be wetted
regularly to minimize the dust dispersion. |
The Contractor was reminded to switch on the
water sprinklers along the haul road in SBA and to schedule watering for
unpaved haul road and work area. The Contractor has been advised to increase
the frequency of watering if necessary under the hot weather condition to
minimize dust dispersion. |
|
16 Oct 2023 |
Reminder: The contractor was reminded to provide
regular water spraying to the haul road to control the dust level. |
The contractor was reminded to provide
regular water spraying to the haul road to control the dust level. |
|
24 Oct 2023 |
Reminder: The contractor was reminded to increase the water
spraying at the unpaved area and assess road. |
The contractor was reminded to increase the water
spraying at the unpaved area and assess road. |
|
6 Nov 2023 |
Observation: The outside surrounding of the scaffolding
without dust screen, sheeting or netting was found at the Portion D. |
The contractor was advised that the effective
dust screens, sheeting or netting should be provided to enclose the scaffolding
from the ground floor level of the building, or a canopy provided from the
first-floor level up to the highest level of the scaffolding. |
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Air Quality |
13 Nov 2023 |
Observation: The loaded dump truck without covering
impervious sheet was found at the assess road between Portion A and E4. |
The contractor was recommended to ensure all of
loaded dump trucks should be covered by impervious sheeting. |
27
Nov 2023 |
Reminder: The
contractor was reminded that water spraying shall be provided regularly for
dust control. |
The contractor was reminded that water
spraying shall be provided regularly for dust control. |
|
4 Dec 2023 |
Observation: The dust dispersion was observed in the
site. |
The contractor was advised to regularly
water the works area and provide enough sprayers to dampen the surface of
construction materials and the site, especially during the work process, to
minimize dust dispersion. |
|
11
Dec 2023 |
Observation: The accumulated uprooting of trees at portion E4
was observed. |
The contractor was advised to regularly water the
uprooted trees to prevent dust dispersion and arrange for regular disposal to
avoid accumulation. |
|
18 Dec 2023 |
Observation: Stockpiling of dusty material without
covered by impervious sheet at Portion D was observed. |
The contractor was reminded that
stockpiling of dusty material should be covered by impervious sheet at
Portion D to prevent dust dispersion. |
|
18
Dec 2023 |
Reminder: The contractor was recommended that the exposed
slope surface at SBA should be covered by an impervious sheet in the short
term and should be shotcrete or other measurements for long-term surface
protection. |
The contractor was recommended that the exposed
slope surface at SBA should be covered by an impervious sheet in the short
term and should be shotcrete or other measurements for long-term surface
protection. |
|
27 Dec 2023 |
Observation: Assess road was dry and fugitive dust was observed,
especially at portion E4. |
The contractor was recommended to arrange
watering and provide enough sprayers to minimize dust dispersion at all
assess road. |
|
27
Dec 2023 |
Observation: Exposed slope surface without covered by
tarpaulin sheets at portion E4 was observed. |
The contractor was advised that the exposed slope
surface at portion E4 should be covered by tarpaulin sheets or other
measurement like shotcrete or hydroseeding for long term slope surface
protection. |
|
27 Dec 2023 |
Observation: Dusty materials without covered by
impervious sheet at portion E4 was observed. |
The contractor was reminded that the dusty
materials should be covered with impervious sheet to prevent dust
suppression. |
|
Noise |
No specific observation was identified in the
reporting period. |
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Water Quality |
5 Dec 2022 |
Reminder: Open cut slope shall
be covered with impervious sheeting. |
The Contractor was reminded to cover the
exposed slopes with impervious sheet to minimize dust dispersion. |
12
Dec 2022 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded to cover the exposed
slope with impervious sheet for upcoming rainfall in this week. |
All exposed slopes shall be covered with
impervious sheets during rainfall. |
|
19 Dec 2022 |
Observation: Sediments are accumulated in the channel at
the vehicle wash bay. |
The Contractor was recommended to remove the
sediments at least on a weekly basis. |
|
3 Jan 2023 |
Observation: Rotten leaves and sediments were observed in the
channel at Portion D. |
The Contractor has been recommended to clean up
the channel at Portion D. |
|
16 Jan 2023 |
Reminder: The vehicle entrance was not maintained
properly in Portion A. |
Earth bund shall be provided at the vehicle
washing entrance to prevent leakage of the run-off. |
|
16 Jan 2023 |
Reminder: Sand and silt were accumulated in the channel of
the vehicle washing. |
The Contractor has been reminded to remove the
sand and silt in the channel regularly. |
|
6 Feb 2023 |
Observation: Sand and silt shall be regularly removed
from the sump pit in the vehicle washing bay in Portion A. |
The Contractor has been recommended to remove
sand and silt in the sump pit and the channel at the vehicle washing bay
regularly. |
|
27 Feb 2023 |
Observation: Construction runoff in the lower area at Portion
D shall be collected and divided to silt removal facilities. |
The Contractor has been recommended to ensure
construction runoff shall be divided into silt removal facilities. |
|
3 Apr 2023 |
Observation: The exposed surface
in Portion E3-1 shall be covered with impervious sheets to minimize surface
runoff into the stream. |
The contractor was recommended that
surface protection shall be implemented on the exposed slope to minimize
surface runoff. |
|
3
Apr 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded to maintain surface
protection work in Portion A. |
The contractor was reminded that surface
protection shall be implemented on the exposed slope to minimize surface
runoff. |
|
3 Apr 2023 |
Reminder: The contractor was reminded to ensure the
silt removal facilities functioning properly before the holidays. |
The contractor was reminded silt removal
facilities shall be maintained regularly. |
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Water Quality |
11 Apr 2023 |
Observation: The entrance of Portion A was observed
muddy. The entrance shall be kept clear of dusty and muddy material. |
The Contractor was recommended to repave the
surface of entrance to prevent accumulation of sand and silt. |
11 Apr 2023 |
Observation: Surface protection shall be applied on the
exposed slope behind the WetSep to minimize the surface runoff into the
channel. |
The contractor was recommended that the exposed
slope shall be covered with impervious sheets to prevent any surface runoff
into the channel. |
|
17 Apr 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded to ensure all
silt removal facilities functioning properly for the upcoming rainfall. |
The Contractor was reminded that silt removal
facilities shall be maintained properly. |
|
24 Apr 2023 |
Observation: The channels at the entrance of SBA are
accumulated with rotten leaves, sand and silt. |
The contractor was recommended that regular
cleaning of channel shall be conducted to prevent any clogging. |
|
24 Apr 2023 |
Reminder: Surface protection works in Portion A shall
be maintained properly. |
The contractor was recommended that earth bunds
and exposed slopes shall be paved to control the surface runoff. |
|
24 Apr 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor has been reminded to ensure all
silt removal facilities functioning properly for the upcoming rainfall in
this week. |
Silt removal facilities shall be maintained
properly and checked if they can function properly. |
|
8 May 2023 |
Observation: Accumulated sand and silt shall be cleared off in the wheel washing
bay in SBA. |
The contractor was recommended to conduct
regularly cleaning work for the wheel washing bay and to ensure the
implementation of vehicle washing in SBA. |
|
8 May 2023 |
Reminder: The
contractor was reminded to ensure all silt removal facilities functioning
properly for the upcoming rainfall and the discharged wastewater shall comply
with WPCO requirement. |
The construction and surface runoff shall be
directed to silt removal facilities and treated wastewater shall fulfil WPCO
requirement. |
|
15 May 2023 |
Observation: The accumulate water was found at the lower area at the Portion D. |
The contractor was recommended that the surface
water should be collected to silt removal facilities. |
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Water Quality |
22 May 2023 |
Observation: The sand and soil near the channel at
Portion E3-1 were found. |
The contractor was recommended to avoid the
untreated surface runoff contaminated with related materials discharged to
channel directly. All construction runoffs should be collected to silt
removal facilities for treatment. |
29 May 2023 |
Observation: Slope protection work in Portion A shall be
maintained properly to minimize dust dispersion and surface runoff. |
The Contractor was recommended to apply surface
protection on the exposed slope in Portion A. |
|
5 Jun 2023 |
Reminder: The contractor was reminded that the
particular attention should be paid to the control of silty surface runoff
during storm event in accordance with Appendix A2 of ProPECC PN 1/94. |
The contractor was reminded that the particular
attention should be paid to the control of silty surface runoff during storm
event in accordance with Appendix A2 of ProPECC PN 1/94. |
|
12 Jun 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded to ensure channel and
silt removal facilities shall be functioning properly for the upcoming
rainfall. |
Silt removal facility and channel shall be
maintained properly. |
|
19 Jun 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded to ensure silt
removal facilities shall be functioning properly for the upcoming rainfall.
Silt removal facility shall be functioning properly to ensure sufficient
treatment for all wastewater before discharging to comply with WPCO. |
The Contractor was reminded to ensure silt
removal facilities shall be functioning properly for the upcoming rainfall.
Silt removal facility shall be functioning properly to ensure sufficient
treatment for all wastewater before discharging to comply with WPCO. |
|
19 Jun 2023 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the bunding
along the slope edge shall be properly maintained to prevent surface runoff
during heavy rainfall at Portion A. Earth bund in Portion A shall be properly
maintained. |
The Contractor was reminded that the bunding
along the slope edge shall be properly maintained to prevent surface runoff
during heavy rainfall at Portion A. Earth bund in Portion A shall be properly
maintained. |
|
26 Jun 2023 |
Observation: The sediment at the drainage system and
site boundary, especially at the lower elevations should be kept cleaning
regularly. (Most of sediment was found at the lower elevations of Portion A).
The contractor should ensure no untreated construction runoff discharging
directly outside the site boundary of the project. |
The contractor was recommended that the sediment
at the drainage system and site boundary, especially at the lower elevations
should be kept cleaning regularly. |
Parameter |
Date |
Observation
and Reminders |
Follow-up
Action Taken |
Water Quality |
3 Jul 2023 |
Observation: Muddy water was
observed at the vehicular entrance in Portion A. |
The Contractor was reminded to clear the
muddy water and divert the muddy water to wastewater treatment facility. |
12 Jul 2023 |
Observation: The stagnant water, floating leaves,
deposited silt and grit were found at the sedimentation basin near the wheel
washing facilities at the Portion B1. |
The contractor was recommended that the stagnant water
should be collected to silt removal facilities for treatment before reusing
for wheel washing. The floating leaves, deposited silt and grit should be
removed regularly. |
|
12 Jul 2023 |
Observation: The exposed slope surfaces were not covered by tarpaulin sheets or
treated with shotcrete at the Portion E3-1. |
The contractor was recommended to implement the
cover works of exposed slope surfaces by tarpaulin sheets or shotcrete at the
Portion E3-1 to minimise the potential high concentration construction runoff
to silt removal facilities. |
|
18 Jul 2023 |
Observation: The earth bund along the edge of the
slope in Portion A was collapsed. The earth bund along the edge of the slope
in Portion A should be reconstructed to prevent surface runoff flowing
outside the site boundary. |
The Contractor was reminded to review the height
of the earth bund to ensure the surface runoff should not flow outside the
site boundary. |
|
24 Jul 2023 |
Observation: Dusty materials was
entering in the exist channel in Portion A. |
Earth bund or sand barriers shall be provided
along the existing channels in Portion A. |
|
24
Jul 2023 |
Observation: Earth bund shall be constructed at the
edge of the slope to prevent surface runoff flowing outside the site in
Portion A. |
The contractor was recommended to construction
earth bund along the edge of the slope in Portion A. |
|
24 Jul 2023 |
Observation: The accumulated silt and grit were found near the
sandbags barriers of the Portion E3-1 silt removal facilities. |
The contractor was advised that the silt and grit
should be removed near the sandbags barriers of the Portion E3-1 silt removal
facilities after heavy rain. |
|
24
Jul 2023 |
Reminder: The accumulated silt in sedimentation basin
Portion E3 shall be removed regularly. |
The Contractor was reminded to clear up the
accumulated silt regularly to ensure the proper function of the sedimentation
basin. |
|
24 Jul 2023 |