2nd Post-Translocation Monitoring Report (September 2022)

Northeast New Territories Landfill Extension (NENTX) | Contract No. EP/SP/77/15

0092/22/ED/0199 04 | 19 December 2022

Formal Submission

Veolia Environmental Services Hong Kong Ltd.

 

 

ET certification letter

IEC verification letter

 

 

                                                      

                                                                                              

                                                                                                            


                                                                                                                                          

Document Control

Document Information

Project Title

Northeast New Territories Landfill Extension (NENTX) | Contract No. EP/SP/77/15

Document Title

2nd Post-Translocation Monitoring Report (September 2022)

Fugro Project No.

0092-22

Fugro Document No.

0092/22/ED/0199

Issue Number

04

Issue Status

Formal Submission           

Fugro Legal Entity

Fugro Technical Services Limited

Issuing Office Address

13/F, Fugro House – KCC2, 1 Kwai On Rd, Kwai Chung, NT, Hong Kong

Client Information

Client

Veolia Environmental Services Hong Kong Ltd.

Client Address

40/F, One Taikoo Place, Taikoo Place, 979 King’s Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong

Client Contact

Mr. William Wan

Client Document No.

NENTX-FUG-RP-E-EM-005-I01

Document History

Issue

Date

Status

Comments on Content

Prepared By

Checked By

Approved By

01

07 Oct 2022

Draft

Awaiting client’s comments

KJB

FN

CY

02

11 Oct 2022

Formal Submission

For ET’s certification and IEC’s verification

KJB

FN

CY

03

20 Oct 2022

Formal Submission

For ET’s certification and IEC’s verification

KJB

FN

CY

04

19 Dec 2022

Formal Submission

For ET’s certification and IEC’s verification

KJB

FN

CY

Project Team

Initials

Name

Role

CY

Colin Yung

Project Manager

FN

Fenelyn Nabuab

Ecologist

KJB

Kalvin Jay Boregon

Ecologist

JPT

Jhomar Tillo

Ecologist

RL

Ray Li

Environmental Consultant

SMR

Sheila Marie Rabi

GIS Specialist/ Ecologist

AY

Andy Yuen

Assistant Environmental Consultant

 

 


Contents

1.        Introduction  1

1.2      Purpose of this Document 1

1.3      Structure of the Report 1

2.       Mark-Recapture Methodology  2

2.2      The Monitoring Area  2

2.3      Personnel 3

2.4      Mark-Recapture Activity  3

2.4.2      Hand Netting  3

2.4.3      Kick-netting  4

2.4.4      Marking  4

3.       Survey Results  5

4.       Post-translocation Monitoring Schedule  5

5.       Summary and Conclusion  6

6.       References  6

Appendices

Appendix A Monitoring Area  7

Appendix B Obtained Permit under Cap. 170  0

Appendix C Fieldwork Datasheet 4

 

List of Plates in the Main Text

Photo 2.1: Section of the monitoring area with low gradient and low water flow   2

Photo 2.2: Hand netting at a potential habitat (vegetation) along the watercourse  3

Photo 2.3: Surveyor kick-netting the substrate and checking the net’s contents  4

Photo 2.4: Surveyor searching for S. zanklon on potential hiding space (under rocks) along the watercourse  4

Photo 3.1: Dense growth of riparian vegetation in the monitoring area  5

 

 


1.                      Introduction

1.1.1               The North East New Territories Landfill Extension (the NENTX Project) is a designated project.  The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report was approved with conditions on 20 September 2007 (AEIAR-111/2007) and the Environmental Permit (EP) EP-292/2007 (the “EP) was issued on 26 November 2007. Additionally, a Further Environmental Permit FEP-01/292/2007 (the “FEP”) was also issued under the EIA Ordinance on 28 April 2022.

1.1.2               In order to fulfil FEP conditions 2.6 and 2.8 on the post-translocation monitoring of the endemic freshwater crab Somanniathelphusa zanklon, a survey shall be carried out to monitor the establishment and effectiveness of the measures for the endemic S. zanklon community in the translocated site.

1.1.3               The post-translocation monitoring methodology shall be in accordance with the approved Revised Translocation Proposal for the Endemic Freshwater Crab Somanniathelphusa zanklon (NENTX-FUG-RP-E-EM-I01 Revised Translocation Proposal) (the “approved Proposal”). The approved Proposal was agreed upon with the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) and Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD).  

1.1.4               The NENTX Design-Build-Operate (DBO) Contractor, on behalf of EPD/LDG, is responsible for carrying out the post-translocation monitoring works in accordance with the approved Proposal. 

1.1.5               The NENTX DBO contract was awarded to Veolia Environmental Services Hong Kong Ltd. (Veolia) and Fugro Technical Services Limited (Fugro) was appointed by Veolia to implement the post-translocation monitoring works in accordance with the approved Proposal.  

1.2                   Purpose of this Document

1.2.1               This Post-Translocation Monitoring Report for the Endemic Freshwater Crab Somanniathelphusa zanklon (the “Report”) was prepared to detail the findings of the mark-recapture post-translocation activities in fulfilment of Section 4 of the approved Proposal, FEP conditions 2.6 and 2.8, and Conditions of EIAR Approval No. 4 for the NENTX Project.

1.3                    Structure of the Report

1.3.1               Succeeding this Section 1 Introduction, the remainder of this Report is presented as follows:

§  Section 2 details the methodology of the mark-recapture activity;

§  Section 3 presents the survey results of mark-recapture activity;

§  Section 4 details the post-translocation monitoring schedule; and

§  Section 5 presents the summary and conclusion.

2.                    Mark-Recapture Methodology

2.1.1               This section presents the methodology and approach of the post-translocation mark-recapture monitoring in accordance with Section 4 of the approved Proposal; and in fulfilment of FEP conditions 2.6 and 2.8 and Conditions of EIAR Approval No. 4 for the NENTX Project. 

2.2                  The Monitoring Area

2.2.1               The Recipient Site (the “Monitoring Area”) (Appendix A) is the site where the eight individuals of S. zanklon were translocated during capture-translocation surveys conducted from 21 to 24 July 2022.

2.2.2               The Monitoring Area is located at the middle section of Ping Yuen River tributary, and adjacent to Ping Yuen Road, to the north of Ping Yeung Village. In this tributary, S. zanklon was previously recorded during the approved EIA studies (i.e. EIA-133/2007 and EIA-190/2010) (ERM, 2022) suggesting that this watercourse is suitable for S. zanklon.

2.2.3               Although channelisation features (e.g. concrete bank and gabions) and an inflatable water dam are present about 100m to the east, the monitoring area is still considered largely natural with a low gradient and low water flow (see Photo 2.1). The streambed is mainly covered by soil and stream banks are vegetated with grass. This area meets the habitat requirements of the species. The soft soil stream substrate and the availability of riparian vegetation are ideal for S. zanklon to create microhabitat to inhabit. In addition, the natural meander would also reduce the water flow, which is preferred by the S. zanklon. It is anticipated that pollution or disturbance would be in a low level in this section, considering there is limited roads and houses (and therefore limited human activities) until the stream reaches Kan Tau Wai and Tong Fong along Ping Che Road.

Photo 2.1: Section of the monitoring area with low gradient and low water flow

 

 

2.3                  Personnel

2.3.1               The post-translocation monitoring survey team was led by a qualified ecologist with minimum of five years of experience in aquatic ecology or other related experience as accepted by AFCD and EPD. In particular, the survey team leader have the experience in surveys of S. zanklon.

2.4                  Mark-Recapture Activity

2.4.1.1          The second mark-recapture activity was conducted last 28 September 2022 during night-time period. Hand netting and kick sampling in the monitoring area were conducted. In addition, direct observation was also conducted along the stream riparian zone to search for S. zanklon in their potential hiding spaces (e.g. under rocks and fallen tree branches). Permit under Cap. 170 was obtained from AFCD before the use of nets to collect freshwater fauna in the streams (Appendix B).

2.4.2               Hand Netting

2.4.2.1          Hand netting (see Photo 2.2) was used to search the potential habitats along the watercourse. The sweeping motion of the hand netting scraped the layer of the stream bottom substrate into the net, e.g., soil and leaf litter where possible, as S. zanklon is likely to be among these substrates. After taking the hand net out of the water, it was allowed to drain, and the net content was emptied on to a large sorting tray. All caught S. zanklon, if any, would be carefully moved to a plastic container for marking.

 

 

Photo 2.2: Hand netting at a potential habitat (vegetation) along the watercourse

2.4.3               Kick-netting

2.4.3.1          Kick-netting (see Photo 2.3) was done along the watercourse by moving upstream with the net facing the water current. The surveyor disturbed the substrate by kicking the streambed substrate by kicking, such that the S. zanklon dislodged from the streambed would be trapped in the net.  In order to maximise the survey effort within the stream, the surveyor moved up the stream in a zigzag direction to increase the kick sampling coverage. The net was checked after a maximum of one minute of kick sampling. Additionally, the net was checked more frequently if large amount of substrate was kicked into the net.

 

Photo 2.3: Surveyor kick-netting the substrate and checking the net’s contents

2.4.3.2          Similar to hand netting, the net content was emptied on to a large sorting tray. All caught S. zanklon, if any, were carefully moved to a plastic container for post-translocation marking.

2.4.4              Direct Observation

Direct observation (see Photo 2.4) to search for S. zanklon in their potential hiding spaces was also conducted.

Photo 2.4: Surveyor searching for S. zanklon on potential hiding space (under rocks) along the watercourse

2.4.5               Marking

All captured S. zanklon individuals would be marked prior to releasing them back to the monitoring area. The marker would be an epoxy-resin based paint (Jotamastic Wintergrade) which contains a metallic component and cures in contact with water. Earlier laboratory and field trials had established that crab survival and behaviour was unaffected by paint marking on the carapace and that the marks persisted in field conditions (Eaton et. al., 2001). Recaptures, if any, would be re-marked with black numerals to indicate the month of capture.

              3.     Survey Results

3.1                    There was no S. zanklon individual that was recaptured nor marked during the monitoring period (Appendix C). This could be due to the current dense growth of the riparian vegetation of the monitoring area (see Photo 3.1), which could have provided refuge and protection for the crabs, making them difficult to capture during the monitoring activity.

Photo 3.1: Dense growth of riparian vegetation in the monitoring area

               4.     Post-translocation Monitoring Schedule

4.1                    Continued post-translocation monitoring will be conducted to further monitor the establishment and effectiveness of the measures for S. zanklon community in the translocated site.  Succeeding post-translocation monitoring will be carried out once a month (at night-time) for the upcoming third month, and then will be done quarterly after the third month for one year. This is to ensure that only minimal disturbance will be created to the newly establishing translocated S. zanklon community in the recipient site.

 

 

                5.     Summary and Conclusion

5.1                    No S. zanklon individual was recaptured nor marked during the monitoring period. The result could be due to the current dense growth of riparian vegetation in the monitoring area which could have consequently provided refuge and protection for the crabs, making them difficult to capture. However, the Monitoring Area will be continuously monitored in accordance with the approved Proposal.

6.                    References

Eaton, D.R., J.T. Addison, S.P. Milligan, J. Brown and L.J. Fernand. 2001. Larvae surveys of edible crab (Cancer pagurus) off the east coast of England: implications for stock structure and management. ICES CM 2001/J:14. 10pp.

ERM. 2022. Aquatic Fauna Survey Findings included in previous Translocation Proposal (version 4.0).

Hong Kong Observatory (HKO). 2022. https://www.hko.gov.hk/en/wxinfo/climat/warndb/warndb1.shtml?opt=1&sgnl=1.or.higher&start_ym=202208&end_ym=202208&submit=Submit+Query [This is the bookmark for the end of the main section. Do not put content past this point]