North East New Territories (NENT)
Landfill Extension Quarterly Environmental Monitoring and Audit
Report (No. 8) – October to December 2024 |
Contents
12 Environmental Non-conformance
13 Implementation Status on Environmental
Mitigation Measures
Figure
Location of the Project Site |
|
Impact Monitoring Locations |
|
Landfill Gas Monitoring Locations |
Appendix
Construction Programme & Construction Site Activities |
|
Project Organization Chart & Management Structure |
|
Detail Status of FEP & EP Submission |
|
Graphical Presentations |
|
Notification of Environmental Quality Limits Exceedance |
|
Waste Flow Table |
|
Environmental Mitigation Implementation Schedule (EMIS) |
|
Mitigation Measures of Cultural Landscape Features |
|
Cumulative complaint / enquiry log and Summaries of complaints and enquiry |
ES1. Aurecon Hong Kong Limited (Aurecon) was appointed to undertake the role of Environmental Team (ET) and carry out Environmental Monitoring and Audit for the North East New Territories (NENT) Landfill Extension.
ES2. The construction phase and EM&A programme of the Project commenced on 1 December 2022.
ES3. This 8th Quarterly EM&A Report presents the EM&A works conducted from 1 October to 31 December 2024 in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual.
Summary of Construction Works undertaken
during Report Period
ES4. The major construction works undertaken during the reporting period include:
ES Table1
Major Construction Works undertaken during
the Reporting Period
Reporting Month |
|||
Oct
2024 |
Nov
2024 |
Dec
2024 |
|
- Material
loading and unloading, site traffic at Portion A, SBA to
alternative disposal ground |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Construction of site buildings at Portion D |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Site
clearance at Portion A, B2/E1,
E3-1 & E4 |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Installation of
permanent fencing at Portion A, B1 & E4 |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Site
formation at Portion A, B2/E1,
E3-1 & E4 |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Tree
felling at whole site |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Shotcreting (Permanent and
Temporary) at whole site |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Soil
nail installation at Portion A, B2/E1 & E4 |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Installation
of minipile at Portion A |
|
|
✓ |
Construction
of RE wall at Portion E3-1 |
|
|
✓ |
Environmental Exceedance
Air Quality, Noise, Surface Water Quality & Landfill Gas
Monitoring
ES5. No exceedance of the Action and Limit Levels were recorded at designated monitoring stations during the reporting period.
Environmental
Non-conformance/Compliant/Summons and Prosecution
ES6. No non-conformance event & summons/prosecutions were recorded and received in this reporting period. One environmental complaint regarding the water quality was recorded on 28 November 2024. The relevant investigation is conducting by the related parties. The investigation results will be presented when the investigation has been completed.
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
1.1.1 The North East New Territories Landfill Extension (the NENTX Project) is located adjacent to the existing North East New Territories (NENT) Landfill at Ta Kwu Ling. The extension site is located in a valley covering mainly the existing NENT Landfill Stockpile and Borrow Area that was formed to the east of the existing landfill as part of the original site development of the landfill, and layout plan shown in Figure 1.
1.1.2 The NENTX is a designated project. The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (AEIAR-111/2007) and an Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual were approved on 20 September 2007. The project is governed by an Environmental Permit (EP) (EP-292/2007) which was granted on 26 November 2007. A further of EP (FEP) was applied and the FEP (FEP-01/292/2007) was subsequently granted on 28 April 2022. Another further of EP (FEP-02/292/2007) was subsequently granted on 23 August 2023. The Updated EM&A Manual was approved by Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) on 4 January 2024.
1.1.3 In accordance with the requirements specified in Section 2.7 to 2.11 and Section 12.3 of the Updated EM&A Manual, Quarterly EM&A report should be submitted to the DEP within 10 working days after the end of the reporting quarter. The submissions shall be certified by the Environmental Team (ET) Leader and verified by the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC).
1.1.4 The construction phase and EM&A programme of the Project commenced on 1 December 2022.
1.2 Nature, Scale and Scope of the captioned Designated Project
1.2.1 The Nature, Scale and Scope of the captioned Designated Project is presented in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1 Nature, Scale and Scope of the captioned
Designated Project
Item(s) |
Content |
Nature of Designated
Project |
Construction and operation of a landfill for waste as defined in the
“Waste Disposal Ordinance” (Cap. 354) |
Scale and Scope of Designated Project |
The Project mainly consists of the followings: - Construction and operation of a landfill extension of about 70 hectares
with a target void space of at least 19 million cubic metres on the eastern
side of the existing NENT Landfill, including the followings: - i.
Site formation and
preparation; ii. Installation of liner system; iii. Installation of leachate collection, treatment and disposal facilities; iv. Installation of gas collection, utilization and management facilities; v. Utilities provisions and drainage diversion; vi. Landfilling operation; vii. Restoration and aftercare in subsequent stages; and viii.
Measures to mitigate environmental
impacts as well as environmental monitoring and auditing to be implemented. |
1.3 Purpose of this Report
1.3.1 This is the 8th Quarterly EM&A Report which summarises the impact monitoring results and audit findings for the EM&A programme during the reporting period from 01 October to 31 December 2024.
1.4.1 The structure of the report is as follows:
-
details the background, purpose and structure of the report.
Section 2 – Project Information
-
summarises background and scope of the Project, site description, project
organization and contact details, construction programme, the construction
works undertaken and the status of Environmental Permit(s)/License(s) during
the reporting period.
Section 3 – Air Quality Monitoring
Section 5 – Water Quality Monitoring
Section 6 – Waste Management
Section
7 – Landfill Gas Monitoring
Section 8 – Landscape and Visual
Section 10 – Ecological Monitoring
Section 11 – Site Inspection and Audit
Section 12 – Environmental Non-Conformance
Section 13 – Implementation Status on Environmental Mitigation Measures
Section 14 – Conclusion
2.1.1 A summary of the major construction activities undertaken in this reporting period is shown in Table 2-1. Construction programme and detailed construction activities are illustrated in Appendix A.
Table 2-1 Major
Construction Activities Undertaken in the Reporting Period
Construction
Activities Undertaken |
Reporting
Month |
||
Oct
2024 |
Nov 2024 |
Dec 2024 |
|
- Material
loading and unloading, site traffic at Portion A, SBA to
alternative disposal ground |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Construction of site
buildings at Portion D |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Site
clearance at Portion A, B2/E1,
E3-1 & E4 |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Installation of
permanent fencing at Portion A, B1 & E4 |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Site
formation at Portion A, B2/E1,
E3-1 & E4 |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
- Tree
felling at whole site |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Shotcreting (Permanent and
Temporary) at whole site |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Soil
nail installation at Portion A, B2/E1 & E4 |
✓ |
✓ |
✓ |
Installation
of minipile at Portion A |
|
|
✓ |
Construction
of RE wall at Portion E3-1 |
|
|
✓ |
2.2 Project Organization & Management Structure
2.2.1 The Project Organization Chart & Management Structure are shown in Appendix B. The key personnel contact information is summarized in Table 2-2.
Table 2-2 Contact Information of Key Personnel
Party |
Name |
Contact Number |
Contractor (Veolia Hong Kong Holding Ltd.) |
Mr. Matt Choy |
2902 5296 |
Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) (Meinhardt Infrastructure
and Environment Ltd.) |
Ms. Claudine Lee |
2859 5409 |
Environmental Team Leader
(ETL) (Aurecon Hong Kong
Limited) |
Mr. Fredrick Leong |
3664 6888 |
2.3 Status of Submission required under the FEP & EP during reporting period
2.3.1 The status of statutory environmental compliance with the EP & FEP conditions under the EIAO, submission status under the EP & FEP during reporting period are presented in Table 2-3. The detail status of statutory environmental compliance with the EP & FEP conditions under the EIAO, submission status under the EP & FEP for NENTX project are shown in Appendix C.
Table 2-3 Status of Submissions required under the EP & FEP during reporting period
EP Condition |
FEP Condition |
Submission / Measures |
Status |
2.3 |
2.1 |
Management Organization of Main
Construction Companies |
Submitted |
2.4 |
2.2 |
Setting up of Community Liaison Group
(CLG) |
Community Liaison Group
was set up. |
2.5 |
2.3 |
Submission of EM&A Manual |
Submitted |
2.6 |
2.4 |
Submission of Preservation of Cultural
Landscape Features |
Submitted |
2.7 |
2.5 |
Submission of Vegetation Survey
(Transplantation Proposal) |
Submitted |
2.8 |
2.6 |
Submission of Translocation Proposal |
Submitted |
2.9 |
2.7 |
Submission of Transplantation Report
and Post-Transplantation Monitoring |
Submitted |
2.10 |
2.8 |
Submission of Translocation Report and
Post-Translocation Monitoring |
Submitted |
2.11 |
2.9 |
Submission of Detailed Landfill Gas
Hazard Assessment Report |
Submitted |
2.12 |
2.10 |
Submission of Waste Management Plan |
Submitted |
3.2 |
3.2 |
Submission of Baseline Monitoring
Report |
Submitted |
3.3 |
3.3 |
Submission of Monthly EM&A Report |
23rd report (Oct
2024) 24th report (Nov
2024) 25th report (Dec
2024) |
2.4 Status of Environmental Approval Document
2.4.1 A summary of the relevant valid permits, licences, and/or notifications on environmental protection for this Project since the granting of the EP & FEP is presented in Table 2-4.
Reference |
Expiry
Date |
Remark |
|
Environmental Permit (EP) |
EP-292/2007 |
Throughout the Contract |
Permit granted on 26 November 2007 |
Further Environmental Permit (FEP) |
FEP-01/292/2007 |
Throughout the Contract |
Permit granted on 28 April 2022 |
FEP-02/292/2007 |
Throughout the Contract |
Permit granted on 23
August 2023 |
|
Notification of Construction
Works as required under Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
479809 |
Throughout the Construction
Phase |
Notified on 13 May 2022 |
Registration of Waste Producer
under Waste Disposal Ordinance |
7043692 |
Throughout the Contract |
Registered on 13 April 2022 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RN1050-24 |
18 December 2024 |
Permit granted on 6 September 2024 |
GW-RN1455-24 |
18 March 2025 |
Permit granted on 11 December 2024 |
|
Registration as Chemical Waste
Producer |
5213-642-P1034-18 |
Throughout the Contract |
Registered on 11 July 2022 |
Effluent Discharge License
under Water Pollution Control Ordinance |
WT00042301-2022 |
31 October 2027 |
Permit granted on 18 October
2022 Variation of Licence (Permit granted on 7 February
2023) |
3.1.1.1
In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual, 1-hr & 24-hr Total Suspended Particulates (TSP)
levels should be measured at the designated air quality monitoring stations in
every 6 days to ensure that any deteriorating air quality could be readily detected,
and timely action shall be undertaken to rectify such situation. For 1-hr TSP
monitoring, the sampling frequency of at least three times in every six-days
should be undertaken when the highest dust impact occurs. The specific time to
start and stop the 24- hr TSP monitoring shall be clearly defined for each
location.
3.1.2
Monitoring
Parameters, Frequency and Location
3.1.2.1
According to the Updated EM&A
Manual, three monitoring stations namely AM(D)1, AM(D)2 and AM(D)3 are selected
for the impact monitoring.
3.1.2.2 A baseline monitoring plan has been submitted to IEC and EPD on 31 May 2022 including the proposal with justification of change of monitoring locations. Due to limited access to the original monitoring locations at AM(D)1, AM(D)2 and AM(D)3, the adjusted stations at AM1, AM2 and AM3 were agreed with IEC prior to the baseline and impact monitoring. The locations of adjusted dust monitoring locations are shown in Figure 2.
3.1.2.3 The locations of dust monitoring stations are shown in Table 3-1. The monitoring parameters, frequency and duration are shown in Table 3-2.
Table 3-1 Locations of Dust Monitoring Stations
Monitoring Station |
Representative for |
Monitoring Parameters |
|
AM1 |
Tung Lo Hang |
1-hr and
24-hr TSP |
|
AM2 |
Heung Yuen Wai |
1-hr and 24-hr TSP |
|
AM3 |
Wo Keng Shan Tsuen |
1-hr and
24-hr TSP |
Remarks:
The contractor passed
correspondence including original monitoring locations specified on the Approved
EM&A Manual to the village representatives on 26 April 2022. After a
meeting with Ta Kwu Ling District Rural Committee
(RC) Chairman, representative from the RC and a few villagers on 1 May 2022,
all the Village Heads of Wo Keng Shan Tsuen, Heung Yuen Wai and Lin Ma Hang
verbally refused to accept our proposal for installation of dust and / or noise
monitoring equipment within or next to their villages, for the baseline &
impact monitoring.
AM(D)1 Tung Lo
Hang, AM(D)2 Heung Yuen Wai, AM(D)3 Wo Keng Shan Tsuen are the air monitoring
stations for the construction phase EM&A programme as identified in the
approved EM&A Manual for the Project. The access to Tung Lo Hang, Heung
Yuen Wai and Wo Keng Shan Tsuen were denied.
A search for alternative air monitoring locations (AM1, AM2 & AM3)
was carried out during the site visit.
The Baseline
Monitoring Plan has been submitted to IEC and EPD including the proposal of
change of monitoring locations on 31 May 2022. This arrangement was conducted
between baseline and impact monitoring and has been agreed by the Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) and no comment received from EPD.
Due to the
adjustment of the location of AM(D)1, AM(D)2 & AM(D)3to AM1, AM2 & AM3,
the measured air quality levels at AM1, AM2 & AM3 would represent the air
quality levels at AM(D)1, AM(D)2 & AM(D)3.
Table 3-2 Dust
Impact Monitoring Parameters, Frequency and Duration
Monitoring
Station |
Parameter |
Frequency and Duration |
AM1, AM2, AM3 |
1-hr TSP |
At least 3 times per 6 days |
24-hr TSP |
1 time per 6 days |
3.1.3 Monitoring Results
3.1.3.1 The impact dust monitoring results are summarized in Table 3-3 and Table 3-4. The graphical presentations of monitoring data are presented in Appendix D.
Month |
Average
1-hr TSP Concentration, µg/m³ (Range) |
||
Dust Monitoring Station |
|||
AM1 |
AM2 |
AM3 |
|
Oct 2024 |
24 (18 – 31) |
38 (31 – 44) |
46 (38 – 56) |
Nov 2024 |
26 (20 – 30) |
34 (21 – 41) |
44 (36 – 51) |
Dec 2024 |
26 (20 – 30) |
42 (38 – 50) |
41 (38 – 43) |
Action Level |
>285 |
>279 |
>285 |
Limit Level |
>500 |
Month |
Average
24-hr TSP Concentration, µg/m³ (Range) |
||
Dust Monitoring Station |
|||
AM1 |
AM2 |
AM3 |
|
Oct 2024 |
114 (104 – 126) |
122 (114 – 136) |
127 (119 – 137) |
Nov 2024 |
103 (97 – 115) |
113 (92 – 131) |
116 (104 – 132) |
Dec 2024 |
82 (77 – 93) |
103 (91 – 116) |
115 (108 – 120) |
Action Level |
>164 |
>152 |
>163 |
Limit Level |
>260 |
3.1.3.2 The Summary of Impact 1-hr & 24-hr TSP Exceedance are shown in Table 3-5.
Dust
Monitoring Station |
AM1 |
AM2 |
AM3 |
||||
Level
Exceedance Parameters |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
|
1-hr TSP |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
24-hr TSP |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal
to non-project related
3.1.3.3 No Action / Limit Level exceedance for 1-hr & 24-hr TSP impact monitoring at AM1, AM2 & AM3 was recorded during the reporting period. The Notification of Environmental Quality Limits Exceedances are presented in Appendix E.
3.1.4
Recommended
Mitigation Measures
3.1.4.1 The recommended dust mitigation measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
• The contractor shall follow the procedures and requirements given in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation.
• Dust emission from construction vehicle movement is confined within the worksites area.
• Watering facilities will be provided at every designated vehicular exit point.
• Good site practice is recommended during construction phase.
3.1.5.1 Should non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the action plan in Table 3-6 shall be carried out.
Table 3-6 Event and
Action Plan for dust impact
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Action Level |
|||
Exceedance for one sample |
• Identify source • Prepare Notification of Exceedance • Inform IEC and Contractor • Repeat measurement to confirm findings • Increase monitoring frequency to daily
if exceedance is due to the Project and continue until the monitoring results
reduce to below action level |
• Verify the Notification of Exceedance • Check monitoring data submitted by ET and
Contractor's working methods • Discuss with ET and Contractor on proposed remedial
measures |
• Rectify any unacceptable practice • Amend working methods if appropriate |
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
• Identify source • Prepare Notification of Exceedance • Inform Contractor and IEC • Repeat measurements to confirm
findings •
Increase
monitoring frequency to daily if exceedance is due to the Project and continue
until the monitoring results reduce to below action level • Discuss with IEC for remedial action
required • Ensure remedial measures are properly
implemented • Continue monitoring at daily intervals
if exceedance is due to the Project • If no exceedance for 3 consecutive days,
cease additional monitoring |
• Verify the Notification of Exceedance • Check monitoring data submitted by ET
and Contractor's working methods • Discuss with ET and Contractor on
proposed remedial measures • Review with analysed results submitted
by ET • Review the proposed remedial measures
by Contractor • Supervise the implementation of
remedial measures |
• Submit proposals for remedial actions
to IEC within 3 working days of notification • Implement the agreed proposals • Amend proposal if appropriate |
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Limit Level |
|||
Exceedance
for one sample |
• Identify source • Prepare Notification of Exceedance • Inform IEC and Contractor • Repeat measurement to confirm findings •
Increase
monitoring frequency to daily if exceedance is due to the Project and
continue until the monitoring results reduce to below limit level • Assess effectiveness of Contractor's
remedial actions and keep EPD and IEC informed of the results |
• Verify the Notification of Exceedance • Check monitoring data submitted by ET and
Contractor's working methods • Discuss with ET and Contractor potential remedial
actions • Supervise the implementation of remedial measures |
• Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance • Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC within
3 working days of notification • Implement the agreed proposals • Amend proposal if appropriate |
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
•
Identify source •
Prepare Notification of Exceedance •
Inform IEC and EPD the causes and actions taken for the
exceedances •
Discuss with IEC for remedial action required •
Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented •
Assess effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep
IEC, EPD and informed of the results •
Increase monitoring frequency to confirm findings •
If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
•
Verify the Notification of Exceedance •
Check monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor's working
methods •
Discuss amongst ET and Contractor on the potential remedial
actions. •
Review Contractor's remedial actions whenever necessary to
assure their effectiveness •
Supervise the implementation of remedial measures |
•
Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance •
Submit proposals for remedial actions to IEC of notification •
Implement the agreed proposals •
Resubmit proposals if problem still not under control •
Stop the relevant activity of works until the exceedance is
abated |
4.1.1
In
accordance with the Updated EM&A manual, noise impact monitoring shall
be carried out at 2 monitoring stations NM1 and NM2 once a week during normal
construction working hour (0700-1900 Monday to Saturday). The minimum logging
interval shall be 30 minutes with average of 6 consecutive Leq
(5 mins), L10 and L90 shall also
be measured at 5 mins intervals.
4.2
Monitoring
Locations, Parameters and Frequency
4.2.1
According
to the Updated EM&A
Manual, two monitoring stations namely NM1 and NM2 are selected for the impact monitoring.
4.2.2
A baseline
monitoring plan has been submitted to IEC and EPD on 31 May 2022 including the
proposal with justification of change of monitoring locations. Due to limited
access to the original monitoring locations at NM1 and NM2, the adjusted
stations at NM1a and NM2a were agreed with IEC prior to the baseline and impact
monitoring. The noise monitoring locations are summarized in Table 4-1
and shown in Figure 2. The
frequency and duration are shown in Table 4-2.
Monitoring
Station |
Representative
for |
Type of
Measurement |
NM1a |
Wo Keng Shan Tsuen |
Free field |
NM2a |
Lin Ma Hang |
Free field |
The contractor passed correspondence including original
monitoring locations specified on the Approved EM&A Manual to the village
representatives on 26 April 2022. After a meeting with Ta Kwu
Ling District Rural Committee (RC) Chairman, representative from the RC and a
few villagers on 1 May 2022, all the Village Heads of Wo Keng Shan Tsuen, Heung
Yuen Wai and Lin Ma Hang verbally refused to accept our proposal for
installation of dust and / or noise monitoring equipment within or next to
their villages, for the baseline & impact monitoring.
NM1 Wo Keng Shan Tsuen & NM2 Lin Ma Hang are the noise
monitoring stations for the construction phase EM&A programme as identified
in the approved EM&A Manual for the Project. The access to Tung Lo Hang,
Heung Yuen Wai and Wo Keng Shan Tsuen were denied. A search for alternative noise monitoring
locations (NM1a & NM2a) was carried out during the site visit.
The Baseline Monitoring Plan has been submitted to IEC and
EPD including the proposal of change of monitoring locations on 31 May 2022. This
arrangement was conducted between baseline and impact monitoring and has been
agreed by the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) and no comments received
from EPD. Noise measurement at NM1a & NM2a will be considered as free-field
and a correction of +3dB(A) would be made to the noise monitoring results.
Due to the adjustment of the location of NM1 & NM2 to
NM1a & NM2a, the measured noise levels at NM1 & NM2 would represent the
noise levels at NM1 & NM2.
Monitoring Station
|
Parameter
|
Frequency and Duration
|
NM1a and NM2a |
LAeq (30mins) average of 6 consecutive LAeq
(5min); LA10(5min) & LA90(5min) |
Once a week during normal construction working hour (0700-1900
Monday to Saturday) |
4.3.1
The impact
noise monitoring results are summarized in Table 4-3. The graphical
presentations of monitoring data are presented in Appendix D.
Month |
Average
Leq, 30min, dB(A) (Range) |
|
Noise Monitoring Station |
||
NM1a |
NM2a |
|
Oct 2024 |
60.2 (59.5 – 61.2) |
53.2 (49.6 – 54.1) |
Nov 2024 |
60.0 (58.9 – 60.9) |
53.8 (53.1 – 54.7) |
Dec 2024 |
58.7 (51.8 – 60.1) |
55.2 (53.7 – 56.3) |
Action Level |
When one documented
complaint is received |
|
Limit Level |
>75dB(A) |
Remark:
(1) * A correction of +3 dB(A)
was made to the free field measurements
(2) If works are to be carried
out during restricted hours, the conditions stipulated in the construction
noise permit issued by the Noise Control Authority have to be followed.
4.3.2
No
exceedance of Action and Limit Levels of construction noise was recorded during
the reporting period. Therefore, there was no record of Notification of
Environmental Quality Limits Exceedance in the Appendix E.
4.3.3
No
particular observations are identified near the monitoring stations during the
monitoring period.
4.4
Recommended
Mitigation Measures
4.4.1 The recommended noise mitigation measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
1. Use of good site practices to limit noise emissions by considering the following:
• Only well-maintained plant should be operated on-site and plant should be serviced regularly during the construction programme;
• Machines and plant (such as trucks, cranes) that may be in intermittent use should be shut down between work periods or should be throttled down to a minimum;
• Plant known to emit noise strongly in one direction, where possible, be orientated so that the noise is directed away from nearby NSRs;
• Silencers or mufflers on construction equipment should be properly fitted and maintained during the construction works;
• Mobile plant should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible and practicable;
• Material stockpiles, mobile container site officer and other structures should be effectively utilised, where practicable, to screen noise from on-site construction activities.
2. Select “Quiet plants” which comply with the BS 5228 Part 1 or TM standards.
4.5.1
Should
non-compliance of the criteria occurs, action in accordance with the action
plan in Table 4-4 shall be carried out.
Table 4-4 Event and action plan for
construction noise monitoring
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Action Level |
•
Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance •
Prepare Notification of Exceedance •
Inform IEC and Contractor •
Report the results of investigation to IEC, and Contractor •
Discuss with Contractor and IEC for formulate remedial measures •
Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented • Have additional monitoring if exceedance
is due to the Project. If exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
•
Verify the Notification of Exceedance •
Review the analysed results submitted by ET • Discuss with ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial
actions •
Review the proposed remedial measures • Supervise the implementation of remedial
measures |
•
Submit noise mitigation proposals to IEC •
Implement the agreed noise mitigation proposals |
Exceedance
of Limit Level |
•
Identify
source, investigate the causes of exceedance •
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance •
Inform IEC and
Contractor •
Repeat
measurements to confirm findings •
Discuss with
Contractor and IEC for remedial measures •
Ensure remedial
measures are properly implemented •
Assess
effectiveness of Contractor’s remedial actions and keep IEC and EPD informed
of the results •
Have additional
monitoring if exceedance is due to the Project. If exceedance stops, cease
additional monitoring |
•
Verify the
Notification of Exceedance •
Review the
analysed results submitted by ET • Discuss
with ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions • Review the proposed remedial measures • Supervise
the implementation of remedial measures |
• Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance • Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IEC of notification • Implement
the agreed proposals • Resubmit
proposals if problem still not under control • Stop
the relevant portion of works as determined by project proponent until the
exceedance is abated. |
5.1.1.1
In
accordance with the Updated EM&A manual, groundwater quality
monitoring shall be carried out at least once per month at the 35 designated
groundwater monitoring locations (i.e. ED1 to ED35). Based on the existing
construction programme, site clearance and site formation works for future
landfilling area are in progress. The groundwater monitoring locations ED1 to
ED35 will be installed after the site formation work of the landfilling area. No
groundwater monitoring is required before the completion of site formation work
of the landfilling area.
5.2.1.1
In
accordance with the Updated EM&A
manual, impact surface water quality monitoring was carried out at the two
designated surface water discharge points (i.e. WM1 and WM2) for once per month from
commencement of construction works of the Project.
5.2.2
Monitoring
Locations, Parameters and Frequency
5.2.2.1
Impact
surface water monitoring was carried out at WM1 and WM2. The monitoring
locations are indicated in Table 5-1 and Figure 2.
5.2.2.2
The
monitoring parameters, frequency and duration of surface water quality
monitoring are summarized in Table 5-2.
Table 5-1 Surface water quality monitoring locations
Monitoring Station
|
Location
|
Coordinates (HK Grid)
|
|
Easting
|
Northing
|
||
WM1 |
Upstream of Lin Ma Hang River |
836665 |
845020 |
WM2 |
Ping Yuen River |
835592 |
844186 |
Table 5-2 Surface water quality monitoring Parameters, Frequency and
Duration
Parameter
|
Frequency
|
pH, Electrical conductivity, DO, Turbidity,
SS, Alkalinity, COD, BOD5, TOC, Ammonia-nitrogen, TKN, Nitrate,
Sulphate, Sulphite, Phosphate, Chloride, Sodium, Mg, Ca, K, Fe, Ni, Zn, Mn,
Cu, Pb, Cd, Coliform Count, Oil and Grease |
Once per month |
5.2.3.1
The summary of monitoring results is presented
in Table 5-3 & Table 5-4. Detailed graphical presentations at
each monitoring station of surface water quality (DO, SS and Turbidity) at the
monitoring stations are given in Appendix D.
Table 5-3 Summary
of Impact Surface Water Monitoring
Results at WM1
Monitoring Parameter(s) |
Monitoring
Station WM1 |
||||
Monitoring Results |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|||
Oct 2024 |
Nov 2024 |
Dec 2024 |
|||
pH |
7.2 |
6.4 |
7.0 |
>7.7 |
>7.8 |
DO in mg/L |
8.2 |
7.5 |
7.7 |
<7.4 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
2.9 |
4.7 |
1.3 |
>9.2 |
>9.5 |
Electrical Conductivity in μS/cm |
57 |
63 |
52 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
2.7 |
6.6 |
2.8 |
>9.7 |
>11.4 |
Alkalinity in mg/L |
16 |
17 |
14 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
6 |
8 |
5 |
||
BOD5 in mg/L |
2.0 |
2.0 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
1 |
3 |
<1 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen in mg/L |
0.02 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.2 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
||
Nitrate in mg/L |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
2 |
2 |
3 |
||
Sulphite in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus in mg/L |
0.01 |
<0.01 |
0.01 |
||
Chloride in mg/L |
6 |
7 |
6 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
7290 |
8470 |
7460 |
||
Magnesium in µg/L |
470 |
450 |
410 |
||
Calcium in µg/L |
3100 |
3520 |
3070 |
||
Potassium in µg/L |
360 |
590 |
350 |
||
Iron in µg/L |
250 |
580 |
430 |
||
Nickel in µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
<1 |
||
Zinc in µg/L |
<10 |
39 |
<10 |
||
Manganese in µg/L |
22 |
42 |
36 |
||
Copper in µg/L |
1.0 |
12.0 |
2.0 |
||
Lead in µg/L |
<1 |
1.0 |
<1 |
||
Cadmium in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform Count
in cfu/100mL |
290 |
18000 |
41 |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Remarks:
“TBC” equal to To Be Confirm
Table 5-4 Summary of Impact Surface Water Monitoring Results at WM2
Monitoring Parameter(s) |
Monitoring
Station WM2 |
||||
Monitoring Results |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|||
Oct 2024 |
Nov 2024 |
Dec 2024 |
|||
pH |
7.2 |
6.4 |
7.0 |
>7.6 |
>7.7 |
DO in mg/L |
8.0 |
6.2 |
7.7 |
<5 |
<4 |
Turbidity in NTU |
5.6 |
12.9 |
79.1 |
>108.3 |
>108.9 |
Electrical Conductivity in μS/cm |
155 |
163 |
199 |
--- |
--- |
SS in mg/L |
4.6 |
22.2 |
87.2 |
>94.5 |
>94.7 |
Alkalinity in mg/L |
28 |
45 |
56 |
--- |
|
COD in mg/L |
7 |
8 |
26 |
||
BOD5 in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
TOC in mg/L |
2 |
2 |
3 |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen in mg/L |
0.20 |
0.22 |
0.12 |
||
TKN in mg/L |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
||
Nitrate in mg/L |
0.13 |
0.26 |
0.22 |
||
Sulphate in mg/L |
12 |
15 |
24 |
||
Sulphite in mg/L |
<2 |
<2 |
<2 |
||
Phosphorus in mg/L |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
<0.01 |
||
Chloride in mg/L |
5 |
10 |
10 |
||
Sodium in µg/L |
5560 |
7890 |
7910 |
||
Magnesium in µg/L |
910 |
1280 |
1660 |
||
Calcium in µg/L |
11600 |
18700 |
24500 |
||
Potassium in µg/L |
1370 |
2770 |
3360 |
||
Iron in µg/L |
1200 |
2640 |
4150 |
||
Nickel in µg/L |
<1 |
<1 |
2 |
||
Zinc in µg/L |
23 |
30 |
59 |
||
Manganese in µg/L |
678 |
959 |
844 |
||
Copper in µg/L |
2 |
4 |
8 |
||
Lead in µg/L |
<1 |
2 |
9 |
||
Cadmium in µg/L |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
<0.2 |
||
Coliform Count
in cfu/100mL |
450 |
1400 |
4700 |
||
Oil and Grease in mg/L |
<5 |
<5 |
<5 |
Remarks:
“TBC” equal to To Be Confirm
5.2.3.2
The Summary of Impact Surface Water Quality
Exceedance are shown in Table 5-5.
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Station |
WM1 |
WM2 |
|||
Level Exceedance Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
pH |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
DO |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Turbidity |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
SS |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal to non-project related
5.2.3.3
No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels of
surface water monitoring was recorded during the reporting period. The
Notification of Environmental Quality Limits Exceedance is presented in Appendix E.
5.2.4
Recommended Mitigation Measure
5.2.4.1 The recommended surface water mitigation measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
• Channels (both temporary and permanent drainage pipes and culverts), earth bunds or sand bag barriers should be provided on site to direct stormwater to silt removal facilities.
• The overall slope of the site should be kept to a minimum to reduce the erosive potential of surface water flows.
• The design of efficient silt removal facilities should be based on the guidelines in Appendix A1 of ProPECC PN 1/94, which states that the retention time for silts and sediment traps should be 5 minutes under maximum flow conditions.
• All vehicles and plant should be cleaned before leaving a construction site to ensure no earth, mud, debris and the like is deposited by them on roads.
• Construction solid waste, debris and rubbish on site should be collected, handled and disposed of properly to avoid water quality impacts.
• Measures should be taken to prevent the washing away of construction materials, soil, silt or debris into any drainage system.
5.2.5.1
Should non-compliance of the criteria occurs,
action in accordance with the action plan in Table 5-6 shall be carried
out.
Table 5-6 Event
and Action Plan for Water Quality
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Action level being exceeded by one sampling day |
• Repeat in situ measurement to confirm
findings • Identify source(s) of impact • Prepare Notification of Exceedance • Inform IEC and Contractor • Check monitoring data, all plant,
equipment and Contractor’s working methods • Repeat measurement on next day of
exceedance |
• Verify Notification of Exceedance •
Check monitoring
data and Contractor’s working methods |
•
Rectify
unacceptable practice •
Amend working
methods if appropriate |
Action level being exceeded by two or
more consecutive sampling days |
•
Repeat in situ
measurement to confirm findings • Identify
source(s) of impact •
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance • Inform
IEC and Contractor •
Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor’s working methods • Discuss
with Contractor and IEC for remedial measures • Ensure
mitigation measures are implemented • Increase
the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of Action level • Repeat measurement on next day of exceedance |
•
Verify Notification of
Exceedance • Check
monitoring data and Contractor's working method • Discuss
with ET and Contractor on possible remedial actions • Review
the proposed mitigation measures • Supervise
the implementation of mitigation measures |
• Submit
proposal of additional mitigation measures to IEC of notification • Implement
the agreed mitigation measures • Amend
proposal if appropriate |
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Limit Level being exceeded by one sampling day |
• Repeat in situ measurement to confirm
findings •
Identify
source(s) of impact • Prepare Notification of Exceedance •
Inform IEC and
Contractor; •
Check monitoring
data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working methods •
Discuss
mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor • Ensure mitigation measure are implemented |
• Verify Notification of Exceedance •
Check monitoring
data submitted By ET and Contractor’s working method •
Discuss with ET
and Contractor on possible remedial actions •
Review the
proposed mitigation measures •
Supervise the
implementation of mitigation measures |
•
Critically review
the working method •
Rectify unacceptable
practice •
Take immediate
corrective actions to avoid further exceedance •
Submit proposal
of mitigation measures to IEC •
Implement the
agreed mitigation measures |
Limit level being exceeded by two or
more consecutive sampling days |
•
Repeat in situ
measurement to confirm findings • Identify
source(s) of impact •
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance • Inform
IEC, contractor and EPD • Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working methods • Discuss
mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor • Ensure
mitigation measure are implemented |
•
Verify Notification of
Exceedance • Check
monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor’s working method • Discuss
with ET and Contractor on possible remedial actions • Review
the proposed mitigation measures • Supervise
the implementation of mitigation measures |
• Critically
review the working method • Rectify
unacceptable practice • Take
immediate corrective actions to avoid further exceedance • Submit
proposal of mitigation measures to IEC • Implement
the agreed mitigation measures • Resubmit
proposals if problem still not under control • Slow
down or to stop relevant activity until exceedance is abated |
6.1
Wastes generated from this Project include
inert construction and demolition (C&D) materials and non-inert C&D
materials. Non-inert C&D materials were made up of general refuse, steels
and paper/cardboard packaging materials. Steel materials generated from the
Project were also grouped into non-inert C&D materials as the materials
were not disposed of with other inert C&D materials. With reference to
relevant handling records and trip tickets of this Project, the quantities of
different types of waste generated in the reporting month are summarised in Appendix F.
6.2
The recommended waste management mitigation
measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
• Implement
a trip-ticket system to ensure that the movement of C&D materials are
properly documented and verified in accordance with DEVB TC(W) No. 6/2010.
• Concrete and masonry should be used as general fill and steel reinforcement bars can be used by scrap steel mills.
• Proper areas should be designated for waste segregation and storage wherever site conditions permit.
• Maximise the use of reusable steel formwork to reduce the amount of C&D material.
• Maintain temporary stockpiles and reuse excavated fill material for backfilling and reinstatement.
• On-site sorting and segregation facility of all type of wastes is considered as one of the best practice in waste management and hence, should be implemented in all projects generating construction waste.
• The sorted public fill and C&D waste should be properly reused.
• Excavated slope, stockpiled material and bund walls should be covered by tarpaulin until used in order to prevent wind-blown dust during dry weather, and to reduce muddy runoff during wet weather.
7.1 Monitoring Requirement during Construction
Monitoring for Construction Works
· CH4:
>10% Lower Explosion Limit (LEL);
· CO2:
>0.5%; and
· O2:
<18% by volume.
7.2.3 For excavation works deeper than 1m, measurements should be made:
• at ground surface
prior to excavation;
• immediately before
any worker enters the excavation;
• at the beginning
of each working day for the entire period the excavation remains open; and
• periodically
through the working day whilst workers are in the excavation.
7.2.4 For excavation between 300mm and 1m deep, measurements should be made:
• directly after the excavation
has been completed; and
• periodically
whilst the excavation remains open.
7.2.6 The locations of LFG monitoring locations during reporting period
are shown in Table 7-1. The Site formation layout plan is shown
in Figure 2 and the
Layout of LFG monitoring locations is presented in Figure 3.
Table 7-1 Locations of LFG Monitoring during reporting period
Monitoring Period |
Monitoring Location |
Type of
works |
Oct to Dec 2024 |
Portion A +50 mpD to 70 mpD Platform |
Excavation Works |
Dec 2024 |
Portion
B2/E1 |
7.3.1 The LFG monitoring was conducted at Portion A +50 mpD to 70 mpD Platform and Portion B2/E1 during the reporting period (conducted on working days). The LFG monitoring results are summarized in Table 7-2.
Table 7-2 Summary of LFG Monitoring Results
LFG Monitoring Station |
Monitoring Date |
Monitoring Parameter(s) |
|||
CH4 in % |
LEL in %/v |
CO2 in % |
O2 in % |
||
Average Monitoring Results (Range) |
|||||
Portion A +50 mpD to 70 mpD Platform |
Oct 2024 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.1 (20.0 – 20.1) |
Nov 2024 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.1 (20.0 – 20.1) |
|
Dec 2024 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.0 (20.0 – 20.1) |
|
Portion B2/E1 |
Dec 2024 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20.0 (20.0 – 20.1) |
Action Level |
>10% LEL |
--- |
>0.5%** CO2 |
<19% |
|
Limit Level |
>20% LEL |
--- |
>1.5% CO2 |
<18% |
* LEL: Lower Explosive
Limit - concentrations in air below which there is not enough fuel to continue
an explosion.
** This Limit Level of CO2
at 0.5% is set for reference only, assuming no CO2 emission from a
particular location.
7.3.2 No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels of LFG was recorded during the reporting period. The Notification of Environmental Quality Limits Exceedance is presented in Appendix E.
7.3.3 No effect that arose from the other special phenomena and work progress of the concerned site was noted during the current monitoring month.
7.4 Recommended Mitigation Measures
7.4.1 The recommended landfill gas mitigation measures from EIA report are listed as followed:
• Special LFG precautions should be taken due to close proximity of NENT landfill extension site to existing landfill to avoid potential hazards of LFG exposure (ignition, explosion, asphyxiation, toxicity).
• Prominent safety warning signs should be erected on-site to alert all personnel and visitors of LFG hazards during excavation works.
• No smoking or burning should be permitted on-site.
• Prominent 'No smoking' and ‘No Naked Flames’ signs should be erected on-site.
• No worker should be allowed to work alone at any time in excavated trenches or confined areas on-site.
• Adequate fire fighting equipment should be provided on-site.
• Construction equipment should be equipped with vertical exhaust at least 0.6m above ground installed with spark arrestors.
• Electrical motors and extension cords should be explosion-proof and intrinsically safe for use on-site.
• ’Permit to Work' system should be implemented.
• Welding, flame-cutting or other hot works should be conducted only under ‘Permit to Work’ system following clear safety requirements, gas monitoring procedures and presence of qualified persons to supervise the works.
7.5 Event and Action Plan (EAP)
7.5.1 Should non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with the action plan in Table 7-3 shall be carried out.
Table 7-3 Action Plan for the monitoring during construction phase
Parameter |
Monitoring Result |
Action |
Oxygen (O2) |
Action Level <19% O2 |
Ventilate trench/void to restore O2
to >19% |
Limit Level <18% O2 |
Stop works Evacuate personnel/prohibit entry Increase ventilation to restore O2 to
>19% |
|
Methane (CH4) |
Action Level >10% LEL* |
Prohibit hot works Increase ventilation to restore CH4
to <10% LEL |
Limit Level >20% LEL* |
Stop works Evacuate personnel/prohibit entry Increase ventilation to restore CH4 to
<10% LEL |
|
Carbon dioxide (CO2) |
Action Level** >0.5%** CO2 |
Ventilate to restore CO2 to
<0.5% |
Limit Level >1.5% CO2 |
Stop works Evacuate personnel / prohibit entry Increase ventilation to restore CO2 to
<0.5% |
** This Action Level of CO2
at 0.5% is set for reference only, assuming no CO2 emission from a
particular location.
Depending on the baseline
CO2 levels, the Action Level at a particular location will be
changed.
8.1.2 All relevant environmental mitigation measures
listed in the approved EIA Report and the Updated EM&A Manual, and their implementation status
are summarised in Appendix G.
9.1.1 The
Mitigation measures for preservation of the cultural landscape
feature located within the project area was conducted before commencement of
construction of the project based on the requirement of Survey Report and
Mapping Records for Boulder Paths BP1 & 2 & Conditions of G2, G4, G5
G6, G7, G8, G14, G15, G25, G26 and G27 within NENTX.
9.1.2 The
survey and mapping works carried out on 25 April 2022 and the verification works carried out on 23 August
22 confirmed that both 2 boulder paths BP1 and BP2 are fall outside the site boundary and the
Project area.
9.1.3 All the
affected graves within the waste boundary have been removed in accordance with section
119(1) of the Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance (Cap 132). Removal of the graves as
shown on Figure 2 attached to the FEP was proven by the visit of graves on 22 August 2022. All
the graves as shown on Figure 2 attached to the FEP were abandoned and removed
and no mitigation or preservation measures is necessary.
9.1.5 Implementation
of the mitigation measures such as permanent fencing to protect the boulder
path and setting up warning notices during construction phase of the Project
has been monitored through the regular site inspection/audit. The permanent
fencing locations are shown in Appendix
H. In case of any
presence of undiscovered grave during construction phase, AMO will be informed
as soon as possible.
10.1.1
The post-transplantation
monitoring had been
completed in October 2023. No further
post-transplantation monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the requirement of the approved Transplantation Proposal for Plant Species of Conservation
Importance (Rev.1).
10.1.2
The post-translocation monitoring had been
completed in July 2023. No further post-translocation monitoring will be
conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Revised Translocation
Proposal for the Endemic Freshwater Crab Somanniathelphusa
zanklon.
10.1.3
The details of requirements, monitoring results
and site inspection with photos for the post-translocation monitoring and post-transplantation monitoring would be
reported separately.
10.1.4
The milestone of the ecological monitoring is
presented in Table 10-1. The softcopies of the submissions are
provided in https://www.nentx-ema.com/ep-submissions/.
Table 10-1 Milestone of the Ecological Monitoring
Type of Monitoring |
Monitoring Event No. |
Monitoring Date |
Post-transplantation Monitoring |
1st |
24 Nov 2022 |
2nd |
9 Dec 2022 |
|
3rd |
21 Dec 2022 |
|
4th |
13 Jan 2023 |
|
5th |
26 Jan 2023 |
|
6th |
8 Feb 2023 |
|
7th |
24 Feb 2023 |
|
8th |
20 Mar 2023 |
|
9th |
21 Apr 2023 |
|
10th |
12 May 2023 |
|
11th |
16 Jun 2023 |
|
12th |
18 Jul 2023 |
|
13th |
11 Aug 2023 |
|
14th |
15 Sep 2023 |
|
15th |
13 Oct 2023 |
|
Post-translocation
Monitoring |
1st
(Aug 2022) |
29 Aug 2022 |
2nd
(Sep 2022) |
28 Sep 2022 |
|
3rd
(Oct 2022) |
28 Oct 2022 |
|
4th
(Nov 2022) |
22 Nov 2022 |
|
5th
(Dec 2022) |
29 Dec 2022 |
|
6th
(Jan 2023) |
30 Jan 2023 |
|
7th
(Feb 2023) |
24 Feb 2023 |
|
8th
(Mar 2023) |
20 Mar 2023 |
|
9th
(Apr 2023) |
19 Apr 2023 |
|
10th
(May 2023) |
17 May 2023 |
|
11th
(Jun 2023) |
7 Jun 2023 |
|
12th
(Jul 2023) |
12 Jul 2023 |
11 Site Inspection and Audit
11.1.1
Site Inspection and audits were carried out by
ET on weekly basis to monitor the implementation of proper environmental
management practices and mitigation measures in the Project Site.
11.1.2
Total 13 weekly environmental
site inspections were conducted during the reporting period. 3 of them were the
joint environmental site inspections with the representatives of ER, Contractor,
IEC and ET. There was no noncompliance recorded during the site inspections.
11.1.3
Details of observations and recommendations are
summarized in Table 11-1.
Table 11-1 Observations and Recommendations of Site
Audit
Parameter |
Date |
Observation and Reminders |
Follow-up Action Taken |
Air Quality |
7 Oct 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was
reminded that the exposed slope surface at Portion B2-1 should not only be
covered with a green net, but also with tarpaulin sheets for short-term and
shotcrete for long-term slope protection, to prevent silty stormwater runoff. |
|
7 Oct 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the exposed
slope should be covered by green net after earthwork at Portion A. |
|
|
7 Oct 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that any breaks
in the slope protection should be maintained and shotcrete for long-term
slope protection at SBA. |
|
|
14 Oct 2024 |
|||
21 Oct 2024 |
|||
28 Oct 2024 |
|||
4 Nov
2024 |
|||
11 Nov 2024 |
|||
14 Oct 2024 |
Observation: Unpaved main haul road is dusty and
fugitive dust is observed at Portion A. |
The Contractor was advised that watering should
be provided regularly to ensure the unpaved main haul road is kept damp to
prevent dust dispersion at Portion A. |
|
4 Nov 2024 |
|||
14 Oct 2024 |
Observation: Activities of handing or storage of bulk cement
or dry PFA shall be carried out in a totally enclosed system or facility at
Portion E3-1. |
The Contractor was recommended that the
shelter-on top and the 3-sides should be provided for the activities of handing and storage of bulk cement or dry PFA at Portion
E3-1. |
|
14 Oct 2024 |
Observation: The exposed slope at Portion B2-1 was observed to
be not entirely covered by impervious sheeting. |
The Contractor was reminded that any breaks in
the slope protection should be maintained and shotcrete for long-term slope
protection at SBA. |
|
Air Quality |
14 Oct 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the
exposed slope should be covered with green netting and that the dusty
material should be disposed of as soon as possible after the earthwork at
Portion A. |
|
21 Oct 2024 |
|||
28 Oct 2024 |
|||
21 Oct 2024 |
Observation: The generator without NRMM label was
observed at Portion D. |
The contractor was reminded that NRMM
label should be affixed on the generator at Portion D. |
|
28 Oct 2024 |
Observation: More than 20 bags of
PFA material should be stored in the top and 3-sides of the shelter or
covered with impervious sheeting at Portion A. |
The Contractor was reminded that more than
20 bags of PFA material should be stored in a top and three-sided shelter or
covered with an impervious sheet at Portion A. |
|
28 Oct 2024 |
Observation: Open stockpiling of construction
material should be covered with tarpaulin and removed as soon as possible at
Portion E4. |
The Contractor was advised that open
stockpiling of construction material should be removed and kept away from the
sedimentation basin at Portion E4. |
|
4 Nov 2024 |
Observation: The exposed slope without impervious sheet was
observed after the earthwork at Portion A. |
The Contractor was advised that the exposed slope
after earthwork should be covered with impervious sheeting or green netting
to minimize the visual impact at Portion A. |
|
4 Nov 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the exposed
slope should be covered with impervious sheeting and shotcrete for long-term
slope protection at Portion E4. |
|
|
11 Nov
2024 |
|||
18 Nov 2024 |
|||
25 Nov
2024 |
|||
4 Nov 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the dust control
measures (including frequency of watering by water trucks and water sprinkler
etc.) should be increased when the exposed area was dry and the operation of
water sprinkler should be maintained in good conditions to ensure the high
effectiveness of dust control in the project site. |
|
|
11 Nov
2024 |
|||
25 Nov 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that NRMM label
should be provided and affixed to the new generator before it is operated at
SBA. |
|
|
Air Quality |
2 Dec 2024 |
Observation: The unpaved haul road was dry and fugitive
dust was observed at Portion A, E3-1A and E4. |
The Contractor was reminded that the dust
control measures (including frequency of watering by water trucks and water
sprinkler etc.) should be increased when the exposed area was dry and the
operation of water sprinkler should be maintained in good conditions to
ensure the high effectiveness of dust control at Portion A, E3-1A and E4. |
2
Dec 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the exposed
slope should be covered with impervious sheeting after earthworks completed
at Portion A. |
|
|
16 Dec 2024 |
Observation: The unpaved access road should be sprayed
with water when the access road was dry. And the speed limit sign should be
displayed at the access road of Portion B2/E1. |
The Contractor was advised that the unpaved
access road should be sprayed with water when the access road was dry. And
the speed limit sign should be displayed at the access road of Portion B2/E1
to minimize the flying dust carried by the transportation of the relevant
access road. |
|
16
Dec 2024 |
Observation: The worksites were dry and the breaking works
without dust control measures at Portion E4 were found. |
The Contractor was recommended that the worksites
should be wetted with water regularly and the breaking work area at Portion
E4 when the work is conducting to reduce the risk of causing flying dust. |
|
23 Dec 2024 |
Observation: The paved and unpaved access roads were
dry, and fugitive dust was observed at Portion A B2-E1 and SBA. |
The Contractor was advised that dust
control measures should be implemented, such as providing water spray and
increasing the frequency of water trucks, to ensure that both paved and
unpaved access roads are wetted and to prevent dust dispersion at Portions A,
B2-E1, and SBA. |
|
30
Dec 2024 |
Observation: The unpaved access road should be wetted by
watering when the road was dry. |
The Contractor was advised that water spraying
and water trucks should be arranged and provided frequently to ensure the
unpaved access road was wetted and to prevent dust dispersion at Portions
B2-E1 and SBA. |
|
30 Dec 2024 |
Observation: More than 20 bags of cement or dry PFA
without cover was observed at Portion B2-E1. |
The Contractor was recommended that more
than 20 bags of cement or dry PFA should be covered entirely by impervious
sheeting or placed in an area sheltered on the top and 3 sides at Portion
B2-E1. |
|
Air
Quality |
30
Dec 2024 |
Observation: The accumulation of demolished trees was found at
Portion B2-E1. |
The Contractor was reminded that demolished trees
should be completely covered with impervious sheeting or placed in an area
sheltered on the top and three sides within a day of demolition sides at
Portion B2-E1. |
Noise |
No specific observation was identified in the
reporting period. |
||
Water
Quality |
7 Oct 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the excavation
materials near the u-channel should be removed and kept away from the
u-channel, and that sandbag barriers should be provided near the u-channel to
minimize the excavation materials from entering the drainage system at
Portion B2-1 directly when a rainstorm occurs. |
|
14 Oct 2024 |
|||
21 Oct 2024 |
|||
28 Oct 2024 |
|||
4 Nov 2024 |
|||
7 Oct 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the
deposited silt and grit under the sedimentation basins at Portions B2-1 and
E3-1 should be removed regularly in order to maintain the effectiveness of
these sedimentation basins. |
|
|
21
Oct 2024 |
Observation: The accumulated of wastewater with
general waste in the skip was found at Portion A. |
The contractor was advised that the
general waste and the accumulation of wastewater should be removed, and that
the accumulation of wastewater should be treated by a silt removal facility
at Portion A. |
|
28 Oct 2024 |
Observation: Silt fence should be
properly maintained at SBA. |
The Contractor was recommended to arrange
silt fence maintenance regularly to ensure silt fence efficiency at SBA. |
|
11 Nov 2024 |
Observation: Excavation material near the u-channel
is observed at Portion B2-1. |
The Contractor was reminded that the excavation materials
near the u-channel should be removed and kept away from the u-channel at
Portion B2-1. |
|
18 Nov 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the
function of silt removal facilities and drainage system should be maintained
properly before rainstorm. |
|
|
Water Quality |
25
Nov 2024 |
Reminder: The deposited of silt and grit should
be cleaned and disposed regularly at Portion E3-1. |
The Contractor was advised to arrange
regular desilting to ensure the proper efficiency of drainage system at Portion
E3-1. |
2 Dec 2024 |
Observation: The deposited of silt with muddy water was
observed in wheel washing bay at Portion A. |
The Contractor was advised that the deposits of
silt in the wheel washing bay should be cleaned regularly to ensure that each
vehicle is washed immediately to remove any dust and debris from its body and
wheels before leaving the construction site. |
|
9 Dec 2024 |
Observation: The fallen trees were collapsed into
the drainage channel. |
The Contractor was advised that the trees should
be removed to ensure that the drainage channel is properly maintained and
remains efficient. |
|
9 Dec 2024 |
Reminder: The Contractor was reminded that the
exposed slope should be covered with impervious sheeting after earthworks
completed at Portion A. |
|
|
Waste
and Chemical Management |
7 Oct 2024 |
Observation: Chemical container mixed with C&D waste in
waste skip at SBA. |
The
Contractor was reminded to provide chemical drip tray for chemical storage to
prevent chemical spillage and land contamination at SBA. |
11 Nov 2024 |
Observation: General waste was observed on the floor at
Portion D. |
The Contractor was recommended that enclosed bin
should be provided for general collection and waste segregation to avoid
waste accumulated on the floor at Portion D. |
|
11 Nov 2024 |
Observation: Chemical containers without drip tray and
chemical label were found at Potion D. |
The Contractor was advised that chemical
containers should be placed in the drip tray and labelled chemical label at
Portion D. |
|
18 Nov 2024 |
|||
18 Nov 2024 |
Observation: The accumulated of C&D waste was observed on
the floor at Portion A. |
The contractor was reminded that the C&D
waste should be collected in waste skip properly at Portion A. |
|
16 Dec 2024 |
Observation: Accumulation of waste was found at Portion
D. |
The Contractor was advised that the accumulation
of waste should be removed regularly to minimize the nuisance from windblown
and dust. |
|
Waste
and Chemical Management |
23 Dec 2024 |
Observation: The accumulation of general waste was observed on
the floor at Portion A, and the general waste was found stored in waste skips
and rubbish bins without covers at SBA. |
The Contractor was reminded that the frequency of
general waste disposal should be increased to prevent waste accumulation at
Portion A, and that enough enclosed bins should be provided to ensure proper
general waste collection at SBA. |
30 Dec 2024 |
Observation: General wastes were found in waste skip and
rubbish bins without covers was observed at SBA. |
The Contractor was reminded that enough enclosed
bins should be provided to ensure proper general waste collection at SBA. |
|
Landscape
and Visual Impact |
No specific observation was identified in the
reporting period. |
||
Permit / Licenses |
No specific observation was identified in the
reporting period. |
11.1.4 No general site inspections were
conducted by Environmental Protection Department-Regional
Office (North) (EPD-RNG) during the reporting period.
12 Environmental Non-conformance
12.1 Summary of Monitoring Exceedance
12.1.1
No Action / Limit Level exceedance impact
monitoring was recorded at designated monitoring stations during the reporting period. The
Summary of Impact 1-hr & 24-hr TSP Exceedance are shown in Table 12-1.
Dust
Monitoring Station |
AM1 |
AM2 |
AM3 |
||||
Level
Exceedance Parameters |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
|
1-hr TSP |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
24-hr TSP |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal
to non-project related
Noise Monitoring
12.1.2
No exceedance of the Action and Limit Levels
was recorded at designated monitoring stations during the reporting period. The
Summary of Impact Noise Exceedance are shown in Table
12-2.
Noise
Monitoring Station |
NM1(a) |
NM2(a) |
|||
Level
Exceedance Parameters |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
|
LAeq(30mins) |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal to non-project related
Surface Water Quality Monitoring
12.1.3
No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels of
surface was recorded at designated monitoring stations during the reporting
period. The Summary of Impact Surface Water Quality Exceedance are shown in Table
12-3.
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Station |
WM1 |
WM2 |
|||
Level Exceedance Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
pH |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
DO |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Turbidity |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
SS |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal to non-project related
Landfill Gas Monitoring
12.1.4 No exceedance of the Action and Limit Levels for were recorded at designated monitoring stations during the reporting period. The Summary of Landfill Gas Exceedance are shown in Table 12-4.
Landfill Gas Monitoring Station |
Portion A +50 mpD to 70 mpD Platform |
||
Level Exceedance Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
CH4 |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
|
CO2 |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
|
O2 |
Exceedance Date |
- |
- |
Exceedance
Count |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal to non-project related
12.2 Summary of Environmental Non-compliance
12.2.1 No non- compliance event was recorded during the
reporting period.
12.3 Summary of Environmental Complaint
12.3.1 One
environmental complaint regarding the water quality was received on 28 November
2024. The relevant investigation is conducting by the related parties. The
investigation results will be presented when the investigation has been
completed. The
cumulative statistics on environmental complaints are presented in Table 12-5.
Table 12-5
Cumulative Statistics on Environmental Complaints
Reporting Period |
Environmental Aspects |
|||||
Air
Quality |
Noise
|
Water
Quality |
Waste |
Ecology |
||
Oct 2024 |
Complaint Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
No. of Complaint |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Nov 2024 |
Complaint Date |
- |
- |
28 Nov 2024 |
- |
- |
No. of Complaint |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Dec 2024 |
Complaint Date |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
No. of Complaint |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total during the reporting period |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Accumulate of project |
1 |
0 |
7(1* & 1#) |
0 |
0 |
Remarks: * equal to
non-project related after the investigation.
12.3.2 Cumulative complaint / enquiry log, Summaries of
complaints and enquiries & Environmental complaint reports are presented in
Appendix
I.
12.4 Summary of Environmental Summons and Successful Prosecution
12.4.1 No summons and prosecution were received during
the reporting period.
13 Implementation Status on Environmental Mitigation Measures
13.1.1
The Contractor has
generally implemented part of environmental mitigation measures and
requirements as stated in the EIA Report, the EP and Updated EM&A Manual and the contract documents. The
implemented mitigation measures are considered effective. The implementation
status during the reporting period is summarized in Appendix G.
14.1.1 1-hr & 24-hr TSP impact monitoring was carried
out in the reporting period. No Action / Limit
Level exceedance for 1-hr & 24-hr TSP impact monitoring at AM1, AM2 &
AM3 was recorded during the reporting period.
14.1.2 Construction noise monitoring was carried out in
the reporting period. No Action / Limit Level exceedance for construction noise
monitoring at NM1a & NM2a was recorded during the reporting period.
14.1.4 Surface water monitoring was carried out in the
reporting period. No Action / Limit Level exceedance for surface
water monitoring at WM1 & WM2 was recorded during the reporting period.
14.1.5 Landfill Gas Monitoring was carried out in the
reporting period. No exceedance of Action and Limit Levels of LFG was recorded
during the reporting period.
14.1.6 In terms of cultural heritage, implementation of
the mitigation measures such as permanent fencing to protect the boulder path and
setting up warning notices during construction phase of the Project has been
monitored through the regular site inspection/audit in the reporting period. All
the mitigation measures are in order.
14.1.7 no post-transplantation
monitoring, and no post-translocation monitoring was conducted during the
reporting period.
14.1.8 13 environmental site inspections were carried out
in the reporting period. Recommendations on mitigation measures for Permit/
Licenses were given to the Contractor for remediating the deficiencies
identified during the site inspections.
14.1.9 One
environmental complaint regarding the water quality was received on 28 November
2024. The relevant investigation is conducting by the related parties. The
investigation results will be presented when the investigation has been
completed.
14.1.10 No non-compliance event was recorded during the
reporting period.
14.1.11 No notification of summons and prosecution was
received during the reporting period.
Comment and Recommendations
14.1.12 The recommended environmental mitigation measures,
as proposed in the EIA reports and Updated EM&A Manuals
shall be effectively implemented to minimize the potential environmental
impacts from the Project. The EM&A programme would effectively monitor the
environmental impacts generated from the construction activities and ensure the
proper implementation of mitigation measures.
14.1.13
According to the environmental audit performed
in the reporting period, the following recommendations were made:
Air Quality Impact
•
The Contractor was reminded that stockpiling of
dusty material should be covered properly by impervious sheet to prevent dust
dispersion.
•
The Contractor was reminded that the unpaved assess
road should be wetted by water spraying to prevent dust dispersion.
•
The Contractor was reminded that NRMM label should
be affixed on the generator.
•
The Contractor was reminded that the dust control
measures (including frequency of watering by water trucks and water sprinkler
etc.) should be increased when the exposed area was dry and the operation of
water sprinkler should be maintained in good conditions to ensure the high
effectiveness of dust control in the project site.
Construction Noise Impact
•
No specific
observation was identified in the reporting period.
Water Quality Impact
•
The Contractor was
advised to provide channel, earth bunds, or sandbag barriers to properly direct
stormwater to silt removal facility and clean up the deposited silt and grit
regularly.
•
The Contractor was
reminded that the slope protection should be scheduled and maintained.
•
The Contractor was
reminded that the precaution shall be taken with Appendix A2 of ProPECC PN 1/94 before, during and after rainstorm.
•
The Contractor was
reminded that the exposed slope surface should not only be covered with a green
net, but also with tarpaulin sheets for short-term and shotcrete for long-term
slope protection, to prevent silty stormwater runoff.
•
The Contractor was
reminded that the excavation materials near the u-channel should be removed and
kept away from the u-channel, and that sandbag barriers should be provided near
the u-channel to minimize the excavation materials from entering the drainage
system directly when a rainstorm occurs.
•
The Contractor was
reminded that the deposited silt and grit under the sedimentation basins should
be removed regularly in order to maintain the effectiveness of these
sedimentation basins.
•
The Contractor was
reminded that accumulated water should be removed and directed to silt removal
facilities for treatment.
•
The Contractor was
advised to conduct silt fence maintenance regularly to ensure the silt fence
around the soil stockpile areas prevents sediment from entering the system.
•
The Contractor was
recommended to change the angle of placing the shovel bucket and provide the
cover such as impervious sheet for waste skip to minimize the potential risk
for accumulation of water. The accumulated water should be removed to silt
removal facilities for treatment.
Waste and Chemical Management
•
The Contractor was reminded to provide chemical
drip tray for chemical storage to prevent chemical spillage and land
contamination.
•
The Contractor was reminded that the general waste
and C&D waste should be segregated by enclosed bin and C&D waste skip
to ensure general waste and C&D waste are stored separately and properly.
Landscape and Visual Impact
•
No specific observation was identified in the
reporting period.
Permit / Licenses
•
No specific observation was identified in the
reporting period.
14.1.14
The Contractor has generally implemented
environmental mitigation measures and requirements as stated in the EIA Report,
the EP and Updated EM&A Manual and the contract documents. The
implemented mitigation measures are considered effective.
14.1.15
The ET will keep track on the EM&A
programme to ensure compliance of environmental requirements and the proper
implementation of all necessary mitigation measures.