North East New Territories (NENT) Landfill
Extension Updated Environmental Monitoring & Audit Manual 18 January 2024 |
Contents
1.2 Purpose and Scope of this Manual
1.3 Description of the Project
2.1 Objective of EM&A Programme
2.2 Organisation for EM&A Programme
2.3 Structure of the EM&A Manual
2.4 Environmental Management Plan
2.8 Compliance with Actions and Limit Levels
2.12 Cessation of EM&A Programme
3.3 Precautionary Measures During Operational, Restoration and
Aftercare Phases
4.9 Environmental Mitigation Measures
5.2 Precautionary / Mitigation Measures during Construction and
Operation Phases
6.2 Waste Control and Mitigation Measurement
8 Landscape and Visual
Monitoring.
9 Cultural Heritage Monitoring
9.3 Ngong Tong (North and West of Sheh Tsai Ha Road: Western &
Central Section)
9.4 Tong To Shan (North Shek Tsai Ha Road: East Section)
9.5 The Relevant Requirements for Survey and Preservation
10.2 Ecological Mitigation Measures
10.3 Monitoring and Audit for Ecology
10.4 Post - Transplantation Maintenance
10.5 Post - Transplantation Monitoring and Reporting
10.6 Post - Translocation Monitoring and Reporting
11.2 Compliance with Environmental Requirements
12.2 Baseline Monitoring Report
12.5 Interim Notification of Environmental Exceedance
Appendices
Tentative Outline Programme |
|
Project Organization |
|
Environmental
Mitigation Implementation Schedule |
|
A Sample List of VOC
Monitoring Parameters |
|
Sample of Monitoring Data
Record Sheet |
Figures
Location Plan of the Project Site |
|
Landfill Extension Layout |
|
Air, Odour & VOC Monitoring Location |
|
Noise Monitoring Location |
|
Landfill Extension Monitoring Plan |
|
Water Quality Monitoring Location |
|
Archaeological Findings |
|
Recorded Plant Species of Conservation Importance with NENTX under the
Current Study |
The North East New Territories Landfill
Extension (the NENTX Project) is located adjacent to the existing North East
New Territories (NENT) Landfill at Ta Kwu Ling. The
extension site is located in a valley covering mainly the existing NENT
Landfill Stockpile and Borrow Area that was formed to the east of the existing
landfill as part of the original site development of the landfill, and layout
plan shown in Figure 1.1.
The NENTX is a designated project. The Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) Report (AEIAR-111/2007) and an Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual
were approved on 20 September 2007. The project is governed by an Environmental
Permit (EP) (EP-292/2007) which was granted on 26 November 2007. A further of
EP (FEP) was applied and the FEP (FEP-01/292/2007) was subsequently granted on 28
April 2022.
As per requirement of EP Condition 2.5 and FEP Condition 2.3, the
Permit Holder shall, no later than one month before the commencement of
construction of the Project, submit to the Director of Environmental Protection
for approval an updated EM&A Manual for the Project, which shall include the
latest information on the EM&A requirements for ecological, landscape, water and landfill gas hazard. All measures recommended in
the approved EM&A Manual shall be fully and properly implemented according
to the requirements and time schedules set out in the EM&A Manual. The
submissions shall be certified by the Environmental Team (ET) Leader and
verified by the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC).
This updated EM&A Manual has been prepared with reference to the
approved EM&A Manual prepared in March 2007, the current EP, the latest design and EIAO-TM. The purpose of the Manual is to provide
information, guidance and instruction to personnel charged with environmental
duties and those responsible for undertaking EM&A work during construction,
operation, restoration and aftercare phases of the
NENTX. It provides systematic procedures for the environmental monitoring and
auditing of the potential environmental impacts that may arise from the Project.
The monitoring details of the establishment of the endemic freshwater crab, Somanniathelphusa zanklon
community in the translocation site has been included in Section 10.6 of this
EM&A Manual for fulfilling EIA Report Approval Condition No. 4 (Register
No.: AEIAR-111/2017) on 20 September 2007.
Environmental Monitoring and
Audit (EM&A) is an important aspect in the EIA process which specifies the
timeframe and responsibilities for the implementation of environmental
mitigation measures. The requirements on environmental monitoring (including
baseline and impact monitoring) are given in the updated EM&A Manual (the
Manual) which is a supplementary document to the EIA Study for the Project and
prepared in accordance with the requirements in the EIA Study Brief and
Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process (TM-EIAO).
The purpose of this updated EM&A Manual is to guide the establishment of an EM&A programme to ensure compliance with the EIA recommendations, to assess
the effectiveness of recommended mitigation measures, and
to identify further need for
additional mitigation measures or remedial
action.
This updated Manual outlines the monitoring and
audit requirements for the construction, operation, restoration
and aftercare stages of the NENT Landfill
Extension. It aims
to provide systematic procedures for monitoring,
auditing and minimising
environmental impacts associated with construction works and operational activities.
Hong Kong environmental regulations and the
Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines have served
as environmental standards
and guidelines in the preparation of this updated Manual. This updated EM&A
Manual was prepared in accordance with the requirements as stipulated in Annex
21 of the TM-EIAO.
This
updated Manual contains the following information:
Organisation,
hierarchy and responsibilities of the Contractor, Environmental Team (ET),
Independent Environmental Checker (IEC), and Independent Consultant (IC), with
respect to the EM&A requirements during the construction, operation,
restoration and aftercare phases of landfill extension;
Information
on project organisation and programming of construction activities;
Requirements
with respect to the construction schedule and necessary EM&A programme to
track the varying environmental impacts;
Full
details of methodologies to be adopted, including all field, laboratory and
analytical procedures, and details on quality assurance;
Procedure
for undertaking on-site environmental audits;
Definition
of Action and Limit Levels;
Establishment
of Event and Action Plans;
Requirements
of reviewing pollution sources and working procedures required in the event of
non-compliance of environmental criteria and complaints;
Requirements
for reviewing the EIA predictions, implementation of mitigation measures, and
effectiveness of environmental protection and pollution control measures
adopted; and
Presentation
of requirements for EM&A data and appropriate reporting procedures.
1.3.1
General Description of
the Project
The development of the NENT Landfill Extension will involve the
following works:
Site formation, drainage
diversion and preparation;
Installation of liner system;
Installation of leachate
collection, treatment and disposal facilities;
Installation of landfill gas
collection, utilization and management facilities;
Operation and environmental
monitoring of landfill; and
Restoration and aftercare.
1.3.2
Key Project Requirement
The key project requirements for the NENT Landfill Extension are:
Development of sanitary
landfill that covers an area of about 70ha with an estimated void space of 19Mm3;
Provision of liner system for
the landfill to prevent contamination of land and water resources;
Provision of leachate
collection, treatment and disposal facilities with sufficient capacity for
handling the leachate arising from the new landfill;
Provision of IandfiII gas (LFG) collection, utilisation and management facilities;
Provision of utilities,
drainage and road network necessary for the proper operation of the Project;
Provision of facilities (both
civil works and electrical and mechanical equipment) for waste reception,
inspection, charging, handling and compaction, and plant maintenance;
Provision of facilities for
site administration;
Operation of landfill in
compliance with all relevant engineering, geotechnical and environmental standards;
Restoration of landfill in
compliance with all relevant engineering, geotechnical and environmental standards;
Provision of aftercare for the
landfill for a period of about 30 years;
Carrying out environmental monitoring
and audits throughout construction, operation, restoration
and aftercare of the landfill; and
Implementation of environmental
measures necessary for the protection of the surrounding environment.
1.3.3
Size, Scale, Shape and
Design of the Project
The landfill extension site will be a bowl-shape area with a large
void space in the middle for waste filling. The northwestern
and southeastern boundaries of the landfill extension
site follow the ridgelines to maximise the landfill capacity. Some set back of
the northern boundary is included to minimise the impact to woodland and Lin Ma
Hang Catchment. The total site area is about 70ha and the final height of the
landfill would not be exceeded +255 mPD (Figure 1.1 & Figure 1.2). Various activities during
construction, operation, restoration and aftercare of
landfill are discussed in the following sub-sections. The key design features
are summarised below:
Bottom liner
system separate waste mass and leachate from groundwater;
Landfill cells store waste
within the unit;
Storm water drainage system
collect rain water run off on the landfill;
Leachate collection system
collect liquid leaching from the waste mass and convey it to a leachate
treatment plant prior to discharging to Shek Wu Hui
Sewage Treatment Works;
Gas collection system collect
gases formed during the decomposition of waste. These gases will be treated and
utilised for production of electricity on site; and
Covering and capping seal off
the top of the landfill with a gas venting layer, an impermeable mineral layer,
a drainage layer of at least 0.5m and at least 1m of top soil.
1.3.4
Construction Phase
Activities
Simple excavation and slope formation works will be carried out
during the construction stage. The permanent works comprise cut and fill
earthworks, slope formation and earth wall construction. The temporary works
will involve the formations of temporary ditches along the sides of excavations
and associated drainage works, and material storage areas. During site
formation, sediment will be contained in permanent detention ponds/silt traps
that will be constructed according to landfill phasing. Final design and
location of sediment traps are yet to be decided, but
are likely to be down gradient of each landfill phase or in the downstream
valleys near the existing waste reception area. Where possible they will be
maintained during the operation of each phase to ensure the effective control
of operational soil erosion problem.
1.3.5
Operation Phase
Activities
During operation, waste will be disposed of at individual landfill
cells. Deposited waste will be compacted to thin layers of up to two metres in
thickness. The works will be maintained at a gradient of not greater than 1 in
3 to ensure the effectiveness of the compaction equipment. Daily cover (the
active tipping area shall be covered about at least 150mm of soil together with
a layer of Posi-Shell on completion of each days operation.) will be applied
to control environmental nuisances such as windblown litter, odour, vermin, flies and birds. There are other alternative biodegradable
materials for use as daily cover which may be applicable at NENTX, including:
Heavy duty reusable and
biodegradable sheets;
Biodegradable, non-reusable
plastic films;
Geotextiles; and
Foams and sprays.
1.3.6
Restoration Phase
Activities
Restoration is a process to restore a landfill site to a condition
suitable for afteruse. After completion of waste
filling, final capping will be applied to minimise infiltration of rainwater
into the waste mass thus reducing the amount of leachate generated. The capping
system normally includes a number of components
including topsoil, subsoil, drainage layer and barrier layer.
1.3.7
Aftercare Phase
Activities
Aftercare is the work done after the replacement of the soil and
includes cultivations, fertilisation, planting, construction of pathways,
access points, vegetation maintenance and an ongoing long-term commitment to
the restored landfill. Landscaped berms will be created
and tree planting will be provided during the aftercare period for aesthetic
purpose.
The Landfill Extension will start receiving waste only when the
Existing NENT Landfill has ceased operation. The timing of this has yet to be
determined as it depends on the rate of waste deliveries in the forthcoming
period. Based on current predictions, the capacity of the Existing Landfill
will probably run out by 2026, it is estimated that the operation commencement
date of the Phase 1 of NENTX will be in 2026 based on the tentative outline
programme.
Taking into account
of the time needed for mobilization and preparatory works prior to commencement
of receipt of waste, the EPD awarded the Landfill Extension contract in
February 2022. In order to ensure that new landfill
space will be available before the capacity of the existing landfill runs out.
The tentative outline Programme of Landfill Extension is
indicatively summarised in Appendix A.
The requirements of EM&A
programme should include the recommendations from the EIA study and with
reference to EPD's Environmental Monitoring and Audit Guidelines for
Development Projects in Hong Kong". Detailed requirements of the EM&A
programme for construction, operation, restoration and
aftercare phases of this Project are described in the following sections of
this updated EM&A Manual. Table 2.1 summarises the requirements at various phases of the
Project.
Table 2.1 Summary of
EM&A Requirements
Parameter(s) |
Project Phase |
||
Construction |
Operation/ Restoration |
Aftercare |
|
Dust |
√ |
√ |
√ |
Ambient Volatile Organic Compound
(VOC), Ammonia and hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) |
√ (a) |
√ |
√ |
Stack emission from LFG Generators, Flares and
Thermal Oxidizers |
|
√ |
√ (d) (Flare only) |
Odour |
|
√ |
√ (b) |
Surface Water |
√ |
√ |
√ |
Groundwater |
√ (a) |
√ |
√ |
Leachate |
|
√ |
√ |
Landfill Gas |
√ (a) |
√ |
√ |
Noise |
√ |
√ |
√ (b) |
Waste Management (c) |
√ |
√ |
|
Ecology (c) |
√ |
√ |
√ |
Landscape and Visual (c) |
√ |
√ |
√ |
Notes:
(a)
The
monitoring of VOCs, ammonia, H2S, groundwater and landfill gas
during construction would act as baseline monitoring for operation impact.
(b)
The
monitoring and audit of dust, odour and noise in aftercare phase will only be
required when there are major maintenance / maintenance works requiring
excavation of Waste.
(c)
EM&A
scope include audit works only.
(d)
Since
the leachate quantity will be significantly decreased during aftercare phase,
therefore, SBR tanks should be sufficient to treat the leachate to meet the
required standards without the need to operate the thermal oxidiser. Hence,
stack emission monitoring will only be conducted at flares only if the thermal
oxidiser is no longer in use.
The EM&A requirements recommended in
the EIA Report will ensure compliance with the specified mitigation measures.
An EM&A programme should be designed based on these requirements to achieve
the following key objectives:
Establishment
of existing environmental setting of the site to assist the development of
landfill design and to establish a baseline against which any adverse
environmental impacts can be evaluated;
Provision
of a database against which any short- or long-term environmental impacts of
the Project can be determined against the Project compliance with regulatory requirements,
standards and Government policies;
Verification
of environmental impacts predicted in the EIA study and provision of an early
indication of any failure of environmental control measures or practices to
achieve the acceptable standards;
Evaluation
of environmental impacts during site preparation works and operational phases
of the landfill extension project to assist the determination of effectiveness
of the mitigation measures to be implemented, ensure compliance with the
relevant environmental regulations, and design of any additional mitigation
measures requirements;
Provision
of information to enable environmental audit of Project activities during
construction, operation, restoration and aftercare
phases, and taking remedial action if unexpected problems or unacceptable
impacts arise; and
Provision
of a basis for long-term monitoring programme following the completion of works
during the aftercare phase.
The proposed project organisation of personnel involved in the EM&A
process is illustrated in Appendix B, which consists of
the Project Proponent (Environmental Infrastructure Division, Environmental Protection Department), Employers Representative (ER), Contractor,
Environmental Team (ET), Independent Environmental Checker (IEC), and
Independent Consultant (IC), etc. It should be established to take the
responsibilities for environmental protection for this landfill extension
project. The IEC as part of the IC to conduct independent auditing of the overall EM&A programme
including environmental and operation monitoring, implementation of mitigation
measures, EM&A submissions, and any other submissions required under the
Environmental Permit (EP). Veolia Environmental Services Hong Kong Limited is
the design-build-operate contractor appointed by EPD/EID (the Project
Proponent) who is responsible for carrying out design, construction, operation,
restoration and aftercare of the NENTX. The individual
responsibilities are:
Contractor
Implement environmental controls and mitigation as set out in this
EM&A Manual as well as any additional measure necessary for compliance with
the environmental control standards;
Assist the Project
Proponent to establish an ET to undertake the monitoring and reporting of the
EM&A requirements outlined in this EM&A Manual;
Submission of proposals of mitigation measures in case of
exceedances of Action and Limit (A/L) Levels in accordance with the Event and
Action Plan (EAP);
Implementation of mitigation measures to reduce the impacts where
A/L Levels are exceeded;
Participate in the site inspection undertaken by the ET and
undertake any corrective actions advised by the ET; and
Adherence to the agreed procedures for carrying out complaint
investigation.
Employers Representative (ER)
The ER is responsible for
overseeing the construction works and for ensuring that the works are
undertaken by the Contractor in accordance with the specification and contract
requirements. The duties and responsibilities of the ER with respect to
EM&A include:
To monitor the Contractors compliance with Contract
Specifications, including the effective
To monitor Contractors, ETs and IECs compliance with the
requirements in the Environmental Permit (EP) and EM&A Manual;
To facilitate ETs implementation of the EM&A programme;
Participate in joint site inspection by the ET and IEC;
To adhere to the procedures for carrying out complaint
investigation.
Setting up of all the
required environmental monitoring stations;
Monitoring of various
environmental parameters as required;
Analysis of monitoring and
audit data and review the success of EM&A programme to cost-effectively
confirm the adequacy of mitigation measures implemented and the validity of the
EIA predictions and to identify any adverse environmental impacts arising;
Carrying out site inspections
to investigate and audit the Contractors site practices, equipment and work
methodologies with respect to pollution control and environmental mitigation,
and take proactive actions to pre-empt problems;
Auditing and preparation of
audit reports on environmental monitoring data and site conditions;
Reporting of environmental
monitoring and audit results to the IEC, Contractor, IC and Project Proponent
or its delegated representative;
Recommendation of suitable
mitigation measures to the Contractor in case exceedance of A/L Levels in
accordance with the EAP; and
Undertaking of regular
on-site audits/ inspections and reporting to the Contractor and IC of any
potential non-compliance; and
Following up and closing out
of non-compliance actions.
IEC
An
IEC will be appointed, as part of the IC, who should verify the overall
environmental performance of the Project. The IEC should be responsible for
verifying all overall environmental performance of the Project. The IEC should
be responsible for verifying all environmental submission required under the
EM&A programme and EP to the EPD (EIAO Authority). The IEC should posses at least 7 years of experience in EM&A and/ or
environmental management. The IEC shall not be in any way an associated body of
the Contractor or the ET for the Project.
Reviewing of EM&A
programme by the ET (at not less than monthly intervals);
Auditing of monitoring
activities and results (at not less than monthly intervals);
Reporting of audit results to
the IC and Project Proponent in parallel;
Reviewing of EM&A reports
(monthly, quarterly and annual summary reports) submitted by the ET;
Reviewing of proposal of mitigation measures
submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the EAP;
Checking of mitigation
measures recommended in the EIA Report and updated EM&A Manual, and
ensuring they are properly implemented in timely manner when required; and
Reporting of findings of site
inspections and other environmental performance reviews to IC and Project
Proponent.
IC
The IC should be responsible for overseeing the Project undertaken
by the Contractor in accordance with the specification and contractual
requirements. The responsibilities for the IC include the following.
Verification and checking Contractors activities and ensure that
the requirements in the Contract Specifications, including the implementation
and operation of the environmental mitigation measures and other aspects of the
EM&A programme are fully complied with.
Sufficient and suitably qualified
professional and technical staff should be employed by the respective parties
to ensure full compliance with their duties and responsibilities, as required
under the EM&A programme for the duration of the Project.
The remainder of this updated EM&A Manual is set out as follows:
Section 2 Scope of the EM&A
Manual
Section 3 Details the
requirements for air quality and odour monitoring
Section 4 Details the requirements
for noise monitoring
Section 5 Details the
requirements for water quality monitoring
Section 6 Details the
requirements for waste management audit
Section 7 Details the
requirements for landfill gas monitoring
Section 8 Details the
requirements for landscape and visual monitoring
Section 9 Details the
requirements for cultural heritage monitoring
Section 10 Details the
requirements for ecological monitoring
Section 11 Describes the scope
and frequency of site inspection
Section 12 Details the EM&A
reporting requirements
This updated EM&A Manual is an evolving document that should be
updated to maintain its relevance as the Project progresses. The primary focus
for these updates will be to ensure the impacts predicted and the recommended mitigation
measures remain consistent and appropriate to the manner in which
the works are to be carried out. Any changes to the programme shall be
justified by the ET Leader and verified by the IEC before submission to the EIAO
Authority for approval.
A systematic Environmental Management Plan (EMP) should be developed
and implemented by the Contractor in accordance with the ETWB TC(W) 19/2005
Environmental Management on Construction Sites to ensure effective
implementation of the mitigation measures, monitoring and remedial requirements
presented in the EIA, EM&A and environmental mitigation implementation
schedule (EMIS) (Appendix C). The IEC should audit the
implementation status of EMP and advise the necessary remedial action as
required. Such remedial actions should be enforced through contractual
requirements. The EMP should be certified by the ET and verified by the IEC.
The EMP should require the Contractor (and sub-contractors) and ET
to define in details how to implement the recommended
mitigation measures in order to achieve the environmental performance
stipulated in the Hong Kong environmental legislation and EIA documents. The
review of on-site environmental performance should be undertaken by IEC through
a systematic checklist and audit once the construction commences. The
environmental performance review programme comprises a regular assessment on
the effectiveness of the EMP.
The EMP should summarise the requirements for the Contractor to
submit a Landfill Monitoring Plan (LMP) and an Emergency Response Plan (ERP)
for approval. The LMP should describe the procedures and provide details of the
environmental monitoring programme for the Contractor to carry out throughout
the construction, operation, restoration and aftercare
phases of the Project. The ERP should address various scenarios within NENT
Landfill Extension, in particular in the event of leakage of LFG/ leachate,
failure of LFG/ leachate treatment operation, fire, chemicaI/
DG spillage, etc.
If the Contractor would adopt alternative construction methods or
implementation schedules, the detailed modifications of methodology and
equipment should be submitted to the IEC for approval prior to the commencement
of works. Any changes in construction methods should be indicated in the
revised EMP. The Contractor should review the EMIS with respect to the design
developments and construction methodology. All necessary mitigation measures
identified and recommended in the EIA study are summarised in the EMIS, which
specifies the extent, locations, time frame and responsibilities for the
implementation of the environmental mitigation measures identified.
The Contractor should
develop the waste management requirements as part of the EMP in Section 2.3
above for the construction phase of the Project. The Contractor should also
prepare a Waste Management Plan (WMP) for the Project during the operational,
restoration and aftercare phases. Where waste generation is unavoidable, any
opportunities for recycling or reuse of the wastes should be maximised. If the
wastes cannot be recycled, recommendations for appropriate disposal routes
should be provided in the WMP. A method statement for stockpiling and
transportation of the excavated materials and other construction wastes should
also be included in the WMP and approved before the commencement of
construction. All mitigation measures arising from the approved WMP should be
fully implemented. The WMP should be certified by the ET and verified by IEC.
It is not anticipated that
any significant quantities of excavated C&D materials would require
off-site disposal, as most will be reused on-site. Notwithstanding this, a
trip-ticket system should be put in place in accordance with Development Bureau
Technical Circular (Works) No 6/2010. Copies/ counterfoils from trip-tickets
(showing the quantities of C&D Materials taken off-site) should be kept for
record purposes.
For the
purpose of enhancing the management of
Construction and Demolition (C&D) materials including rock, and minimising
its generation at source, construction would be undertaken in accordance with
the Environment, Transport and Works Bureau Technical Circular (Works) No
33/2002 - Management of Construction and Demolition Material Including Rock, or
its latest versions. The management measures stipulated in the Technical
Circular should be incorporated.
Prior to the commencement of construction works, the baseline
conditions of environmental parameters should be established at designated
monitoring locations to determine the nature and ranges of natural variation
and to demonstrate the suitability of the proposed impact, control
and reference monitoring locations in the EM&A programme. The baseline
conditions of the following environmental parameters should be established by
the ET, including construction dust, noise and surface water monitoring before
commencement of construction and Odour, VOC off-site surface gas, groundwater and cultural heritage, they will be conducted
before operation of the Project.
For the baseline monitoring of ecology, there are no details
information in the EP and EM&A Manual.
The ecology monitoring will be conducted based on the approved Detailed
Vegetation Surveys and Transplantation Proposal and Translocation Proposal (i.e. Environmental Permit submissions for Clause 2.5 and Clause 2.6
of Further Environmental Permit). The monitoring details of the establishment
of the endemic freshwater crab, Somanniathelphusa
zanklon community in the translocation site has
been included in Section 10.6 of this EM&A Manual for fulfilling EIA Report
Approval Condition No. 4 (Register No.: AEIAR-111/2017) on 20 September 2007.
During the implementation of the Project, environmental monitoring
should be conducted at designated monitoring locations to detect the changes of
environmental parameters attributed to the Project. Impact monitoring should be
conducted during all phases of the Project. The environmental monitoring
parameters during construction phase and operation phase should include air
quality, noise, water quality (surface water), ecology (vegetation and
biodiversity), landscape and visual. The monitoring during operational,
restoration and aftercare phases should include all parameters of construction
phase, in addition to leachate and LFG.
The A/L Levels should be defined for environmental monitoring at
designated monitoring locations exceeding which a prescribed response should be
required. Individual A/L Levels should be quantitatively defined for the
respective environmental monitoring parameters according to the following basic
principles:
2.8.1
Action Level
Action Levels indicate deteriorating ambient environmental quality
potentially due to the Project implementation. It acts as a sign to trigger
appropriate remedial actions in order to rectify any
mat-practices or non-conformance of Project activities thereby preventing the
deterioration of environmental quality and to resume the ambient environmental
quality back to normal levels.
2.8.2
Limit Level
Limit Levels are the statutory and/of
contractual levels below which environmental conditions are considered unacceptable.
If Limit Levels were exceeded, the relevant part of the works should not be
continued without implementation of immediate remedial action, including a
critical review of plant and working methods.
The EAP should lay down the systematic procedures for implementation
in case exceedances of A/L Levels and environmental complaints in order to timely address, investigate and resolve such
incidents and minimise their recurrence. The EAP should define the action under
specific conditions, i.e. exceedances of A/L Levels,
and trigger the relevant partied in the EM&A programme to take the action.
Environmental audit should include the following components:
Regular inspection of site
practices should be conducted to assess and ensure the environmental protection
and pollution control measures to be in accordance with the EIA recommendations
and complied with contract specifications;
Examination of all available
information related to the investigation of the nature and cause of actual,
potential and cumulative environmental impacts and compIaints/
queries;
Proposal for remedial measures
for resolution of impacts, effective implementation of proposed mitigation
measures, documentation and summary of audit findings, and liaison and
consultation with the public and concerned parties on the effects of such
remedial works; and
Enquiries and complaints related to the environmental performance of
the Project should be anticipated from individuals and organisations, which
should be referred to the ET Leader for investigation and action. Systematic
procedures for environmental complaints should be established and followed.
During the complaint investigation, the Contractor and IEC should facilitate
the ET by providing all necessary information.
2.11.1
Baseline Monitoring
Baseline
Monitoring Reports for Construction Phase and Operation Phases should be
prepared by the ET and submitted within 4 weeks of completion of baseline
monitoring data and findings. The Reports should be certified by the ET and
verified by the IEC prior to submission to the EPD.
2.11.2
Impact Monitoring
Monthly
EM&A Reports should be prepared by the ET and submitted within 2 weeks
after the end of the reporting month during construction, operational,
restoration and aftercare phases to include all the impact monitoring data, findings and recommendations. Quarterly Summary, Annual
Review and Final Review EM&A Reports should be prepared by the ET and
submitted within 10 days of each reporting quarter, reporting year and
cessation of project phase, respectively, during construction and operational,
restoration, and aftercare phases to include all the summary of monitoring
trends, findings and recommendations. These reports
should be certified by the ET and verified by the IEC prior to formal
submission to the EPD.
To implement
the EM&A programme according to the Construction and Operational Phases,
Restoration Phase and Aftercare Phase in which different EM&A requirements
should be imposed, the ET and IEC should notify the EPD the completion of
EM&A programme for the specific Project phases and request for agreement to
cease the EM&A programme.
3.1.1
Air Quality Parameters
Monitoring of the Total Suspended
Particulate (TSP) levels shall be carried out by the ET to ensure that any
deteriorating air quality could be readily detected
and timely action be taken to rectify the situation. 1-hour and 24-hour TSP
levels should be measured to indicate the impacts of construction dust on air
quality. The TSP levels shall be measured by following the standard high volume
sampling method as set out in the Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
USA, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B. Upon approval by the IEC, 1-hour TSP
levels can be measured by direct reading methods which are capable of producing
comparable results as that by the high volume sampling
method, to indicate short event impacts.
All relevant data including
temperature, pressure, weather conditions, elapsed-time meter reading for the
start and stop of the sampler, identification and weight of the filter paper,
and other special phenomena and work progress of the concerned site etc. shall
be recorded down in details.
3.1.2
Monitoring Equipment
High volume sampler (HVS) in compliance with the
following specifications should be used for carrying out the 24-hr TSP monitoring:
0.6-1.7
m3/min (20-60 SCFM) adjustable flow range;
equipped
with a timing/control device with +/- 5 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
installed
with elapsed-time meter with +/- 2 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
capable
of providing a minimum exposed area of 406 cm2 (63 in2);
flow
control accuracy: +/- 2.5% deviation over 24-hr sampling period;
equipped
with a shelter to protect the filter and sampler;
incorporated
with an electronic mass flow rate controller or other equivalent devices;
equipped
with a flow recorder for continuous monitoring;
provided
with a peaked roof inlet;
incorporated
with a manometer;
able
to hold and seal the filter paper to the sampler housing at horizontal position;
easy
to change the filter; and
capable
of operating continuously for 24-hr period.
The ET
Leader is responsible for provision of the monitoring equipment. He shall
ensure that sufficient number of HVSs with an appropriate
calibration kit are available for carrying out the baseline monitoring, regular
impact monitoring and ad hoc monitoring. The HVSs shall be equipped with an
electronic mass flow controller and be calibrated against a traceable standard
at regular intervals. All the equipment, calibration kit, filter papers, etc.
shall be clearly labelled.
Initial
calibration of dust monitoring equipment shall be conducted upon installation
and thereafter at bi-monthly intervals. The transfer standard shall be
traceable to the internationally recognised primary standard and be calibrated
annually. The calibration data shall be properly documented for future
reference. All the data should be converted into standard
temperature and pressure condition. The flow-rate of
the sampler before and after the sampling exercise with the filter in position
shall be verified to be constant and be recorded down in the data sheet.
If the ET
Leader proposes to use a direct reading dust meter to measure 1-hr TSP levels. ET
shall submit sufficient information to the IEC to prove that the instrument is capable of achieving a comparable result as that of the
HVS and may be used for the 1-hr sampling. The 1-hr dust meter should be
calibrated every year and the 1-hr sampling shall be determined periodically by
HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by direct
reading method.
Wind data
monitoring equipment shall also be provided and set up at conspicuous locations
for logging wind speed and wind direction near to the dust monitoring
locations. The equipment installation location shall be proposed by the ET
Leader and agreed with the ER. For installation and operation of wind data
monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
the wind sensors should be
installed on masts at an elevated level 10m above ground so that they are clear
of obstructions or turbulence caused by the buildings;
the wind data should be
captured by a data logger and to be downloaded for processing at least once a month;
the wind data monitoring
equipment should be re-calibrated at least once every six months; and
wind direction should be
divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees each.
In exceptional
situations, the ET Leader may propose alternative methods to obtain
representative wind data upon approval from IEC and agreement from EPD.
3.1.3
Laboratory
Measurement/Analysis
A
clean laboratory with constant temperature and humidity control, and equipped
with necessary measuring and conditioning instruments, to handle the dust
samples collected, shall be available for sample analysis, and equipment
calibration and maintenance. The laboratory should be HOKLAS accredited.
If a site laboratory is set up or a
non-HOKLAS accredited laboratory is hired for carrying out the laboratory
analysis, the laboratory equipment shall be approved by the IEC and the
measurement procedures (first measurement) shall be witnessed by the IEC. The
ET Leader shall provide the IEC with one copy of the Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B for his reference.
Filter paper of size 8"x10"
shall be labelled before sampling. It shall be a clean filter paper with no pin
holes and shall be conditioned in a humidity controlled
chamber for over 24-hr and be pre-weighed before use for the sampling.
After sampling, the filter paper
loaded with dust shall be kept in a clean and tightly sealed plastic bag. The
filter paper is then returned to the laboratory for reconditioning in the humidity controlled chamber followed by accurate weighing by
an electronic balance with a readout down to 0.1 mg. The balance shall be
regularly calibrated against a traceable standard. All the collected samples
shall be kept in a good condition for 6 months before disposal.
3.1.4
Monitoring Locations
The dust
monitoring locations are shown in Table
3.1. If the locations of dust sensitive receivers may change after issuing
this manual, the ET Leader shall propose updated monitoring locations and seek
approval from IEC and agreement from EPD on the proposal.
The purpose of
monitoring (to minimize potential impact and to safeguard the residential)
should be clearly stipulated. The specification, wiring, fixing, maintenance, communication and payment of electricity cost shall be
detailed in the letter. If there is objection from the owner, alternative
monitoring location at premises in the vicinity shall be identified and seek
approval from ER and agreed with IEC. The monitoring location is illustrated in
Figure
3.1.
Table 3.1
Description of dust monitoring locations
Air Monitoring Location ID |
Representative for |
Land Uses |
Monitoring Parameters |
AM1 |
Tung Lo Hang |
Residential |
1-hr and 24-hrTSP |
AM2* |
Heung Yuen Wai |
Residential |
1-hr and 24-hrTSP |
AM3* |
Wo Keng Shan Tsuen |
Residential |
1-hr and 24-hrTSP |
Notes: * The original station AM(D)2
and AM(D)3 are proposed to change to AM2 and AM3 respectively. Detailed
location please refer to (Figure 3.1).
When
alternative monitoring locations are proposed, the following criteria, as far
as practicable, should be followed:
At the site boundary or such
locations close to the major dust emission source;
Close to the sensitive
receptors; and
Account for the prevailing
meteorological conditions.
The ET shall agree
with the IEC on the position of the HVS for installation of the monitoring
equipment. When positioning the samplers, the following points shall be noted:
a horizontal platform with
appropriate support to secure the samplers against gusty wind should be provided;
no two samplers should be
placed less than 2 metres apart;
the distance between the
sampler and an obstacle, such as buildings, must be at least twice the height
that the obstacle protrudes above the sampler;
a minimum of 2 metres
separation from walls, parapets and penthouses is required for rooftop samplers;
a minimum of 2 metres
separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally is required;
no furnace or incinerator flue
is nearby;
airflow around the sampler is unrestricted;
the sampler is more than 20
metres from the drip-line;
any wire fence and gate, to
protect the sampler, should not cause any obstruction during monitoring;
permission must be obtained to
set up the samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring stations; and
a secured supply of electricity
is needed to operate the samplers.
3.1.5
Baseline Monitoring
The
ET shall carry out baseline monitoring at all of the
designated monitoring locations for at least 14 consecutive days prior to the
commencement of the construction works to obtain daily 24-hr TSP samples.
1-hour sampling shall also be done at least 3 times per day while the highest
dust impact is expected. During the baseline monitoring, there should not be
any construction or dust generation activities in the vicinity of the
monitoring stations.
In
case the baseline monitoring cannot be carried out at the designated monitoring
locations during the baseline monitoring period, the ET Leader shall carry out
the monitoring at alternative locations which can effectively represent the
baseline conditions at the impact monitoring locations. The alternative
baseline monitoring locations shall be approved by IEC and agreed with EPD.
In
exceptional case, when insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable
results are obtained, the ET Leader shall liaise with EPD to agree on an
appropriate set of data to be used as a baseline reference and submit to IEC
for approval.
If
the baseline level for air quality exceeds the limit level, the ET shall carry
out an investigation to determine the cause of the exceedance in consultation
with EPD. Regardless of whether the exceedance was caused by poor weather
condition (e.g. high API) or as a result of inadequate
control measures on construction activities being carried out on other nearby
construction sites, a second set of baseline monitoring shall be conducted by
the ET to determine an appropriate baseline level for the EM&A programme in
agreement with EPD.
Ambient
conditions may vary seasonally and shall be reviewed at every three months. If
the ET Leader considers that the ambient conditions have been changed and a
repeat of the baseline monitoring is required to be carried out for obtaining
the updated baseline levels, the monitoring should be at times when the
Contractors activities are not generating dust, at least in the proximity of
the monitoring stations. Should change in ambient conditions be determined, the
baseline levels and, in turn, the air quality criteria, should be revised. The
revised baseline levels and air quality criteria should be agreed with EPD.
3.1.6
Impact Monitoring
The ET Leader shall
carry out impact monitoring during the course of the
Works. For regular impact monitoring, the sampling frequency of at least once
in every six-days, shall be strictly observed at all the monitoring stations
for 24-hr TSP monitoring. For 1-hr TSP monitoring, the sampling frequency of at
least three times in every six-days should be undertaken when the highest dust
impact occurs. The specific time to start and stop the 24- hr TSP monitoring
shall be clearly defined for each location and be strictly followed by the
Contractor.
In case of
non-compliance with the dust criteria, more frequent monitoring exercise, as
specified in the Action Plan in Section 3.1.7, shall be conducted within 24
hours after the result is obtained. This additional monitoring shall be
continued until the excessive dust emission or the deterioration in air quality
is rectified.
3.1.7
Event and Action
The baseline
monitoring results form the basis for determining the air quality criteria for
the impact monitoring. The ET Leader shall compare the impact monitoring
results with air quality criteria set up for 24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP. Table
3.2 shows the dust criteria, namely Action and Limit levels to be used.
Should non-compliance of the air quality criteria occur, the ET, the IEC and
the Contractor shall undertake the relevant action in accordance with the
Action Plan in Table 3.3.
Table 3.2 Action
and limit levels for dust impact
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
24-hr TSP
Level in mg/m3 |
For baseline level < 200 mg/m3, Action level = (130% of
baseline level + Limit level)/2 For baseline level > 200 mg/m3, Action level = Limit
level |
260 mg/m3 |
1-ur TSP Level
in mg/m3 |
For baseline level < 384 mg/m3, Action
level = (130% of baseline level + Limit level)/2 For baseline level > 384 mg/m3, Action level = Limit level |
500 mg/m3 |
Table 3.3
Event/Action plan for dust impact
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Action Level |
|||
Exceedance for one sample |
Identify
source
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance
Inform
IEC and Contractor
Repeat
measurement to confirm findings
Increase
monitoring frequency to daily if exceedance is due to the Project and
continue until the monitoring results reduce to below action level |
Verify
the Notification of Exceedance
Check
monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor's working methods
Discuss
with ET and Contractor on proposed remedial measures |
Rectify
any unacceptable practice
Amend
working methods if appropriate |
Exceedance for two or more consecutive
samples |
Identify source Prepare Notification of Exceedance Inform Contractor and IEC Repeat measurements to confirm findings Increase monitoring frequency to daily
if exceedance is due to the Project and continue until the monitoring results
reduce to below action level Discuss with IEC for remedial action required Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented Continue monitoring at daily intervals
if exceedance is due to the Project If no exceedance for 3 consecutive days,
cease additional monitoring |
Verify the Notification of Exceedance Check monitoring data submitted by ET
and Contractor's working methods Discuss with ET and Contractor on
proposed remedial measures Review with analysed results submitted
by ET Review the proposed remedial measures
by Contractor Supervise the implementation of
remedial measures |
Submit proposals for remedial actions
to IEC within 3 working days of notification Implement the agreed proposals Amend proposal if appropriate |
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Limit Level |
|||
Exceedance
for one sample |
Identify
source
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance
Inform
IEC and Contractor
Repeat
measurement to confirm findings
Increase
monitoring frequency to daily if exceedance is due to the Project and
continue until the monitoring results reduce to below limit level
Assess
effectiveness of Contractor's remedial actions and keep IEC informed of the
results |
Verify
the Notification of Exceedance
Check
monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor's working methods
Discuss
with ET and Contractor potential remedial actions
Supervise
the implementation of remedial measures |
Take
immediate action to avoid further exceedance
Submit
proposals for remedial actions to IEC within 3 working days of notification
Implement
the agreed proposals
Amend
proposal if appropriate |
Exceedance for two or more consecutive samples |
Identify source Prepare Notification of Exceedance Inform IEC and EPD the causes and
actions taken for the exceedances Discuss with IEC for remedial action required Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented Assess effectiveness of Contractors
remedial actions and keep IEC and EPD informed of the results
Increase monitoring frequency to daily
if exceedance is due to the Project and continue until the monitoring results
reduce to below limit level If exceedance stops, cease additional
monitoring |
Verify the Notification of Exceedance Check monitoring data submitted by ET
and Contractor's working methods Discuss amongst ET and Contractor on
the potential remedial actions. Review Contractor's remedial actions
whenever necessary to assure their effectiveness Supervise the implementation of
remedial measures |
Take immediate action to avoid further
exceedance Submit proposals for remedial actions
to IEC of notification Implement the agreed proposals Resubmit proposals if problem still
not under control Stop the relevant activity of works
until the exceedance is abated |
3.1.8
Dust Mitigation Measures
The EIA report has
recommended dust control and mitigation measures. The Contractor shall be
responsible for the design and implementation of these measures:
Dust emission from construction
vehicle movement are confined within the work sites
area;
Watering facilities will be
provided at every designated vehicular exit point; and
Good site
practice is recommended during construction phase. Covering with impermeable sheet should be
provided for the inactive tipping area.
If the above measures are not
sufficient to restore the air quality to acceptable levels upon the advice of
ET Leader, the Contractor shall liaise with the ET Leader on some other mitigation
measures, propose to IEC for approval, and implement the mitigation measures.
3.2.1
Odour Intensity Analysis
Odour Intensity
Analysis is conducted by independent trained personnel / competent persons
patrolling and sniffing around the Air Sensitive Receiver to detect any odour
at the concerned hours.
The independent
trained personnel / competent persons shall
have their individual odour
threshold of n-butanol in nitrogen gas in the range of 20 to 80 ppb/v required
by the European Standard Method (EN 13725);
be at least 16 years of age and
willing and able to follow instructions;
be free from any respiratory diseases;
be engaged for a sufficient
period to build up and monitor/detect at several monitoring location;
not be allowed to smoke, eat,
drink (except water) or use chewing gum or sweets 30min before and during odour
intensity analysis;
take great care not to cause
any interference with their own perception or that of others by lack of
personal hygiene or the use of perfumes, deodorants, body lotions or cosmetics;
and
not communicate with each other
about the results of their choices.
At least three
independent trained personnel / competent persons shall be selected to form a
patrol team to conduct the odour intensity analysis, who should participate in
a set of screening tests.
Subject to the
prevailing weather forecast condition, odour intensity analysis shall be conducted
by independent trained personnel / competent persons at the downwind locations.
During the analysis, the sequence should start from less odorous locations to
stronger odorous locations.
The independent
trained personnel / competent persons shall use their nose (olfactory sensors)
to sniff odours at different locations. The main odour emission sources and the
areas to be affected by the odour nuisance shall be identified.
The perceived odour
intensity is to be divided into 5 levels which are ranked in the descending
order as follows
0 - Not detected. No odour
perceived or an odour so weak that it can not be
easily characterised or described;
1 - Slight Identifiable odour,
and slight chance to have odour nuisance;
2 - Moderate Identifiable
odour, and moderate chance to have odour nuisance;
3 - Strong Identifiable, likely
to have odour nuisance; and
4 - Extreme Severe odour, and
unacceptable odour level.
The independent
trained personnel / competent persons shall record the findings including odour
intensity, odour nature and possible odour sources, and also
the local wind speed and direction at each location. In addition, some relevant
meteorological data such as daily average temperature, and daily average
humidity, on that surveyed day shall be obtained from the Hong Kong Observatory
Station for reference.
3.2.2
Odour Patrol
Apart from odour
intensity analysis, routine odour patrol by competent persons shall also be
conducted to detect odour nuisance.
3.2.3
Odour Intensity Analysis / Odour Patrol Locations
The odour intensity
analysis and odour patrol locations are shown in Table 3.4. The status
and locations of air sensitive receivers may change after issuing this manual.
If such cases exist, the ET Leader shall propose updated monitoring locations
and seek approval from ER and agreed with IEC on the proposal. The monitoring
location is illustrated in Figure
3.1.
Table 3.4
Description of odour monitoring locations
AML ID |
FOIAR
ASR ID |
Location [1] |
Land Uses |
Monitoring Parameters |
AM(O)1 |
A1 |
Wo Keng Shan Tsuen |
Residential |
Odour Intensity |
AM(O)2 |
A7 |
Heung
Yuen Wai |
Residential |
Odour Intensity |
AM(O)3 |
A8 |
Tsung
Yuen Ha |
Residential |
Odour Intensity |
AM(O)4 |
A9 |
Ha Heung Yuen |
Residential |
Odour
Intensity |
AM(O)5* |
A27 |
Tong To Shan Tsuen |
Residential |
Odour Intensity |
AM(O)5a* |
A10 |
Lin
Ma Hang |
Residential |
Odour Intensity |
AM(O)6 |
A11 |
Tung Lo Hang |
Residential |
Odour Intensity |
AM(O)7 |
A12-2 |
Chuk Yuen |
Residential |
Odour Intensity |
AM(O)8 |
A13 |
Nga Yiu Ha |
Recreational |
Odour Intensity |
AM(O)9 |
A14 |
Ping Yeung |
Residential |
Odour Intensity |
Remark:
1.
Odour intensity analysis and odour patrol shall only be conducted
for the downwind monitoring locations.
2.
FOIAR ASR ID refer to the representative ASRs from Final
Odour Impact Assessment Report for NENTX
3.
* : In
accordance with EP Condition 2.18 and FEP Condition 2.16, early morning odour
patrol at AM(O)5 shall be arranged at Tong To Shan Tsuen if a resident is
identified during the site walk (once every three months) to Tong To Shan
Tsuen. In case no residents are identified during the site walk, the odour
monitoring shall be arranged at the alternative location (i.e..
AM(O)5a).
3.2.4
Event and Action
Table 3.5 shows the Action and Limit levels to be used, and the patrol
frequency is listed in Table 3.6. Should non-compliance of the air
quality criteria occur, the ET, the IC/IEC and the Contractor shall undertake
the relevant action in accordance with the Action Plan in Table 3.7.
Table 3.5 Action
and limit levels for odour nuisance
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
Odour
Nuisance (From
odour intensity analysis or odour patrol) |
When
two documented complaint are received; or Odour
Intensity of 2 is measured from odour intensity analysis. |
Five
or more consecutive genuine documented complaints within a week; or Odour
Intensity of 3 or above is measured from odour intensity analysis. |
Table 3.6 Odour
Intensity Analysis and Odour Patrol Frequency
Routine
Mode |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Odour Patrol: Once every six days during the following period: early morning; and peak tipping hour (e.g.
11:00am) Odour Intensity Analysis: Quarterly during the following period: early morning; and peak tipping hour (e.g.
11:00am) |
Daily odour patrol. Weekly odour intensity analysis for 2 period during: early morning; and peak tipping hour (e.g.11:00am) |
Daily odour patrol. Daily odour intensity analysis for 2 period during: early morning; and peak tipping hour (e.g.
11:00am) |
Table 3.7 Event/Action plan for odour nuisance
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Action Level |
Identify source Inform IEC and Contractor If nuisance stops or external source has been identified, resume
monitoring to routine mode Recommend precautionary measures |
Review submissions and reports from ET Supervise the implementation of precautionary
measures |
Rectify any unacceptable practice Review the operation of odour enhancement facilities at leachate
treatment plants Amend working methods if appropriate Carry out precautionary measures |
Limit
Level |
Identify source
Inform IEC the causes and actions taken
for the nuisance
Carry out analysis of Contractors
working procedures to determine possible mitigation to be implemented
Assess effectiveness of Contractors
remedial actions and keep IEC, EPD informed of the results
If nuisance stops or external source
has been identified, resume monitoring to routine mode |
Discuss amongst ET Leader and Contractor on the
potential remedial actions Review Contractor's remedial actions whenever
necessary to assure their effectiveness Supervise the implementation of remedial measures |
Take immediate action to avoid further nuisance
Submit proposals for remedial actions
to IEC within 3 working days of notification
Proposals include tipping at the far
end of the upwind location; thicker daily cover can be arranged in case odour
patrol identify potential odour nuisance; and use of immediate soil cover for
sewage sludge, animal waste
Implement the agreed proposals
Resubmit proposals if problem still not
under control |
3.3.1
Precautionary measures
shall be adopted by the future Contactor to avoid and minimise adverse impact
during operational and restoration stage of NENTX Landfill. Key measures are summarised
below:
3.3.2
Stack Discharge from
ASP, Flare and LFG Power Generator
The maximum allowable discharge
limit for ASP, flare and LFG power generator should be specified in the design
specification.
Owing to the requirement for
the installation of stack, the design requirement shall be submitted to IEC and
IC for vetting by the Contractor under the Air Pollution Control (Furnaces, Ovens and Chimneys) (Installation and Alternation)
Regulations.
Subject to the subsequent EPD's
requirement on chimney installation, once every 3 months regular stack
monitoring of vinyl chloride, benzene, TOC, NOX, and SO2
shall be carried out to demonstrate compliance during the operations.
A monthly monitoring report
should be prepared by ET and submitted to IEC for approval.
3.3.3
Odour from Leachate
Treatment Facilities
For the proposed
leachate treatment plant in NENT Landfill Extension, the overall leachate
treatment facilities include:
All new raw leachate storage
tanks stripped leachate holding tanks, SBRs, treated leachate holding tanks and
sludge holding tanks shall be installed with covers and deodourisers.
The covers will be air tight to prevent release of
odour from the facilities into atmosphere. Foul air underneath the covers will
be drawn through deodourisers and be discharged after
treatment. The deodourisers shall be designed for
odour removal efficiency of at least 99%.
Adopted updated treatment
method such as Sequencing Batch Reactor for future leachate treatment.
Provision of ventilated cover for the leachate storage lagoons / storage tanks
and emissions extracted to suitable odour removal filters with odour removal
efficiency of 99%.
Ferric nitrate, sodium
hypochlorite or ferric chloride can be added to oxidise the odourous
chemical in the leachate. The pH value of leachate can be controlled to a
suitable value from future on- site experiment such that the generation of any odourous H2S and ammonia can be optimised.
For the gaseous extraction
system, the wind speed immediately above the leachate surface should be kept to
minimal (in the order of 1E-3 m/s) such that the odour emission strength from
lagoon can be minimised. Suitable treatment system should be provided for odour
removal. The ventilated gaseous emission from lagoons should be provided with 5
- 10 air change per hour for further dilution before discharge.
The notional centre of the
future discharge point (e.g. stack) shall be located
at a location with maximum setback distance from the ASRs and further away from
the notional centre of the lagoons. The location of discharge point and
discharge height should be determined at the detailed design stage to ensure
that the odour criterion at the ASRs will not be exceeded.
The overall arrangement should
be investigated in details by the Contractor and
agreed with IEC and EPD. As such, the odour emission from the future leachate
treatment facilities will be insignificant.
3.3.4
Odour from Waste
Transfer Activities
The following are
some odour precautionary measures that shall be considered by EPD and FEHD:
As an improvement measure to
enhance to environmental standard for waste transfer, EPD could take the
initiative to recommend others to use enclosed type RCVs (dominantly government
vehicles and sludge vehicles).
Clearing / watering of the
surface and clearing of the waste water receptor of
government RCV is recommended before leaving refuse transfer station or
government Refuse Collection Point (FEHD).
3.3.5
Precautionary Odour from
Waste Tipping Activities
The use of alternative daily cover (less permeable layer) instead of
inert material should be considered under worst-case weather condition, subject
to EM&A Programme.
The use of immediate daily cover for odorous waste such as sewage sludge,
animal waste etc. under critical condition should also be considered, subject
to EM&A Programme.
For the time being, there is no population in the derelict Tong To Shan Tsuen. If there is new
residents moving in, thicker daily cover / alternative daily cover should be
applied at phase 3 of the extension site such that the emission strength for
the night time can be reduced (similar performance as that in the inactive
tipping area). Odour patrol at Tong To Shan Tsuen
should be arranged during night time / early morning in order to ensure the
effectiveness of the measures.
In accordance with some reference from New Zealand, odour from
active tipping area can be much reduced if the waste is covered by sandwich
covering material such that it is confined in a solid/semi solid condition.
Such covering material will be acted as sandwich protective layers to block the
interaction of waste. Only diffusion mode (small scale) will be present. These
would be applied during very hot and stable weather condition. Twice daily
covering (mid day and close of business) can be
arranged in case odour patrol identify potential odour nuisance, subject to
EM&A Programme.
During stable and calm weather condition and subject to EM&A
programme, tipping could be arranged to further increase the setback distance.
Only one active waste tipping area, with size of not greater than
1,200m2 shall be operated at NENTX landfill.
Active waste tipping faces shall be compacted and covered with 150
mm thick soil and Posi-shell at the end of each working day.
The special wastes after disposal at the special trench shall be
immediately covered with 300mm soil and shall be covered by another 150 mm soil
and Posi-shell at the end of each working day.
All inactive phases of NENTX shall be covered with 300 mm to 600 mm
thick soil and impermeable liner.
All tipping areas shall be
installed with final capping during the restoration and aftercare stage.
3.3.6
VOC Surface Emission
The VOC monitoring requirements
are discussed in Section 7. Details will be further established in the Landfill
Monitoring Plan (LMP) to be developed by the Contractor based on Updated
EM&A Manual for landfill gas monitoring.
Subject to future engineering
design, the arrangement of the landfill gas collection system and surface
covering material for inactive tipping area shall be reviewed by Contractor
every 5 year to identify any modern technology/arrangement (covering material,
LFG well spacing and locations) and the latest WHO/USEPA health-risk criteria.
A working team shall be formulated to review all processes, control practice
and extraction system in order to maximise the
efficiency of the system. A review report should be prepared by the Contractor
for the submission to IEC on the implementation/arrangement of LFG extraction
system. The first review report should be submitted to IEC for agreement before
commencement. With a good system to collect LFG (high extraction efficiency),
surface release of VOC to the nearby environment can be much reduced or
utilised.
Maintain a slightly negative
pressure within the entire tipping area (by suction). Minimise any potential
leakage of LFG to the surrounding by increase the number of gas-extraction
wells. Improve the extraction efficiency by checking/reinstate gas wells with
abnormally low extraction rate due to blockage/soil movement or sedimentation.
Increase the coverage of
inactive tipping area with HDPE/plastic sheet which can enhance the anaerobic
decomposition (reduce air getting in and VOC leaking out).
EM&A will be conducted at
ASR to establish the future VOC ambient level one year before (as baseline) and
one year after the commissioning of NENT extension operation. This monitoring
work should be carried out in a frequency once every 3 months during the period
when the ASP and flare are not in operation (only have the contribution from
surface emission). Benzene and vinyl chloride are the key monitoring
parameters. By comparing the monitoring data at the boundary and at ASR, the
cause of VOC and the general downwind dispersion effect (dilution effect) from
the boundary to the ASR can be identified. This monitoring should be repeated
by the Contractor once every 5 year and the findings should be incorporated
into the landfill gas collection system review report as mentioned above.
The monitoring location is
listed in Table 3.8 and illustrated in Figure
3.1. This off-site VOC monitoring report shall be submitted to IEC for
vetting.
Table 3.8
Off-site Surface gas monitoring locations at ASRs
AML
ID |
EIA
ASR Ref |
Location
|
Land
Uses |
Monitoring
Indicator |
AM(V)1 |
ASR1 |
Wo Keng Shan Tsuen (West of NENT
Extension) |
Residential |
Benzene and
Vinyl Chloride |
AM(V)2 |
ASR3 |
Cheung
Shan Monastery (South
of NENT Extension) |
Religions |
Benzene
and Vinyl Chloride |
AM(V)3 |
ASR10 |
Lin Ma Hang (North of NENT Extension) |
Residential |
Benzene and
Vinyl Chloride |
AM(V)4 |
ASR27 |
Tong To Shan Tsuen (North-east
of NENT Extension) |
Only
if it is occupied by residents |
Benzene
and Vinyl Chloride |
4.1.1
Construction Noise
Construction noise level shall be measured
in terms of the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level (LAeq). LAeq
30min shall be used as the monitoring parameter for the time period between 0700 and 1900 hours on normal weekdays.
For all other time periods, LAeq 5min
shall be employed for comparison with the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO)
criteria. As supplementary information for data auditing, statistical results
such as L10 and L90 shall also be obtained for reference.
4.1.2
Operational and Traffic
Noise
The noise level shall be measured in terms of
the A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure level over a period of 30
minutes (LAeq, 30mins) and
A-weighted 10% of time over a period of one hour (LA10,1hr) for
operational noise and operational traffic noise, respectively. As supplementary
information for data auditing, statistical results such LA10, LAeq and LA90 shall also be obtained
for reference.
In accordance with the Technical Memorandum
(TM) issued under the Noise Control Ordinance (NCO), sound level meters in
compliance with the International Electrotechnical Commission Publications 651:
1979 (Type 1) and 804: 1985 (Type 1) specifications shall be used for carrying
out the noise monitoring. Immediately prior to and following each noise
measurement, the accuracy of the sound level meter shall be checked using an
acoustic calibrator generating a known sound pressure level at a known
frequency. Measurements may be accepted as valid only if the calibration level
from before and after the noise measurement agree to within 1.0dB.
The ET Leader shall be responsible for the
provision, installation and maintenance of the
monitoring equipment. He shall ensure that sufficient noise monitoring
equipment and associated instrumentation are available for carrying out the
baseline monitoring, regular impact monitoring and ad hoc monitoring. All the
equipment and associated instrumentation shall be clearly labelled. Noise
measurements should not be made in the presence of fog, rain, wind with a
steady speed exceeding 5m/s or wind with gusts exceeding 10m/s. The wind speed
shall be checked with a portable wind speed meter capable of measuring the wind
speed in m/s.
The ET shall
carry out noise monitoring during the construction and operational phases at 3
monitoring stations as shown in Table 4.1 and Figure
4.1. The status and locations of NSRs may change after issuing this Updated
EM&A Manual. In such cases, the ET Leader should propose updated monitoring
locations and seek approval from ER and agreement from the IEC and EPD of the proposal.
Table 4.1
Noise monitoring locations
Monitoring ID |
Location |
Type of Monitoring |
Monitoring Parameters |
Supplementary Information |
NM1a |
Wo Keng Shan Tsuen |
Construction & Operation |
LAeq, 30mins |
LA10 and LA90 |
NM2a |
Ling Ma Hang |
Construction & Operation |
LAeq, 30mins |
LA10 and LA90 |
NM3 |
Cheung Shan
Monastery |
Traffic Noise (Operation) |
LA10, 1hr |
LAeq and LA90 |
Notes: Due to the original monitoring
at NM1 and near to village houses at Wo Keng Shan Tsuen was not granted by
villagers and limited access to the original monitoring locations at NM2, the
original station NM1 and NM2 are proposed to change to NM1a and NM2a respectively,
which are close to major site activities and are considered as the accessible
location closest to Wo Keng Shan Tsuen and Lin Ma Hang respectively, and as
agreed with IEC. Detailed location please refer to (Figure 4.1).
When alternative monitoring
locations are proposed, the monitoring locations should be chosen based on the
following criteria:
At locations close to the major
site activities which are likely to have noise impacts;
Close to the noise sensitive receivers;
For monitoring locations in the
vicinity of the sensitive receivers, care should be taken to avoid disturbance
to the occupants during monitoring.
The monitoring station shall
normally be at a point 1m from the exterior of the sensitive receivers building
facade and be at a position 1.2m above the ground. If there is problem with
access to the normal monitoring position, an alternative position may be
chosen, and a correction to the measurements shall be made. For reference, a
correction of +3dB(A) shall be made to the free field measurements. The ET
Leader shall agree with the IEC on the monitoring positions and the corrections
adopted. Once the positions for the monitoring stations are chosen, the
baseline monitoring and the impact monitoring shall be carried out at the same
positions.
The ET shall
carry out baseline noise monitoring prior to the commencement of the construction
of landfill. The continuous baseline monitoring shall be carried out daily for
a period of at least two weeks in a sample period of 5 minutes or 30 minutes. A
schedule on the baseline monitoring shall be submitted to the IEC for approval
before the monitoring starts.
In exceptional
case, when insufficient baseline monitoring data or questionable results are
obtained, the ET Leader shall liaise with the IEC and EPD to agree on an
appropriate set of data to be used as a baseline reference and submit to ER for
approval.
During normal construction
working hour (0700-1900 Monday to Saturday), monitoring of Leq30min
noise levels (as 6 consecutive Leq5min readings) shall be carried
out at the agreed monitoring locations once every week.
If a school exists near the
construction activity, noise monitoring shall be carried out at the monitoring
stations for the schools during the school examination periods. The ET Leader
shall liaise with the schools personnel and the Examination Authority to
ascertain the exact dates and times of all examination periods during the course of the contract.
In case of non-compliance
with the construction noise criteria, more frequent monitoring as specified in
the Event and Action Plan shall be carried out. This additional monitoring
shall be continued until the recorded noise levels are rectified or proved to
be irrelevant to the construction activities.
A schedule on the compliance
monitoring shall be submitted to the IEC for approval before the monitoring
starts. Sample monitoring sheet for construction noise measurements is given in
Appendix E.
During normal
operational working hours, monitoring of LAeq,30min noise levels (as
six consecutive LAeq, 5min
readings) shall be carried out at the agreed monitoring locations once every
week in accordance with the methodology in the TM.
Other noise
sources such as road traffic and construction activities may make a significant
contribution to the overall noise environment. Therefore, the results of noise
monitoring activities shall take into account such
influencing factors, which may not be present during the baseline monitoring
period.
In case of
non-compliance with the operational noise criteria, more frequent monitoring as
specified in the Event and Action Plan shall be carried out. This additional
monitoring shall be continued until the recorded noise levels are rectified or
proved to be irrelevant to the operational activities.
Traffic Noise
monitoring for the purpose of assessing the accuracy of traffic noise predictions
by comparing the project noise impact predictions with the actual impacts. Traffic noise monitoring shall be
carried out at the agreed traffic noise monitoring stations. The traffic noise levels shall be measured twice at 6-month
intervals within the first year upon completion of the Project. The two sets of
monitoring data shall be obtained within the first year of operation. One set
of measurements at the morning traffic peak hour on normal weekdays. One set of
measurement at the evening traffic peak hour on normal weekdays. The traffic
noise shall be measured in terms of the A-weighted L10 (1 hour) over 3 half
hours periods. As supplementary
information for data auditing, statistical results such as Leq,
L90 and Lmax shall also be obtained for reference.
Measured noise levels shall be compared with the predicted
noise levels by applying appropriate conversion corrections to allow for the
traffic conditions at the time of measurement. For the traffic noise, the
measured/monitored noise levels shall be compared with the predicted results
and the predicted traffic flow conditions (calculated noise levels based on
concurrent traffic census obtained). In
case discrepancies are observed, explanation shall be given to justify the
discrepancies.
The Action and
Limit levels for construction, operational and traffic noise are defined in Tables
4.2 - 4.3. Should non-compliance of the criteria occur, actions in
accordance with the Event and Action Plan in Tables 4.5 - 4.6 shall be
carried out.
Table 4.2 Action and
limit levels for construction noise
Time Period |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
0700 - 1900 hours on normal weekdays |
When one documented complaint is
received |
75dB(A)* |
If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the
conditions stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the Noise
Control Authority have to be followed.
*Reduce to 70dB(A) for schools and 65dB(A) during school
examination periods.
Table 4.3 Action and
limit levels for operational noise
Time
Period |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
0700-1900
on all days |
When
one documented complaint
is received |
60dB(A)* |
1900-2300
on all days |
60dB(A)* |
|
2300-0700
on all days |
50dB(A)* |
* Only apply to operational noise without road traffic and
construction activities noise.
Table
4.5 Event and action plan for construction noise monitoring
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Action Level |
Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance
Prepare Notification of Exceedance
Inform IEC and Contractor
Report the results of investigation to IEC, and Contractor
Discuss with Contractor and IEC for formulate remedial measures
Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented
Have additional monitoring if exceedance is due to the Project. If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
Verify the Notification of Exceedance
Review the analysed results submitted by ET Discuss with ET, and
Contractor on the potential remedial actions
Review the proposed remedial measures
Supervise the implementation of remedial measures |
Submit noise mitigation proposals to IEC
Implement the agreed noise mitigation proposals |
Exceedance
of Limit
Level |
Identify
source, investigate the causes of exceedance
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance
Inform IEC and
Contractor
Repeat
measurements to confirm findings
Discuss with
Contractor and IEC for remedial measures
Ensure remedial
measures are properly implemented
Assess
effectiveness of Contractors remedial actions and keep IEC and EPD informed
of the results
Have additional
monitoring if exceedance is due to the Project. If exceedance stops, cease
additional monitoring |
Verify the
Notification of Exceedance
Review the
analysed results submitted by ET Discuss with
ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions Review the proposed remedial measures
Supervise the implementation of
remedial measures |
Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance
Submit proposals for remedial actions
to IEC of notification
Implement the agreed proposals Resubmit
proposals if problem still not under control
Stop the relevant portion of works as
determined by project proponent until the exceedance is abated. |
Table
4.6 Event and action plan for operational noise monitoring
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Exceedance of Action Level |
Identify source, investigate the causes of exceedance
Prepare Notification of Exceedance
Inform IEC and Contractor
Report the results of investigation to IEC, and Contractor
Discuss with Contractor and IEC for formulate remedial measures
Ensure remedial measures are properly implemented
Have additional monitoring if exceedance is due to the Project. If
exceedance stops, cease additional monitoring |
Verify the Notification of Exceedance
Review the analysed results submitted by ET Discuss with ET, and
Contractor on the potential remedial actions
Review the proposed remedial measures
Supervise the implementation of remedial measures |
Submit noise mitigation proposals to IEC
Implement the agreed noise mitigation proposals |
Exceedance
of Limit
Level |
Identify
source, investigate the causes of exceedance
Prepare
Notification of Exceedance
Inform IEC and
Contractor
Repeat
measurements to confirm findings
Discuss with
Contractor and IEC for remedial measures
Ensure remedial
measures are properly implemented
Assess
effectiveness of Contractors remedial actions and keep IEC and EPD informed
of the results
Have additional
monitoring if exceedance is due to the Project. If exceedance stops, cease
additional monitoring |
Verify the
Notification of Exceedance
Review the
analysed results submitted by ET Discuss with
ET, and Contractor on the potential remedial actions Review the proposed remedial measures
Supervise the implementation of
remedial measures |
Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance
Submit proposals for remedial actions
to IEC of notification
Implement the agreed proposals Resubmit
proposals if problem still not under control
Stop the relevant portion of works as
determined by project proponent until the exceedance is abated |
The Contractor
shall be responsible for implementation of the noise control and mitigation
measures during construction phase, which shall include, but not limited to,
the following:
Quiet equipment and
construction method should be employed;
Only well-maintained plant
shall be operated on site and plant shall be serviced regularly during the
construction work;
Machines and plant that may be
in intermittent use (such as breakers) shall be shut down between work periods
or should be throttled down to a minimum;
Mobile plant shall be sited as
far away from NSRs as possible;
Material stockpiles and other
structures shall be effectively utilised, where practicable, to screen noise
from on-site construction activities; and
Silencers or mufflers on
construction equipment should be properly fitted and maintained during the
construction works.
Potential water
pollution sources arising from construction activities include sources mainly
from land-based activities, such as construction site runoff; sewage effluent
due to workforce on site; accidental spillage of chemical; drainage diversion;
and groundwater seepage.
Potential water
pollution sources arising from operational include sources mainly from land-
based activities, such as seepage of leachate, accidental Leakage of leachate
and erosion.
The EIA Report
has assessed the water quality impacts caused by the construction and operation
of NENT Landfill Extension. Mitigation measures have been recommended in the
EIA to ensure compliance with the relevant legislative requirements. These
mitigation measures are summarised in following sections. An implementation
schedule of the recommended mitigation measures is presented in Appendix
C.
5.2.1
Construction Phase
5.2.1.1 Construction Site Runoff
In accordance with the Practice Note for
Professional Persons on Construction Site Drainage, Environmental Protection Department,
1994 (ProPECC PN 1/94), and DSD Technical Circular TC01/2017,
construction phase precautionary measures as presented in Appendix C shall be
implemented where necessary. By adopting the above precautionary measures with
Best Management Practices (BMPs) it is anticipated that the impacts of runoff
from the construction site will be reduced to satisfactory levels before
discharges.
The construction runoff discharged from the
landfill site shall fully comply with the standards stated in Section 5.2 of
the EIA report, otherwise the discharge shall be collected and conveyed to the
on-site leachate treatment plant.
5.2.1.2 Sewage from Workforce
Portable chemical toilets and sewage holding
tanks will be provided for handling the sewage generated by the workforce. A
licensed contractor will be employed to provide appropriate and adequate
portable toilets and be responsible for appropriate disposal and maintenance.
5.2.1.3 Accidental Spillage of Chemical
Any service workshops and maintenance
facilities will be located within a bunding area, and sumps and oil
interceptors will be provided.
Maintenance of equipment involving activities with potential for leakage
and spillage will only be undertaken within the areas appropriately equipped to
control these discharges.
5.2.2
Operational Phase
5.2.2.1 Contingency Plan on Accidental Leakage
of Leachate
Existing
Contingency Plan for Groundwater Contamination
The existing Contingency Plan is
comprehensive and well-developed and will be used as basis for developing the
Contingency Plan for the extension site. The parameters to be monitored include
groundwater level and groundwater quality. The objective of the monitoring
programme is to ensure that the trigger levels below are not exceeded.
Ammonia Nitrogen: 5 mg/L
COD: 30
mg/L
In the event that the above trigger levels are
exceeded, the Contractor will implement a Corrective Action Programme, which
shall include:
groundwater interception and
diversion; and
groundwater extraction (by
active pumping of leachate from leachate and groundwater collection layers) and
treatment prior to discharge.
Proposed Modifications to
Contingency Plan for Groundwater Contamination
Potential
actions to be taken in case of identification of groundwater contamination
should also include:
Installation of additional groundwater
monitoring well;
Increased frequency of
groundwater quality testing;
Installation of ground-water
extraction wells to remove contaminated groundwater for treatment;
Installation of subsurface
barriers, such as bentonite;
Detailed investigation of the
potential impact to be performed within six months of the first detection of
the justified impact.
Contingency Plan for Surface Water
Contamination
Surface water
monitoring will be conducted to keep the ammonia-nitrogen and COD below the
following trigger levels:
Ammonia
Nitrogen: 0.5 mg/L
COD: 30 mg/L
Suspended
Solid: 20 mg/L
In the event that any one of the
above parameters was exceeded, the landfill operation should implement a
Corrective Action Programme. The key elements shall include:
Surface water interception and
temporary storage of the contaminated surface water;
Installation of surface
barriers, such as sand bund along the surface water channel / site boundary to
avoid overflow off-site;
Active pumping of the
contaminated surface water to the leachate lagoons / leachate recirculation
system / on-site leachate treatment plant;
Additional monitoring locations
will be selected to determine the pollution source;
Installation of surface
barriers, such as intercepting bund to separate the active and inactive tipping
area;
Change of working methods to
prevent surface water contamination; and
Implementation of diversionary
works.
5.2.2.2 Erosion
Control
The Contractor
shall devise a soil erosion control plan during the detailed design stage so as to define the site-specific measures and procedures
(including the specific operation plan, implementation frequency, monitoring
procedures, maintenance schedules, etc). Such requirement shall be specified in
contract documents. Appendix
C summarizes the most popular erosion control methods for reference.
5.2.2.3 Surface Water Drainage System
A temporary
surface water drainage system to manage runoff will be adopted during
construction and operation. It consists of perimeter channels around the site
perimeter. It will collect surface water from higher elevations to lower
elevations and ultimately to the discharge point, Details of surface water
drainage system are included in Appendix
C.
The surface
flow discharge from the landfill site shall fully comply with the standards
stated in Section 5.2 of the EIA report, otherwise the contaminated surface
flow shall be collected and disposed of to the on-site leachate treatment
plant.
The Contractor
shall develop and operate a programme of monitoring which shall record the
progressive generation of leachate at the NENT Landfill Extension in accordance
with the following objectives:
To determine the level of
leachate within the landfill;
To determine the quality of
leachate arising from the landfill;
To determine the quantity of
leachate arising from the landfill and being treated;
To monitor the quantity and
quality of treated leachate from the leachate treatment works before
discharging into leachate pipeline connecting to Shek
Wu Hui Sewage Treatment Plant; and
To ascertain the landfill
characteristics and effectiveness of the leachate treatment works.
The leachate
monitoring programme shall commence at the start of landfill operations and
continue until the issue of the Aftercare Certificate. The programme shall be
developed with in-built flexibility to allow for modification during the
development of the leachate treatment works and any modifications to the
monitoring of the quality and quantity of leachate generated.
5.3.1
Equipment
Routine
sampling and on-site measurements of leachate quality shall be carried out with
appropriate equipment which include:
Portable thermometer, pH and electrical conductivity (EC) meter
Sample bottle of glass or PET
of volume not less than 1 litre
Flowmeters
At the leachate
collection point, the submersible pump shall be used to discharge leachate flow
from the leachate removal chamber. Level sensors shall be incorporated into the
side slope riser pipe for pump control and measurement of leachate level. In
addition, a dipstick and measuring tape shall be used to determine (in-situ)
normal leachate levels if the level sensor is not operative.
5.3.2
Calibration and
Maintenance
The Contractor
shall ensure that all equipment are calibrated and
maintained according to manufacturers instructions. Routine maintenance shall
be carried out in strict accordance with the manufacturers requirements. Where
calibration intervals are not specified by the equipment manufacturer, the
length of time between calibration periods shall not be greater than 6 months.
An inspection
procedure shall be established to ensure that the frequency of maintenance is
regularised for each equipment. Results from the monitoring programme shall be
used to assist in the ongoing operation of the leachate treatment works to
ensure that the facility is being operated under the optimum conditions, and
that the leachate discharge complies with the trigger levels specified in
Section 5.3.8.
5.3.3
Procedures
The Contractor
shall monitor leachate levels within the landfill using calibrated submersible
level sensors incorporated into the side slope riser pipe.
Quantity of raw
leachate shall be monitored using in-line flow meters installed in the pipe.
The flow meters shall be designed and constructed to determine the volume and
rate of leachate leaving the landfill site to an accuracy and precision of
within +/- 1%.
At the same
locations, the leachate shall also be monitored periodically to assess leachate
quality produced within operational areas and after treatment. This shall be
achieved using in-line sampling valves/taps. The design and construction of
these valves/taps shall be such that samples of leachate of between 1 and 25
litres can be readily and easily obtained without sampling rates being too high
resulting in unacceptably-high levels of splashing or
too low making the duration of sampling unacceptably long.
The Contractor
shall use the groundwater drainage layer to detect any leachate escaping
through the liner system. The detection system shall involve daily sampling at
the groundwater discharge point (shown as Leachate Leakage Detector) and the
groundwater monitoring boreholes.
All leachate
samples shall be collected and transported to a HOKLAS accredited laboratory as
soon after sampling as possible.
Appropriate pre-treatment of samples shall be prepared in respect of the
analytical parameters, with due regard to its holding times.
Leachate
quality shall be monitored as a feedback to the
operation for optimisation of the leachate treatment works and to establish its
trend over the life of the landfill. The programmes shall generate data to
support the establishment of a procedure for the necessary treatment and safe
disposal of effluent from NENT Landfill Extension.
The following
parameters shall be measured in accordance with the standards contained within
the Specification:
Table 5.1 Suite 1 - Leachate Monitoring
Programme A |
Programme B |
||||
Parameters |
Detection Limits |
Frequency |
Parameters |
Detection Limits |
Frequency |
Temperature* |
0.1°C |
Weekly basis initially and then monthly
when settled values are obtained for the first 3 years of NENT Landfill Extension
operation |
Mg |
50 μg/L |
Monthly basis initially and then 3
monthly Intervals when settled values obtained for the first 3 years of NENT
Landfill Extension operation |
pH* |
0.1 |
Ca |
50 μg/L |
||
Electrical conductivity* |
1 μS/cm |
K |
50 μg/L |
||
COD |
10 mg/L |
Fe |
50 μg/L |
||
BOD5 |
3 mg/L |
Ni |
1 μg/L |
||
TOC |
1 mg/L |
Zn |
10 μg/L |
||
SS |
0.1 mg/L |
Mn |
1 μg/L |
||
Ammonia-nitrogen |
0.2 mg/L |
Cu |
1 μg/L |
||
Nitrate |
0.5 mg/L |
Pb |
1 μg/L |
||
Nitrite |
0.5 mg/L |
Cd |
0.2 μg/L |
||
Total Nitrogen |
0.4 mg/L |
||||
Sulphate |
5 mg/L |
||||
Phosphate |
0.01 mg/L |
||||
Chloride |
0.5 mg/L |
||||
Sodium |
50 μg/L |
||||
Alkalinity |
1 mg/L |
||||
Volatile fatty Acids |
2 mg/L |
* On-site measurement
Table 5.2 Suite 2 - Leachate Monitoring
Parameters |
Detection Limits |
Parameters |
Detection Limits |
Frequency |
Temperature* |
0.1°C |
Phosphate |
0.01 mg/L |
Quarterly Basis after the first 3 years of NENT Landfill
Extension operation |
pH* |
0.1 |
Chloride |
0.5
mg/L |
|
COD |
10 mg/L |
Sodium |
50 μg/L |
|
BOD5 |
3
mg/L |
Alkalinity |
1
mg/L |
|
SS |
0.1 mg/L |
Fe |
50 μg/L |
|
Ammonia-nitrogen |
0.2
mg/L |
Zn |
10
μg/L |
|
Nitrate |
0.5 mg/L |
Cu |
1 μg/L |
|
Total
Nitrogen |
0.4
mg/L |
Cd |
0.2
μg/L |
|
Sulphate |
5 mg/L |
|
|
* On-site measurement
Suite 1
(Programme A and Programme B) shall be used to establish the quality of
leachate from each collection point (i.e., before and after treatment) for the
first 3 years of NENT Landfill Extension operation, and Suite 2 shall be used
for routine monitoring thereafter.
For leachate
leakage detection, the Contractor shall analyse the samples taken at the
groundwater discharge point for ammonia-nitrogen, pH
and conductivity. If necessary, COD shall be tested when high ammonia-nitrogen
is detected at the groundwater discharge point. Samples shall be stored and
preserved according to the guidelines of the approved accredited laboratory.
5.3.5
Frequency and Locations
of Sampling
The Contractor
shall take raw leachate samples and treated leachate samples. The frequency and
sampling locations summarized in Table 5.3.
Table 5.3 Frequency and Locations of
Sampling
Program |
Frequency |
Location |
Suite 1,
Programme A |
Weekly
intervals initially and then monthly when settled values are obtained for the
first three years of NENT Landfill Extension operation |
At new
leachate Collection Points (i.e prior to
discharging points at raw leachate lagoon for raw leachate monitoring and
final effluent holding lagoon for partially treated leachate monitoring) |
Suite 1, Programme B |
At monthly intervals and then three-monthly intervals when
settled values are obtained for the first three years of NENT Landfill
Extension operation |
|
Suite 2 |
At quarterly
intervals after Suite 1 programme B |
The Contractor shall monitor levels
of leachate continuously using calibrated submersible pressure transducers via
data retrieving equipment. Daily records of leachate production shall be
maintained via data logging flow meters for all abstraction of liquid from the
site and leachate quantities leaving the site.
The Contractor shall determine the
locations of leachate monitoring points and submit the proposed plan to the IEC
for approval.
5.3.6
ResuIts
All sample containers
shall be clearly marked, and identified with relevant
sampling information. In addition, all monitoring results and observations made
at time of sampling shall be recorded in a field data sheet specifically
allocated to that sampling task. The following
information shall be recorded on each sampling visit:
Sampling point;
Data and time of sample collection;
Name of technician carrying out
the sampling;
Weather conditions and ambient temperature;
General appearance, condition
and temperature of the water body;
Sampling device and method used;
Sample preservation used;
Storage requirements adopted;
and
Space for listing analytical
determinations.
5.3.7
Leachate Leakage
Detection
Facilities to
detect leakage within a 24-hr period shall be placed in the manner and
positions specified and be monitored daily for the presence of leachate or
contaminated water.
5.3.8
Trigger Levels
The Contractor
shall operate a programme of monitoring with the following objectives:
Determine the level of leachate
within the landfill;
Determine the quality of
leachate from the landfill; and
Determine the quantity of
leachate from the landfill.
The Contractor
shall monitor the levels of leachate continuously at the leachate collection
point through the use of calibrated submersible level
sensors via data retrieving equipment. The level of leachate at any point
within the landfill shall not exceed 1m height above the top of the primary
barrier of the landfill liner system.
Treated
leachate shall be discharged to the leachate pipeline leading to the Shek Wu Hui Sewage Treatment Works (SWHSTW). The Contractor
is required to apply for a discharge license for discharge of treated leachate into
public sewer under the Water Pollution Control Ordinance (WPCO). The discharge
license will state the discharge limits for the key parameters. The Contractor
is required to ensure the quality of the treated effluent complies with the
limits stipulated in the discharge license. And the EM&A Manual will be
further updated with discharge limits for key parameters once the discharge
license under WPCO is obtained.
5.3.9
Corrective Action
If the trigger
levels in Section 5.3.8 are exceeded, the Contractor shall implement a
Corrective Action Programme, which shall include:
Leachate extraction;
Phased development and closure
to minimise the active area footprint;
Temporary geosynthetic covers
to minimize infiltration in active cells;
Run-on and runoff control
systems for active and closed areas;
Low permeability final cover
system to minimise infiltration during post-closure;
In event that
the Contractor detects leachate leakage (i.e. the
trigger level is exceeded at the groundwater discharge point), the liquid shall
be treated at the leachate treatment plant prior to discharge to the leachate
pipeline leading to SWHSTW.
Groundwater Level
5.4.1
Introduction
Groundwater levels shall be
monitored over the working life of the site to determine the following
information:
Natural seasonal variation in
groundwater levels;
Effects of any ground water abstraction;
Identification of hydraulic
gradients; and
Variation caused by the
construction, operation or aftercare.
5.4.2
Equipment
A portable dip meter, not
affected by condensation, shall be used to measure water depth
and checked before use. The dip meter shall comprise a graduated tape and sonic
indicator of water level.
5.4.3
Procedures
Water level measurements
shall be carried out prior to any purging or sampling from monitoring holes.
The Contractor shall take
groundwater level measurements relative to a permanent fixed datum at a
measured elevation at each location, situated and marked on the monitoring
borehole casing or cover. Recorded levels shall be expressed as metres relative
to Principal Datum, and the levels checked 3 times prior to recording the
measurements.
5.4.4
Frequency and Locations
of Sampling
All manual groundwater
level measurements shall be carried out at least once a month.
In the
event that automatic measuring equipment is
installed, the associated data loggers shall be interrogated / downloaded at
least on a monthly basis. The automatic monitoring equipment shall be
calibrated monthly and periodic manual water level measurements shall be carried
out to corroborate the measurements.
Monthly groundwater
monitoring shall be carried out at specified points ED1-ED35 in accordance with
Figure 5.1 unless otherwise approved by the IEC.
5.4.5
Results
All manual water level
measurements shall be recorded relative to both monitoring borehole datum and
Principal Datum. All automatic monitoring equipment shall be in a form that can
be input to computer and displayed in numerical or graphical form. Results
shall include site name; unique monitoring borehole reference or location code;
date and water level in metres below monitoring borehole datum and to Principal
Datum.
Groundwater Quality
5.4.6
Equipment
The criteria for selection
of appropriate equipment shall depend upon the purpose of the sampling exercise,
the site characterisation and the parameters that are to be analysed. This
shall be assessed using the following criteria:
Required sampling accuracy and precision;
Sampling frequency;
Sampler construction material;
Required head;
Required discharge rate; and
Reliability and ease of
maintenance, including availability of spared.
Teflon and/or stainless steel samplers (e.g. bailers) shall be
used to sample groundwater.
Where sampling relies on
the sample being pumped to the surface via tubing, the tubing used shall be
Teflon, Teflon lined, or polypropylene. Bladder pumps shall be used to purge
and to sample. Groundwater may be pumped from depths in
excess of 50m below ground level, due to the depth to groundwater and
the topographic level of the site.
5.4.7
Calibration and
maintenance
Before each purging
process, field meters shall be calibrated according to manufacturer
specifications and the calibration results recorded in a calibration log file.
All sampling equipment shall be thoroughly decontaminated as per standard
sampling protocol prior to use.
5.4.8
Procedures
The Contractor shall purge
a monitoring borehole before a sample is taken in order that representative
groundwater is sampled. This process shall be combined with field monitoring of
determinants such as electrical conductivity, pH and
temperature, so that stable sampling conditions can be achieved. If the water
is contaminated it shall be contained and treated as leachate, otherwise
abstracted groundwater shall be discharged to the surface water drainage
system.
Samples shall be stored and
preserved according to the guideline of approved accredited laboratory.
Representative groundwater sample shall be collected, in approved receptacles
as follows:
Sampling containers shall be
pre-rinsed with the water being collected, except in the case where specific
determinations require preservatives in pre-prepared bottles;
Glass containers shall be used
for receipt of samples for organic analysis;
Polyethylene containers shall
be used for other determinants, except trace metals determinants such as mercury;
Water shall be poured into
sampling bottles carefully until filled completely, unless a specific volume in
required by the analytical laboratory;
A minimum of one litre sample
shall be taken, unless otherwise specified;
On-site measurement of EC, pH
and temperature shall be carried out;
On completion of sampling,
portable equipment shall be removed from the borehole, and cleaned prior to use
at next installation.
All sample bottles shall be
labelled, samples shall be kept at four degrees centigrade and sent to the
laboratory within specified holding times for the analytical methods. Samples
shall be sent to the laboratory with appropriate chain-of-custody
documentation.
Analysis of samples shall
be carried out in accordance with methods described in American Society for
Testing and Material (ASTM) or American Public Health Association (APHA)
American Water Works Association (AWWA) - Water Environment Federation (WEF).
5.4.9
Results
All sample containers shall
be clearly marked to show the site name, location and
date of sample collection. All results shall be presented as following:
Site name;
Unique sampling location reference;
Time and date of the sampling;
Name of the sampling technician;
Weather conditions and air temperature;
Appearance, condition and
temperature of the water body;
Sampling device used;
On-site measurements of EC, pH
and temperature;
Volume of water purged prior to
sampling; and
Physical description of the
sample.
5.4.10
Analysis Parameters
The Contractor shall
measure the parameters according to the Table 5.4 in monthly basis. In
the event of contamination being detected in the monthly monitoring programme,
additional groundwater monitoring shall be carried out in weekly basis.
Table 5.4 Groundwater
Monitoring
Parameters |
Detection Limit |
Normal Frequency |
Additional Frequency |
Temperature* |
0.1°C |
Monthly
basis |
- |
pH* |
0.1 |
Monthly basis |
Weekly Basis |
Electrical conductivity* |
1
mS/cm |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
Basis |
COD |
10 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
Weekly Basis |
BOD |
3
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
Basis |
SS |
0.1 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
Weekly Basis |
Ammonia-nitrogen |
0.2
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
Basis |
Nitrate |
0.5 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
TKN |
0 4
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Sulphate |
5 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
Sulphite |
2
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Phosphate |
0.01 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
Chloride |
0.5
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
Basis |
Iron |
50 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
Weekly Basis |
Zinc |
10
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
Basis |
Coliform
Count |
1 cfu/
100mL |
Monthly basis |
Weekly Basis |
*On-site measurement
5.4.11
Trigger Levels
The Contractor shall
propose a permanent monitoring network at the site to include the following:
Detailed information on the
hydrogeological regime;
Details on seasonal groundwater
level fluctuations and short-term variations in certain areas;
Detailed baseline groundwater
quality information; and
Detailed pumping test data for
areas down gradient of the site where contaminants are likely to migrate.
The Contractor shall
monitor groundwater around the site to ensure that the trigger levels are not
exceeded Table 5.7
5.4.12
Corrective Action
In the
event that the above trigger levels are
exceeded, the Contractor shall implement a Corrective Action Programme, which
shall include:
Groundwater extraction and, if necessary, treatment prior to
discharge; and
Groundwater interception and diversion.
5.5.1
Introduction
The Contractor
shall carry out surface water monitoring from the commencement of the works
until the issue of the Aftercare Certificate in accordance with the following
objectives:
To assess the performance of
the registered design, where surface water leaves the site and/or the landfill
boundary; surface water leaves an operational area; and surface water leaves
areas of potential contamination e.g. waste reception
area, vehicle and wheel washing, haul route, vehicle servicing, etc.
To ensure no long-term
deterioration in surface water quality adjacent to the site;
To provide data for the design
and to monitor the effectiveness of any remedial measures which may be
necessary in the event of excessive leachate migration or liner failure.
Surface water
monitoring stations shall be established in and around the site as part of the
monitoring programme.
5.5.2
Equipment
For monitoring
surface water quality, the Contractor shall use the following sampling and
measuring equipment:
Varying water sample
containers, as appropriate to the type of analysis being determined, fabricated
from polyethylene, polypropylene, polycarbonate, aluminium, stainless steel or glass
-Glass
containers for organic constituents, but where major constituents of glass are
to be analysed (e.g. sodium, potassium, boron, silicon
and trace metallic impurities) glass containers shall not be used.
-Polyethylene
containers shall not be used for trace metallic impurities such as mercury.
Silicon sieve/disposable
filters for removal of suspended solids
Thermometer with a range of
0-50°C
Digital pH meter
Electrical conductivity meter
A clamp, pole
or string shall be attached to the bottle if the water poses a threat to the
sampling technician or if direct contact is likely to be made with skin. In all
situations, gloves shall be worn as a matter of routine when sampling
potentially- contaminated water.
The following
equipment or the which equivalents approved by IEC shall be provided for
monitoring flow:
IS32 flow monitor complete with
Druck transducer capable of measuring parameters of
depth and velocity at specified intervals, with trip mode built-in.
Velocity calibrator Montec 3013 portable Doppler measurement for in-situ
calibrations of velocity. A 1.25m logging wand shall be used for recording
in-situ measurements.
Monitoring software
specifically designed for use with IS32 and Montec
3013, to produce depth, velocity and discharge graphs,
as well as tabulated data.
5.5.3
Calibration and
Maintenance
Clean,
pre-conditioned/washed sample containers shall be used during the sampling
programme. Sample containers shall be used only once with the
exception of glass containers appropriately decontaminated at the
analytical laboratory prior to use. All sampling equipment including
open-mouthed collection vessels (buckets and cans) and sieves shall be
decontaminated prior to use between sample points to prevent cross
contamination. Decontamination procedures involve the use of laboratory grade
detergent and rinsing in de-ionized water. Sample bottles that contain chemical
preservatives shall not be rinsed or cleansed in any way.
Thermometers
shall be rinsed with de-ionized water and then wiped with disposable towels
immediately after use before being replaced in the carrying case.
All flow
measuring equipment shall be calibrated according to the manufacturers
specifications.
5.5.4
Procedures
The Contractor
shall undertake sampling of surface water quality with reference to the
following documents:
The
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ISO5667-1:2020 Water
Quality - Sampling - Part 1: Guidance on the design of sampling programmes and
sampling techniques
ISO
5667-3:2018 Water quality - Sampling - Part 3: Preservation and handling of
water samples
ISO 5667-6:2014 Water quality - Sampling
- Part 6: Guidance on sampling of rivers and streams
Before
sampling, the flow rate of the stream/river shall be determined and the water
and air temperature, pH and electrical conductivity shall be measured and
recorded.
All the
precautions outlined in the Specification for avoiding contamination during
sampling shall be taken, for example, pre-rinsing sampling containers
(excluding those containers which are preserved by certain type of chemicals)
with the surface water to be collected. In addition, appropriate health and
safety precautions including the wearing of protective waterproof gloves shall
be followed.
In general,
samples shall be collected from within 500mm of the water surface. Samples
shall be collected within an open-mouthed vessel with the lip pointing
upstream. The sample shall be filtered as appropriate. Alternatively
the sample shall be collected directly into the sample container. Sampling of
the surface film layer shall be avoided during the sampling programme.
During sample
collection, care shall be taken so that air is not introduced into the samples
thereby altering the relative compositions of the determinants. Once the sample
bottle is filled to the top with no remaining air space the lid shall be
securely screwed on. Where samples are to be preserved with acid or alkalis
prior to transport to the laboratory, the sample bottles shall be filled to the
level specified by the analytical laboratory.
Samples shall
be transported to the laboratory for analysis as soon as possible after the sample
is collected, since the longevity of some of the sample determinants is
limited. All samples shall be stored at 4°C and transported to the laboratory
within 48 hours from sampling.
Analyses shall
be carried out in accordance with methods described in ASTM or APHA AWWA WEF
Standard.
If the site
condition is feasible, flow measurements shall also be taken continuously using
automatic logging equipment.
5.5.5
Analysis Parameters
The Contractor
shall measure the all parameters according to Table
5.5 in monthly basis. In the event of contamination being detected in the
monthly monitoring programme, additional surface water monitoring shall be
carried out in weekly basis.
Table
5.5 Surface Water Monitoring
Parameters |
Detection
Limit |
Normal
Frequency |
Additional
Frequency |
pH* |
0.1 |
Monthly basis |
Weekly basis |
Electrical
conductivity* |
1
mS/cm |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
basis |
Alkalinity |
1 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
COD |
10
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
basis |
BOD5 |
3 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
Weekly basis |
TOC |
1
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
basis |
SS |
0.1 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
Weekly basis |
Ammonia-nitrogen |
0.2
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
basis |
TKN |
0.4 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
Nitrate |
0.5
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Sulphate |
5 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
Sulphite |
2
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Phosphate |
0.01 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
Chloride |
0.5
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Sodium |
50 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
Mg |
50
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Ca |
50 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
K |
50
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Fe |
50 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
Weekly basis |
Ni |
1
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Zn |
10 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
Weekly basis |
Mn |
1
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Cu |
1 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
Pb |
1
mg/L |
Monthly
basis |
- |
Cd |
0.2 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
Coliform
Count |
1
cfu/ 100mL |
Monthly
basis |
Weekly
basis |
Oil and Grease |
5 mg/L |
Monthly basis |
- |
*On-site
measurement
If the site condition is feasible, surface
water flow shall be monitored continuously using automatic data logging
equipment. Following periods of heavy rainfall, flow shall be monitored weekly
and more frequently to determine peak discharge rates.
5.5.6
Locations of Sampling
Monthly surface
water monitoring shall be carried out at specified points WM1 (Upstream of Lin Ma Hang) and WM2 (Ping Yuen River,
i.e
existing SP1 monitoring
station) in accordance with Figure
5.2 unless otherwise approved by IEC.
The sampling points shall be readily accessible
and sampling shall be obtained from a flow that is moderate and steady.
Turbulent flowing streams or stagnant pools shall be avoided.
5.5.7
Results
Upon completion
of each sampling exercise, the sample containers shall be clearly labelled with
site name; sampling location reference; date and time of collection and sample
number.
In addition,
the sampling technician shall record any abnormality which may affect water
quality in their record notebooks. The sampling record shall include the
following details:
Sampling site and sampling point;
Date and time of collection;
Name of sampling technician;
Weather conditions and air temperature;
Appearance, condition and
temperature of the water body;
Sampling method and sampling
device used;
Sample preservation; and
Storage requirements;
List of parameters (with space
for the analytical results).
5.5.8
Trigger Levels
The Contractor shall
conduct the surface water monitoring programme in order to
keep ammonia-nitrogen and COD below the following trigger levels in operational
phase:
Ammonia-nitrogen: 0.5mg/L
COD: 30mg/L
In addition,
suspended solids concentrations for surface waters leaving the site shall not
exceed 20mg/L.
5.5.9
Corrective Action
In the event that these trigger
levels are exceeded, the Contractor shall implement a Corrective Action
Programme, which shall include:
Sampling upstream into landfill to trace the
source;
Surface water interception and treatment
prior to discharge;
Changes to working methods to prevent
surface water contamination;
Diversionary works.
Where
analytical results indicate the presence of contamination, additional
monitoring locations shall be selected to determine the pollution source. The Contractor
shall implement procedures in accordance with the corrective action plan to
mitigate any contamination sources identified.
The Action and Limit levels for
surface and ground water quality are defined in Table 5.6 and Table
5.7. Should non-compliance of the criteria occur, action in accordance with
the Action Plan in Table 5.8 shall be carried out.
Table
5.6 Action and Limit Levels for Surface Water Quality
|
Parameter |
Action |
Limit |
Construction |
DO in mg L-1 |
5 percentile of baseline data |
4 mg L-1 or 1%-ile of
baseline data |
pH |
95 percentile
of baseline data |
99 percentile of baseline |
|
Turbidity in NTU |
95 percentile of baseline data |
99 percentile
of baseline |
|
SS in mg L-1 |
95 percentile
of baseline data |
99 percentile of baseline |
|
Operation |
COD, Ammonia-nitrogen |
-- |
Ammonia-nitrogen:
0.5mg/L COD: 30mg/L |
SS in mgL-1 |
-- |
20mg/L |
Notes:
1.
For DO, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs
when monitoring result is lower than the limits.
2.
For turbidity, SS, non-compliance of the water quality limits
occurs when monitoring result is higher than the limits.
3.
For pH, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs
when monitoring result is outside the specified range.
4.
All the figures given in the table are used for reference
only and the EPD may amend the figures whenever it is considered as necessary.
Table 5.7 Action and Limit
Levels for Ground Water Quality
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
Remark |
COD, Ammonia-nitrogen |
--- |
COD: 30 mg/L Ammonia-nitrogen: 5mg/L |
For COD, Ammonia-nitrogen, non-compliance of the
water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is higher than the limits. |
Table 5.8 Event and Action Plan for Water Quality
Event |
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Action level
being exceeded by one sampling day |
Repeat in situ measurement to confirm findings
Identify source(s) of impact
Prepare Notification of Exceedance
Inform IEC and Contractor
Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractors working methods Repeat measurement on next day of
exceedance |
Verify Notification of Exceedance Check monitoring data and Contractors working methods |
Rectify unacceptable practice Amend working methods if appropriate |
Action
level being exceeded by two or more consecutive sampling days |
Repeat in situ measurement to confirm findings
Identify source(s) of impact Prepare Notification of Exceedance
Inform IEC and Contractor
Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractors working methods
Discuss with Contractor and IEC for
remedial measures
Ensure mitigation measures are implemented
Increase the monitoring frequency to
daily until no exceedance of Action level Repeat measurement on next day of exceedance |
Verify Notification of Exceedance Check
monitoring data and Contractor's working method Discuss
with ET and Contractor on possible remedial actions Review
the proposed mitigation measures Supervise
the implementation of mitigation measures |
Submit proposal of additional
mitigation measures to IEC of notification
Implement the agreed mitigation measures Amend
proposal if appropriate |
Limit Ievel being exceeded by one sampling day |
Repeat in situ measurement to confirm findings Identify source(s) of impact
Prepare Notification of Exceedance Inform IEC and Contractor Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's
working methods Discuss mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor Ensure mitigation measure are implemented |
Verify Notification of Exceedance Check monitoring data submitted By ET and Contractors working method Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial actions Review the proposed mitigation measures Supervise the implementation of mitigation measures |
Critically review the working method Rectify unacceptable practice Take immediate corrective actions to avoid further exceedance Submit proposal of mitigation measures to IEC Implement the agreed mitigation measures |
Limit
level being exceeded by two or more consecutive sampling days |
Repeat in situ measurement to confirm findings Identify
source(s) of impact Prepare Notification of Exceedance Inform
IEC, Contractor and EPD Check
monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working methods Discuss
mitigation measures with IEC and Contractor Ensure
mitigation measure are implemented |
Verify Notification of Exceedance
Check monitoring data submitted by ET
and Contractors working method
Discuss with ET and Contractor on
possible remedial actions
Review the proposed mitigation measures
Supervise the implementation of
mitigation measures |
Critically
review the working method
Rectify unacceptable practice Take
immediate corrective actions to avoid further exceedance Submit
proposal of mitigation measures to IEC Implement
the agreed mitigation measures Resubmit
proposals if problem still not under control
Slow down or to stop relevant activity
until exceedance is abated |
It will be the Contractors
responsibility to ensure that all wastes produced during the NENT Landfill
Extension are handled, stored and disposed of in
accordance with good waste management practices and EPDs regulations and
requirements.
The major waste
material generated during construction activities has been identified to be
construction and demolition (C&D) material and recommended to be audited at
regular intervals (at least weekly) to ensure that proper storage, transportation and disposal practices will be implemented.
Monitoring of
waste management practices will ensure that these solid wastes generated during
construction will not be disposed into the nearby coastal waters. The
Contractor will be responsible for the implementation of any mitigation
measures to minimise waste or redress problems arising from the waste
materials.
Construction
Phase
Mitigation measures for waste management are
summarised below. With the appropriate handling, storage
and removal of waste arisings during the construction phase as defined below,
the potential to cause adverse environmental impacts would be minimised. The
EMIS of the recommended mitigation measures is presented in Appendix C.
Good Site Practices and Waste Reduction
Measures
It is expected that adverse impacts from
waste management would not arise, provided that good site practices are
strictly followed. Recommendations for good site practices during construction
include:
Nomination of approved personnel
to be responsible for good site practices and making arrangements for
collection of all wastes generated on-site and effective disposal;
Training of site personnel for
cleanliness, proper waste management procedures including chemical waste
handling, and waste reduction, reuse and recycling concepts;
Provision of sufficient waste
collection points and regular collection for disposal;
Appropriate measures to minimise
windblown litter and dust during transportation of waste by either covering
trucks or by transporting wastes in enclosed containers;
Regular cleaning and maintenance
programme for drainage systems, sumps and oil interceptors;
Appropriate waste management
should be implemented in accordance with the ETWB TC(W) No. 19/2005; and
Recording system for the amount of wastes generated, recycled and disposed (including
the disposal sites) should be proposed.
A trip-ticket system should be implemented
in accordance with DEVB TCW No. 6/2010 for proper record of the quantity of
C&D material generated on-site. Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme
under the Waste Disposal Ordinance also applies to control the disposal of
construction waste. Good management and control will prevent the generation of
significant amounts of waste.
Waste reduction is best achieved at the
planning and design stage, as well as by ensuring the implementation of good
site practices. Recommendations include:
Segregation and storage of
different types of waste in different containers, skips or stockpiles to
enhance reuse or recycling of materials and their proper disposal;
Separate labelled bins should be
provided to segregate aluminium cans from other general refuse generated by the
work force and to encourage collection of aluminium cans by individual collector;
Any used chemicals or those with
remaining functional capacity should be recycled;
Maximising the use of reusable steel
formwork to reduce the amount of C&D materials;
Prior to disposal of C&D
waste, it is recommended that wood, steel and other
metals should be separated for re-use and/ or recycling to minimise amount of
waste generated and avoid unnecessary generation of wastes; and
Proper storage and site practices
should be implemented to minimise the potential for damage or contamination of
construction materials;
Plan and stock construction
materials carefully to minimise amount of waste generated and avoid unnecessary
generation of waste; and
Minimise excessive ordering of
concrete, mortars and cement grout by doing careful
check before ordering.
In addition, specific mitigation measures
are recommended below for the identified waste arisings to minimise
environmental impacts during handling, transportation
and disposal of these wastes.
C&D Material
As the design has adopted a C&D material
balance approach, the impact on the handling, collection, transportation
and disposal of C&D material is insignificant. Excavated slope, stockpiled
material and bund walls will be covered (e.g. by a
tarpaulin) until used in order to prevent wind-blown dust during dry weather,
and to reduce muddy runoff during wet weather. If any topsoil-like materials
need to be stockpiled for any length of time, consideration should be given to
hydroseeding of the topsoil on the stockpile to improve its visual appearance
and prevent soil erosion.
Chemical Wastes
Plant/equipment maintenance schedule should
be designed to optimise maintenance effectiveness and to minimise the
generation of chemical wastes. Chemical waste should be properly stored and
transported off-site for treatment by a licensed collector. The Contractor
should register with EPD as a chemical waste producer. Where possible, chemical
wastes (e.g. waste lube oil) should be recycled by
licensed treatment facilities.
General Refuse
All recyclable materials (separated from the
general waste) should be stored on-site in appropriate containers with cover
prior to collection by a local recycler for subsequent reuse and recycling.
Residual, non-recyclable, general waste should be stored in appropriate
containers to avoid odour. Regular collection should be arranged by an approved
waste collector in purpose-built vehicles that minimise environmental impacts
during transportation.
Sludge
Sludge should be collected by a licensed
collector at regular intervals, to suit the operation schedule of the leachate
treatment plant. The use of purpose-built sludge tankers can minimise the
potential of environmental impacts during transportation. Co-disposal of this
sludge in designated trenches should be considered to reduce its hazardous
impact.
The qualitative
risk assessment for landfill gas (LFG) hazards associated with the
construction, operation, restoration and aftercare
phases indicated that the overall risks to the receivers within the NENT
Landfill Extension site was categorised as 'High' and that to the receivers
outside the NENT Landfill Extension site was Medium.
The sensitive
receivers falling within the newly proposed 250m Consultation Zone may be prone
to LFG potential risk and appropriate protective and precautionary measures
including engineering design and monitoring programme have been proposed to
reduce such risk to acceptable levels. With these measures in place, no adverse
impact is anticipated. LFG monitoring should be conducted throughout various
phases of NENT Landfill Extension with the following key objectives:
To ensure the safety and health
of workers during the construction stage of landfill extension;
To determine the performance
and effectiveness of LFG mitigation measures and control systems for preventing
uncontrolled LFG migration, with respect to the LFG risk on properties,
residents and vegetation;
To establish a system for
assessment and monitoring of any potential ecological stress in the vicinities
of the site;
To establish a monitoring
regime for buildings within the site services routes and other enclosed areas
providing a warning system for detection of potential build-up of hazardous
LFG; and
To ascertain the
characteristics of the landfill and estimate the quantity and quality of the
LFG production in order to assess the potential for
future utilisation.
This Updated
EM&A Manual specifies the basic requirements for LFG monitoring in NENT
Landfill Extension, including the monitoring locations, parameters, equipment,
procedures, frequency, reporting format, Action and
Limit (A/L) Levels, Event and Action Plan (EAP), and Emergency and Contingency
Plan (ECP), etc. Further details of LFG monitoring requirements should be
established in the Landfill Monitoring Plan (LMP) to be developed by the Contractor
based on this Updated EM&A Manual.
The LFG
monitoring programme should include on-site and off-site monitoring at the
agreed period of time and frequency. On-site and
off-site LFG monitoring during different phases of landfill development should
cover:
Quantity and quality of
extracted LFG at individual gas well heads;
Quantity of LFG automatically
monitored at LFG pumping station;
Fixed surface and borehole
locations along the landfill site boundary and at potential sources of concern;
Monitoring safe level of LFG
concentration, and implementation of sufficient mitigation measures when
entering confined spaces within the landfill site; and
Off-site monitoring for LFG.
LFG monitoring
should be conducted in monthly basis at designated monitoring locations and gas
monitoring boreholes, supplemented by monthly site surveys of the surrounding
environment including natural cracks and fissures, service drains and ducts,
area with sign of vegetation death, and any below ground enclosed spaces, which
include normal bulk gas using portable instrument verified by gas sampling and
laboratory analyses. If the monitoring results indicate evidence of gas
migration, the monitoring frequency should be increased accordingly, with the
implementation of appropriate mitigation measures under the EAP.
LFG monitoring
should commence at the start of construction works through the operation,
restoration and until completion of aftercare phases. The measured LFG results
should be checked for compliance against pre-defined A/L Levels in this updated
EM&A Manual and the LMP. In case exceedance of compliance level was
detected at any locations, the EAP should be triggered for necessary action to
be taken.
If abnormally
high LFG levels are detected at off-site sensitive receivers, the ECP should be
strictly followed to timely trigger the listed action without delay, which
includes evacuation of occupants, provision of forced ventilation to the
concerned sensitive receiver, investigation of potential source of LFG,
increase LFG extraction rate on-site for minimise leakage etc. Details of the procedures
will be documented in the ECP.
A suite of LFG monitoring parameters
include:
Monitoring borehole: Methane (CH4). carbon dioxide (CO2),
oxygen (O2),
flammable gas
Surface gas location: CH4, CO2, O2
Gas well head: CH4, CO2, O2.
flammable gas, volatile organic compounds
(VOC)
Off-site location: VOC
Monitoring for Construction Works
Intrinsically safe portable
gas detectors should be used during excavation or when working in any confined
spaces, which have the potential for presence of LFG and risk of explosion or
asphyxiation. The monitoring equipment should alarm, both audibly and visually,
when the concentrations of the following gases were exceeded:
CH4: >10%
Lower Explosion Limit (LEL);
CO2: >0.5%;
and
O2: <18% by
volume.
Monitoring
at Designated Locations
Pre-entry and routine
monitoring should be conducted at boreholes, gas well heads, utilities
manholes and chambers throughout the landfill extension development. The LFG
monitoring should be conducted regularly. The LFG monitoring instrument should:
Comply with EPDs Landfill Gas
Hazard Assessment Guidance Note as intrinsically safe;
Be capable of continuous
monitoring of CH4. CO2, O2, barometric
pressure and gas pressure measurement;
Normally operate in diffusion
mode unless required for spot sampling, when it should be capable of operating
by means of an aspirator or pump;
Have low battery, fault and
over range indication incorporated;
Store monitoring date and be
capable of being down-loaded directly; and
Measure within these ranges:
methane 0-100% LEL & 0-100% v/v; oxygen 0-25% v/v; carbon dioxide 0-100%
v/v; barometric pressure mBar (absolute); gas
pressure (relative to atmosphere) pascals; and temperature 0-100°C.
Proper gas sampling devices
such as stainless steel gas cylinders or Tedlar bags should be used for collection of ambient gas
samples at specified surface and off-site locations and delivered to laboratory
for testing using gas chromatography analysis.
All buildings within the
NENT Landfill Extension site should be monitored for the presence of LFG with a
permeant detection system with the following features:
Detector heads to be located
within buildings;
Main control box which houses
individual control devices for each detector head;
Central control panel to alert
site personnel, audibly and visually, when gas concentration reached or
exceeded threshold levels; and
Dial-out facility to enable
appropriate personnel to be alerted if detectors are triggered outside
operation hours.
Calibration and
Maintenance
All portable instrument should be calibrated and serviced according to
the manufacturers instructions. Calibration gases should be used for checking
portable instrument for methane and carbon dioxide detection before and after
use. Instrument for monitoring oxygen should be calibrated against normal
expected air concentrations. Any significant variations in instrument
performance outside that expected through normal drift should be noted with the
instrument calibration timely corrected.
During the
construction works within the NENT Landfill Extension site with excavation of
1m deep or more, LFG concentrations should be monitored before entry and
periodically during the progress of works. If drilling is required, the
procedures for safety management and working procedures as stipulated in EPDs Landfill Gas Hazard Assessment - Guidance Note should
be strictly adopted.
Throughout the
landfill extension development, when service voids, manholes or inspection
chambers within the project site are entered for maintenance, monitoring and a
checklist system of safety requirements should be performed before entry in
accordance with the Code of Practice on Safety and Health at Work in Confined
Spaces.
The proposed
LFG monitoring locations including designated boreholes and surface locations,
gas wells, and off-site locations for NENT Landfill Extension development are
shown in Figure 5.1, which are subject to
changes depending on the design and modification by the Contractor. Detailed
requirements of LFG monitoring should be established in the LMP by the
Contractor.
LFG monitoring should be
conducted in monthly basis at designated monitoring locations and gas
monitoring boreholes, supplemented by monthly site surveys of the surrounding
environment including natural cracks and fissures, service drains and ducts,
area with sign of vegetation death, and any below ground enclosed spaces.
If the monitoring results
indicate evidence of gas migration, the monitoring frequency should be
increased accordingly, with the implementation of appropriate mitigation
measures under the EAP.
The monitoring frequency
should be reviewed throughout the on-going development of NENT Landfill
Extension and revised as necessary based on the air within the borehole monitoring
data. Detailed requirements of LFG monitoring frequency should be established
in the LMP by the Contractor.
Surface Gas
Emission
Walkover survey for the whole
site area should be undertaken at a slow pace with the inlet tube of the probe
only a few centimeters above ground level.
Measurements will be taken in
areas off-site and/or beyond the landfill boundary where there is visible
vegetation stress or die-back which may be caused by depletion of soil oxygen
and accumulation of toxic gases or vapors in the root
zone.
Survey of the capping, focusing
upon cracks or areas of settlement, surface drains, sub-surface service entries
to buildings and any other enclosed spaces should be taken.
Monitoring
Borehole
The sampling port should be
connected to the gas monitoring probe.
The gas analyser should be
turned on to sample the gas for about one minute.
The sampling port should be removed and the temperature probe should be inserted into
the gas monitoring probe to record the temperature.
Results should be recorded on a
log sheet.
Pressure (within installations,
relative to atmospheric pressure) should be monitored at any monitoring probe
where methane was detected on the previous monitoring occasion. The order of
monitoring should be pressure, followed by flammable gas (CH4), O2,
CO2 and temperature.
Bulk samples of LFG should be
drawn from gas monitoring probes with tubing connected directly to a Tedlar bag of appropriate volume and sent for laboratory
analysis.
Well Head
Proper hoses should be
connected from the GEM-500 or equivalent landfill gas meter to
the wellhead.
Clear rubber hose with the
external filter/water trap assembly should be attached to the static port on
the GEM-500 or equivalent
landfill gas meter .
Male quick connect should be
placed on the end of this tubing to read the static pressure on the wellhead.
Clear rubber hose should be
connected to the impact port of the GEM-500 or equivalent landfill gas meter
. A male fitting should be placed on the end of the clear tubing.
This fitting should be used to measure the impact pressure at the wellhead.
Gas analyser should be turned
on and gas should be sampled for 60 seconds.
Results should be recorded on a
log sheet.
Pressure (within installations,
relative to atmospheric pressure) should be monitored at any monitoring probe
where methane, was present on the previous monitoring occasion. The order of
monitoring will be pressure, followed by flammable gas (CH4), O2,
CO2, and temperature.
Bulk samples of LFG should be
drawn from gas monitoring probes with tubing connected directly to a Tedlar bag of appropriate volume and sent for laboratory
analysis.
Site Building and Confined Space
Permanent gas detection system
should be installed at each on-site building for the continuous and automatic
monitoring of gas ingress into the building.
The effectiveness of the system
will further be monitored by inspection of main gas detector panel every 4
hours; inspection of air inlets to ensure no blockages, daily; and monitoring
of all maintenance holes, ducts and confined spaces
both inside and within close proximity to the Landfill. Site Boundary for
flammable and carbon dioxide, monthly.
The gas detection system will
be set for alarm (audible and visual) if
Ψ CH4 rises to 20% LEL; or
Ψ CO2 rises to 1.5% by volume; or
Ψ O2 falls to 18% by volume
Off-site Location
VOCs
A sample list of VOC monitoring
parameter is listed in Appendix
D.
Prior to sampling, the sampler
should be attached to the canister by tubing.
The canister valve should be opened and the canister pressure gauge should be recorded.
Ambient air should be pumped
into the canister by the samplers diaphragm pump. The flow rate should be
maintained at about 67mL/min for 3 hours in order to
fill the 6L canister to 2 atm. The system timer should be programmed to
activate and deactivate the sample collection.
After sampling, the canister
valve should be closed and the final sample pressure
should be recorded on the sampling data sheet.
Monitoring for VOCs should not
be carried out if it is raining.
CH4
A sample-collecting air bag should
be situated within an airtight drum. The bag should be opened to the atmosphere
and a vacuum should be applied to the inside of the drum by means of a vacuum
pump. The negative pressure causes the air bag to inflate, drawing in an
atmospheric air sample. The bag should then be sealed immediately.
Sample containers should be labelled
and delivered to the accredited laboratory as soon as is practicable.
The A/L Levels and relevant EAP for LFG detected in
excavation, utilities and enclosed on- site areas are summarised in Table
7.1.
Table
7.1 A/L Levels and EAP for LFG
Parameter |
Level |
Action |
Oxygen (O2) |
Action Level <19%
O2 |
Ventilate trench/void to restore O2 to >19% |
Limit
Level <18% O2 |
Stop
works Evacuate
personnel/prohibit entry Increase
ventilation to restore O2 to >19% |
|
Methane (CH4) |
Action Level >10% LEL* |
Prohibit hot works Increase ventilation to restore CH4 to <10% LEL |
Limit
Level >20% LEL* |
Stop
works Evacuate
personnel/prohibit entry Increase
ventilation to restore CH4 to <10% LEL |
|
Carbon dioxide (CO2) |
Action Level** >0.5%**
CO2 |
Ventilate to restore CO2 to <0.5% |
Limit
Level >1.5% CO2 |
Stop
works Evacuate
personnel / prohibit entry Increase
ventilation to restore CO2 to <0.5% |
* LEL: Lower Explosive Limit -
concentrations in air below which there is not enough fuel to continue an
explosion.
** This Action Level of CO2
at 0.5% is set for reference only, assuming no CO2 emission from a
particular location.
Depending on the baseline CO2
levels, the Action Level at a particular location will be changed.
The protection
and precautionary measures to minimise LFG hazards for the areas within and
outside the landfill extension site during construction, operation, restoration
and aftercare phases are summarised in the EMIS in Appendix
C.
Due to the
close proximity to the existing NENT Landfill site, the mitigation measures
within landfill extension site generally encompass specific protection against
hazards of exposure to LFG e.g. ignition, explosion,
asphyxiation, toxicity, etc when undertaking construction activities including
excavation and trenching.
During
operation, restoration and aftercare phases, due care for strict implementation
protection measures should be taken when operations within service voids,
manholes and inspection chambers need to be exercised within the landfill
extension site. All new-built permanent building structures within the landfill
extension site should be installed with specific gas protection measures.
For new
developments outside the landfill extension site but within the 250m
Consultation Zone, the owner of the development is required to conduct an LFG
hazard assessment and submit the assessment report to the EPD for consultation
and vetting in accordance with ProPECC PN 3/96 and
LFG Guidance Note. The owner of the development should:
Carry out an LFG hazard
assessment to evaluate the degree of risk associated with the proposed development;
Design suitable precautionary/
protection measures to render the proposed development as safe as reasonably practicable;
Ensure that the precautionary/
protection measures to be fully implemented according to the design; and
Establish a maintenance and
monitoring programme to ensure the continued performance of implemented
protection measures.
The EIA study
has recommended landscape and visual mitigation measures to be undertaken
during the construction and operational phases, as well as the restoration and
aftercare phases of the project. This section outlines the EM&A
requirements of these measures to mitigate the landscape and visual impacts.
The design,
implementation and maintenance of landscape mitigation measures should be
checked to ensure that they are fully implemented and that potential conflicts
between the proposed landscape measures and other works and operational
requirements are timely resolved without compromise to the intention of the
proposed mitigation measures.
Baseline
Monitoring
Photographic
records of the project site should be taken at the time when the Contractor
take over the site, which should be approved by the IEC. The approved
photographic records should be submitted to the Project Proponent, ET, IEC and
EPD.
Monitoring
Locations and Frequency
In order to monitor the landscape and
visual impact after providing mitigation measures effectively, all the
specified and affected LCAs, LRs and VSRs should be monitored. Implementation of
the mitigation measures during construction, operation, restoration
and aftercare phases of the Project should be monitored through the regular
site inspection/audit.
Design Phase
The mitigation
measures proposed in the EIA study to mitigate the landscape and visual impacts
should be embodied into the detailed engineering design and landscape design
drawings and contract documents. Designs should be checked to ensure that the
mitigation measures are fully incorporated and that potential conflicts with
civil, geo-technical, structural, drainage, underground utilities and
operational requirements are resolved prior to construction and operation of
the project. The Project Proponent should develop a detailed management
programme to mitigate the landscape and visual impacts.
Construction
and Operational Phases
Measures to
mitigate the landscape and visual impacts during the construction and
operational phases should be checked to ensure compliance with the intended
aims of the measures. The progress of the engineering works should be regularly
reviewed on site to identify the earliest practical opportunities for the
landscape works to be undertaken. The event and action plan for landscape and
visual monitoring during the construction and operational phases is summarised
in Table 8.1.
Restoration
and Aftercare Phases
Measures to
mitigate landscape and visual impacts during the restoration and aftercare
phases should be checked to ensure compliance with the intended aims of the
measures. The success of all planting works intended to mitigate the visual and
landscape impact should be monitored, including long-term maintenance of the
restoration planting works under the detailed management programme. The event
and action plan for landscape and visual monitoring during the restoration and
aftercare phases is summarised in Table 8.2.
Table 8.1 Summary of event
and action plan for landscape and visual monitoring during construction and
operational phases
|
ET |
IEC |
Contractor |
Design checking |
Check final design conforms to the
requirements of EP and prepare report |
Check report Recommend remedial design if necessary |
Ensure compliance with EP requirements |
Exceedance
on one
occasion |
Identify source of impact Inform IEC and Contractor Discuss remedial actions with IEC and Contractor Ensure remedial actions are properly implemented Monitor remedial actions until rectification has
been completed |
Check report Check Contractor's working method Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial
measures Review proposals on remedial measures Check implementation of remedial measures |
Propose remedial measures Amend working methods Rectify damage and undertake any necessary
replacement |
Repeated Exceedance(s) |
Identify source of impact Inform IEC and Contractor Increase monitoring frequency Discuss remedial actions with IEC and
Contractor Monitor remedial actions until
rectification has been completed If exceedance stops, cease additional
monitoring |
Check monitoring report Check Contractor's working method Discuss with ET and Contractor on
possible remedial measures Review proposals on remedial measures Check implementation of remedial
measures |
Propose remedial measures Amend working methods Rectify damage and undertake any
necessary replacement |
Table 8.2 Summary of event and action
plan for landscape and visual monitoring during restoration and aftercare
phases
|
Maintenance
Agency |
Management
Agency |
Exceedance |
Identify source of
impact Discuss remedial
actions with Management Agency Monitor remedial
actions until rectification has been completed. |
Check report Discuss with
Maintenance Agency possible remedial measures Supervise
implementation of remedial measures |
The EIA study
has recommended the built heritage mitigation measures arising from the NENT Landfill
Extension project. This section outlines the specific EM&A requirements of
these measures.
Details of the
EM&A programme for impacted cultural heritage resources will be provided in
this section, with the full methodology for the recording and preparation of
the archives for both the cultural landscape features (boulder paths and
boulder terraces) and the graves being summarised (Figure
9.1). The resources listed below should be preserved by detailed
record. It is the responsibility of the Contractor that all mitigation
recommendations are fully implemented and the results agreed
by EPD with the advice from relevant authorities.
According to
the approved EIA Report (AEIAR-111/2007) and Environmental Monitoring and Audit
Manual approved in 2007, no archaeological material or cultural layers were identified.
And it should be noted that site of abandoned graves will require no mitigation
measures and that the study area is extremely overgrown with dense ground
covering vegetation and the potential for the presence of more historical
graves exists. As a result, it is recommended that whenever a grave is found
during the construction phase, the relevant authorities should be contacted
immediately and the works in the immediate vicinity of the grave should be
stopped until it is inspected by the relevant authorities.
Boulder Path 1
The southern section of the path
should be surveyed and mapped to determine if any sections of the path will
fall within the extension boundary of the finalised layout plan. If any
sections are found to be within the extension boundary
then preservation by detailed record should be undertaken and fulfill the relevant requirements.
Graves
G2, G4, G5, G6, G7, G8, G14, G15, G25,
G26 and G27 should be preserved by detailed record to fulfil the relevant requirements.
Boulder Path 2
The southern section of the path
should be surveyed and mapped to determine if any sections of the path fall
within the extension boundary of the finalised layout plan. If any sections are
found to be within the extension boundary then
preservation by detailed record should be undertaken to fulfil the relevant requirements.
Graves
1.
The requirement for the
recording of grave inscriptions should include rubbing of grave inscriptions to
be conducted, the inscriptions to be rewritten in a tabular format with proper
cross-referencing (e.g. item numbers, photos).
2.
The requirements for the
cartographic survey of historic graves should include:
The following plans are
required:
Ψ Site plans showing the relative locations of the graves and their
associated cultural/fung shui landscape (if any)
concerned to 1:100 or as appropriate;
Ψ Plan(s) showing all structural walls and built-in fittings to 1:50;
Ψ Elevations of each face of the graves to 1:50;
Ψ At least two cross sections through the graves showing the
architectural characters of the graves to 1:50;
Ψ Architectural details including decorations on the stone head,
spirit stone tablet, chimneys, inscriptions and couplets, plaster decoration
and ornamental features, mouldings, brick construction patterns and any other
items of historical or conservation interest to scale 1:10 or 1:5;
Ψ Plan, elevation and cross section of any important fittings within/
surrounding the graves, particularly relating to its ceremonial use, to
appropriate scale;
Ψ Construction details should be noted such as types of brick bonding,
joints in granite features, etc, to scale 1:10 or as appropriate;
Ψ The number of courses of brickwork to each wall should be recorded
on the appropriate drawings;
Ψ All the plans (apart from details) should have North point.
Drawings should be annotated
with descriptions of the building materials used in the construction of the
principal elements.
A full set of the cartographic
records has to be submitted to the relevant
authorities on or before the date mutually agreed.
3.
The requirements for
photographic survey of historic graves should include:
All the photographic recording
should be done in both colour slides and negatives. The following recordings
are required:
Ψ The historic grave, its associated structures and their immediate
surrounding environment including important trees, types of paving, and
villages concerned etc. Aerial-photos in oblique angles showing the characteristics
of the site such as the associated cultural/ fung
shui landscape are required.
Ψ Details of the graves with the following shots:
(a)
Identification picture
including the surrounding area;
(b)
General views of the graves
from all sides, including the top;
(c)
Oblique view of the graves; and
(d)
Close up of the important
details including calligraphy, e.g. decorations on the
stone head, spirit stone tablet, paving, inscriptions and couplets, plaster
decoration and ornamented features, mouldings, brick construction patterns, and
any other items of historical or conservation interest.
All the photos (size in 5 x
7) captioned in both Chinese and English, and easily referenced to their
location on key drawings and should be numbered and cross-referenced for easy
retrieval and duplication.
A full set of photographic
records should be submitted to the relevant authorities or before the date
mutually agreed for inclusion in the photographic archive of the relevant
authorities.
4.
Format of the detailed survey
of graves to be agreed with the relevant authorities before the commencement of
the recording.
Cultural Landscape Features
1.
The requirements for
cartographic survey of section of boulder paths to be directly impacted by
project should be included:
The following plans are
required:
Ψ Site plans showing the relative locations of the path to 1:1000 or
as appropriate;
Ψ Plan(s) showing all structural elements to 1:50;
Ψ All the plans (apart from details) should have North point.
Drawings should be annotated
with written descriptions of the recorded features.
A full set of cartographic
records should be submitted to the relevant authorities on or before the date
mutually agreed.
2.
The requirements for
photographic survey of boulder paths should include:
All the photographic recording
should be done in both colour photographs and negatives. The following
recordings are required:
Ψ General views of the boulder path, including its immediate
surrounding environment.
Ψ Details of the boulder path with the following shots:
(a)
Identification picture;
(b)
Views of the boulder path from
all sides, including the top.
All the photos (size in 5 x
7) and slides should be properly captioned in both Chinese and English, and
easily referenced to their location on key drawings and should be numbered and
cross-referenced for easy retrieval and duplication.
A full set of the photographic
records should be submitted to the relevant authorities on or before the date
mutually agreed for inclusion in the photographic archive of the relevant
authorities.
The EIA
stipulated that ecological monitoring should be undertaken throughout the
design, construction, operation, restoration and
aftercare phases of NENT Landfill Extension to ensure that all mitigation
measures should be fully complied with. The objectives of design audit for
ecology are to ensure that the design for ecological mitigation specified in
the EIA Report will be conducted to ensure that such designs are ecologically
feasible and effective.
The EM&A
objectives for ecology during the construction, operation and restoration
should be to ensure that the ecological contract works
and construction mitigation procedures recommended are carried out as specified
and are effective. The construction and operational phase ecological EM&A
should be carried out as part of the overall EM&A programme.
The purposes of
ecological monitoring and audit are:
To verify the accuracy of the
predictions of the ecological assessment study;
To detect unpredicted
ecological impacts arising from the proposed project;
To monitor the effectiveness of
the mitigation measures; and
To recommend action plans in
response to unpredicted impacts, and/ or failed mitigation.
The performance
of monitoring and audit from an ecological prospective
should be integrated with the overall monitoring and audit plan for the project
as a whole. The information on the commencement and programme of the
engineering works should enable the ecological monitoring to be prepared with considerations
of seasonality factors.
Mitigation
measures required for the Project to minimise ecological impacts and to
preserve ecological resources will be specified in the Further Environmental
Permit FEP-01/292/2007. Ecological mitigation measures to be implemented during
the construction phase and operation phase include the following:
Transplantation of three plant
species of conservation interest within the project area prior to site
clearance. They are Aquilaria sinensis,
Cibotium barometz, and Bottlebrush Orchid Goodyera Procera and Compensation the
plant species of Endospermum
chinense. Their locations are shown in Figure 10.1.
Translocation on the endemic
freshwater crab Somanniathelphusa zanklon
affected by the Project area and monitoring requirements on the establishment
of the Somanniathelphusa zanklon
community in the translocated site.
Regular site audit and good
site practices to avoid encroachment onto the nearby natural habitats and
disturbance to wildlife. These are listed in various sections (including air,
water, noise, waste sections) of the EIA and the other sections of this Updated
EM&A Manual.
Ecological
mitigation measures to be implemented during the restoration and aftercare
phases should include woodland compensatory planting and monitoring. The
objective of compensatory planting is to mitigate for vegetation loss. The
ratio of compensation, species composition, and schedule of planting should
follow the mitigation measures specified in Section 8 of the EIA Report, approved
detailed vegetation surveys and transplantation proposal and landscape plan to be
submitted within six months after the commencement of construction of the
Project in accordance with condition 2.11 of FEP.
To ensure the
survival and establishment of the compensatory planting, a 10
year ecological monitoring extending to the aftercare phase, i.e. year
2035-2044, is proposed. Apart from the standard practices and regular
maintenance covered by the landscape contract, monitoring of survival, height,
health condition of species planted will be monitored.
Good site practices should be implemented
to avoid encroachment onto the nearby natural habitats and disturbance to
wildlife. Examples are detailed in various sections of the EIA report and
include:
Placement of equipment or stockpile in designated works areas and
access routes selected on existing disturbed land to minimise disturbance to
natural habitats.
Restriction of construction activities to the work areas that would
be clearly demarcated.
Reinstatement of the work areas immediately after completion of the
works.
Only well-maintained plant should be operated on-site
and plant should be serviced regularly during the construction programme.
Machines and plant (such as trucks, cranes) that may be in
intermittent use should be shut down between work periods or should be
throttled down to a minimum.
Plant known to emit noise strongly in one direction, where possible,
be orientated so that the noise is directed away from nearby NSRs.
Silencers or mufflers on construction equipment should be properly
fitted and maintained during the construction works.
Mobile plant should be sited as far away from NSRs as possible and
practicable.
Material stockpiles, site office and other structures should be
effectively utilised, where practicable, to screen noise from on-site
construction activities.
Use of quiet plant and working methods.
Construction phase mitigation measures in the Practice Note for
Professional Persons on Construction Site Drainage.
Design and set up of the temporary on-site drainage system will be
undertaken by the Contractor prior to the commencement of construction.
Design and incorporation of silt/sediment traps in the permanent
drainage channels to enhance deposition rates and regular removal of reposited
silt and grit.
Minimization of surface excavation works during the rainy seasons
(April to September), and in particular, control of
silty surface runoff during storm events, especially for areas located near
steep slopes.
Regular inspection and maintenance of all drainage facilities and
erosion and sediment control structures to ensure proper and
efficient operation at all times and particularly following rainstorms.
Provision of oil interceptors in the drainage system downstream of
any oil/fuel pollution sources.
The ecological monitoring and
audit programme should be implemented as set out in this Updated EM&A
Manual. Two major components should be included and
samples and measurements should be taken as summarised in Table 10.1:
Survey and transplantation of the three plant species of conservation
interest before site clearance; and
10-year ecological
monitoring of compensatory wood land planting during the restoration and
aftercare phases.
Table 10.1 Ecological monitoring and audit requirements
Frequency, Duration and
Response |
|
Transplantation
of plant species of conservation interest before commencement of works |
|
Survey
of plant species of conservation
interest within the Project Area |
Between the months of May and August 2021 |
Transplantation
of tree, shrubs and herbs |
Late wet season or early dry season, i.e., late October to early
November |
Monitoring
of survival and growth of transplanted species |
At least twice a month during the first
three months after transplantation and once a month in the following nine
months. The need for any further monitoring
will be reviewed and determined according to the monitoring results of the 12
- month monitoring. |
Monitoring of
compensated individuals of Endospermum |
Details will be
included in the TPRP. |
Ecological
monitoring of woodland compensatory planting during restoration and aftercare
phases |
|
Monitoring of
survival, growth and health conditions of planted |
A total of 10
years. Quarterly during
the first two years and every six months during the following three years of
Phase 1 on exotic trees. Quarterly during the first
two years and every six months during following three years of Phase 2 on
native trees. The need of any
further monitoring will be reviewed according to the monitoring results after
the 10-year monitoring. |
Survey and Transplantation
of Plant Species
Preparation
work for transplantation of trees and shrubs should be conducted in accordance to DEVB TC(W) No. 4/2020 - Tree Preservation, which
specifies that when tree transplantation is required, the project office should
allow at least 12 months in advance for consultation to obtain approval,
sourcing of receptor location, and preparation works for transplanting
operation.
Prior
to the actual vegetation survey, a preliminary site visit/survey was conducted
to initially survey the transect routes and investigate the locations of
previously recorded plant species of conservation importance. The actual
detailed vegetation survey was conducted after consent of the survey efforts
were sought from Government Representatives (including EPD and AFCD). The
detailed vegetation survey was conducted by direct observation along the
transect routes.
During
the detailed vegetation survey, a total of six nos. of
Incense Tree (three nos. of saplings and three nos. of trees), 23 nos. of Endospermum trees, one individual of Lamb of Tartary, and
about 19 clusters of Bottlebrush Orchid will be directly impacted by the
proposed construction of the NENTX Landfill.
As
a mitigation measure, these plant species of conservation importance are
proposed to be transplanted in suitable receptor sites except for the 3 nos. of
Incense trees, 23 nos. Endospermum trees. One sapling
of Incense tree will not be transplanted nor compensated as it is observed dead
during the additional survey. The rest of the trees were not suitable for
transplantation due to low survival rate after transplantation. These trees
are, instead, proposed to be compensated and the details of the compensatory
planting will be presented in the Tree Preservation and Removal Proposal
(TPRP).
The
recorded Incense Tree saplings, Lamb of Tartary and Bottlebrush Orchids are
proposed to be transplanted. Methodology, implementation programme of the
transplantation and post transplantation maintenance and monitoring are
detailed in the approved detailed vegetation surveys and transplantation
proposal.
Before
the commencement of transplantation, the Contractor should appoint the
qualified ecologist/ botanist (with at least 5 years of relevant experience in
botanical survey) to check if any additional flora species of conservation
importance has been missing out within the accessible area of the Project Site.
As
required in Condition 2.9 of the EP and Condition 2.7 of FEP, the
transplantation works will be carried out before commencement of construction
of the Project. Post-transplantation maintenance and monitoring will commence
immediately after the transplant and be undertaken before the site clearance at
the collection sites.
Ecological Monitoring of Compensatory Woodland
A
qualified ecologist/ botanist who forms a member of ET should review the
detailed design of the compensatory planting in order to
provide details for ecological monitoring scheme. He/ she should oversee the
planting work and conduct subsequent monitoring. The survival and health
condition of individuals of the selected plant species should be monitored over
the 10-years period. Since planting will be conducted in phases in 5 years
where native species will be planted in Years 3 to 5, ecological monitoring
should be conducted by phases to ensure survival of native species.
The
Trigger and Action Levels and Event Action Plan for monitoring of compensatory
woodland planting are defined in Table 10.2.
The
implementation of mitigation measures and ecological works, the Contractor compliance
with environmental requirement, and effectiveness of site mitigation measures
during construction, operation, restoration and
aftercare phases should be monitored and audited as detailed in the EM&A
programme. The details of the ecological monitoring plans should be developed
by the ecologist of the ET and agreed by EPD and AFCD prior to commencement of
construction works.
Table 10.2 Trigger and Action Levels and
Event Action Plan for monitoring of compensatory woodland planting
Parameter |
Trigger and Action Level |
Event Action Plan |
Mortality* |
Trigger Level: >20% of mortality of any sampled planted species or overall
survival. |
If the Trigger Level is exceeded, the ET Leader should inform
the Contractor and IEC immediately. Frequency of monitoring should increase
to closely monitor the survival and results reported to the Contractor. |
|
Action Level: >30% of mortality of any of each transplanted
species. |
If the Trigger Level is exceeded, the ET Leader
should inform all parties (the Contractor, EPD, AFCD and IEC) immediately.
The Contractor should propose alternative plan and work out the solution (e.g. replacement planting) according to the requirements
of EPD and AFCD. Once the solution has been identified and agreed with all
parties, the Contractor should implement the solution. |
* Total defoliation with no
evidence of regeneration (such as presence of leaf buds, stem buds.
All
transplanted individuals will be maintained by the Contractor for 12 months
(establishment period) after planting to the receptors
sites.
Watering
The
transplanted Incense Tree saplings and Lamb of Tartary should be watered daily
at least for the first week post-transplantation. The watering frequency will
be gradually reduced to 2 - 3 times per week throughout the
post-transplantation maintenance period. Watering frequency during the wet
season will be adjusted according to weather conditions and instruction from
the qualified ecologist or botanist.
Fresh
water should be used for watering. Water should be applied using a rose or a
sprinkler and in such a manner that compaction, washout of soil and loosening
of plants will not arise. Direct watering onto the leaves and excessive
watering in soaking the specimens in water should be avoided.
For
the Bottlebrush Orchid, since they will be transplanted to wet areas near or in
the stream bed of the receptor site, watering can be conducted less frequently
and according to the site conditions and instruction from the qualified
ecologist or botanist. However, the orchids should be checked for their health
condition in the same frequency as that for the transplanted Incense Trees and
Lamb of Tartary.
Pruning, Weeding and Pest
Control
Regular
weeding and pest control should be implemented during the post-transplantation
maintenance period. Any unwanted weeds (such as Mikania micrantha) found in the receptor sites should be removed by
the Contractor once identified or when instructed by the qualified ecologist or
botanist. Manual weeding should be conducted to prevent accidental damage to
the transplanted individuals.
The
Contractor should regularly check for any insect attack or fungal infestation
during the regular maintenance and monitoring events. Application of chemicals
as pest control should be avoided, as far as practicable. Minor infestations
found on the transplanted specimens should be removed manually or with soapy
water.
Pruning
may be carried out, if necessary, after transplantation to remove any broken or
insect/fungal infested stems of the transplanted individuals.
All
weeds and rubbish resulting from the weeding and other maintenance activities
should be disposed of by the Contractor.
Fertilization
The
need of fertilization will be determined by the qualified Ecologist/ Botanist
in view of the latest growth performance of the transplanted specimens. For the
Bottlebrush Orchid, if fertilization is considered necessary, it is preferred
to use orchid fertiliser as the standard fertiliser for horticultural use may
burn the roots of the orchids.
The
survival and growth of the transplanted species will be monitored by a
qualified ecologist or botanist at least twice a month during the first three
months after transplantation and once a month in the following nine months. The
need for any further monitoring will be reviewed and determined according to
the monitoring results of the 12-month monitoring.
The
monitoring parameters will include but are not limited to health condition,
survival, and growth performance of each of the transplanted
individuals/clusters. Photographic records of the transplanted individuals will
be undertaken for each monitoring event.
Moreover,
during construction, operation, restoration and aftercare phases, routine site
inspection will be conducted on a weekly basis to audit the mitigation measures
on disturbance on habitat adjacent to the work areas. Monitoring of
transplantation will be audited as part of the site audit programme.
The
monitoring of the compensated individuals of Endospermum
will be over the 10-year period under the ecological monitoring of compensatory
woodland. Detailed monitoring
requirements will be presented in the approved TPRP. The approved TPRP will be
submitted to EPD and AFCD for record.
Reporting
Monitoring
results from each monitoring event will be reported to the Project Proponent on a monthly basis throughout the post-transplantation
maintenance and monitoring period for a period of 12 months. Monthly Reports
should include the following information. The first monthly report will also
include transplanting details, including but not limited to an update
description of the physical environment of the receptor site, health conditions
and photos of the transplanted species.
Date(s) of monitoring and maintenance implementation of the reporting
month;
Key findings of the post-transplantation monitoring, including but
not limited to photographic records of the transplanted plants of conservation
importance at the receptor site(s) and conditions of the transplanted plants
(see Appendix
E
for a sample data sheet);
Recommendation on post-transplantation maintenance; and
Key maintenance activities conducted in the reporting month.
As required in FEP condition 2.8 and
the EIA Report Approval Condition No. 4, monitoring on the endemic freshwater
crab Somanniathelphusa zanklon shall
be carried out according to the submission approved under FEP condition 2.6
before commencement of construction of the Project.
Particularly, the EIA Report Approval
Condition No.4 requires post-translocation monitoring activities to monitor the
establishment and effectiveness of the measures given to the endemic S. zanklon
community in the translocated site.
The post-translocation monitoring will
be conducted by qualified ecologists using the mark-recapture method.
Mark-recapture method is a tool for conservation measures where animals are
marked and detected later by capture or sighting. The method can used to
estimate population size and survival rates of the translocated S. zanklon
individuals in the recipient site.
For the monitoring frequency, the
post-translocation monitoring will be conducted once a month (at night-time)
for the first 3 months after the translocation activities, and then will be
done quarterly after the third month for one year. This is to ensure that only
minimal disturbance will be created to the newly establishing translocated S. zanklon
community in the recipient site.
Reporting
During the
translocation works, a data sheet will be used for recording and reporting the
data and findings of the translocation survey activities. Updated descriptions
of the physical environment of the capture and recipient sites, data; and
photos of the collected S. zanklon will be included in the Detailed Translocation
Report to be submitted to EPD and AFCD within 14 working days upon completion
of the capture-translocation activities.
Site inspection
provides a direct means to initiate and enforce the specified environmental
protection and pollution control measures. These should be undertaken routinely
to inspect construction activities to ensure these measures are implemented
properly. Site inspection is one of the most effective tools to enforce the
environmental requirements on-site.
The ET Leader
should be responsible to formulate the environmental site inspection
requirements, deficiency and action reporting system,
and to conduct the site inspection works. Within 21 days of the commencement of
construction works, the ET Leader should submit a proposal for site inspection
and deficiency and action reporting procedures to the Contractor for agreement
and the IEC for approval. The ETs proposal for rectification should be made
known to the IEC.
Regular site
inspections should be carried out at least once per week. The areas of
inspection should not be limited to the environmental situation, pollution
control and mitigation measures within the site. The inspection should also include
a review of the environmental situations outside the works area which would
likely to be affected, directly or indirectly, by the works activities. The ET
Leader should make reference to the following
information when conducting site inspection:
Recommendations in EIA Report on the environmental protection and
pollution control mitigation measures;
Works progress and programme;
Individual works methodology and proposals, including proposal on the
associated pollution control measures;
Contract specifications on environmental protection requirements;
Relevant environmental protection and pollution control legislation;
and
Previous site inspection results.
The Contractor
should keep the ET Leader updated with all relevant information on the construction
contract necessary to carry out the site inspections. All inspection findings
and associated recommendations for improvements to the environmental protection
and pollution control works should be submitted to the IEC and Contractor
within 24 hours after inspection. The Contractor should follow the procedures
and time-frame as recommended in the site inspection
and the deficiency and action reporting system formulated by the ET Leader to
report on any remedial measures implemented subsequently. Ad-hoc site
inspections should be carried out if significant environmental problems were
identified. Inspections may also be required subsequent to
receipt of environmental complaints or as part of the investigation work as
specified in the EAP for the EM&A programme.
There are
contractual environmental protection and pollution control requirements as well
as environmental protection and pollution control legislation in Hong Kong with
which construction activities should comply. All works method statements
submitted by the Contractor to the IC for approval should be sent to the ET
Leader for review and vetting to ensure sufficient environmental protection and
pollution control measures have been included. The EMIS is included in Appendix C.
The ET Leader should
review the progress and programme of the project works to check that relevant
environmental legislation has not been violated and that any foreseeable
potential for violating the laws should be avoided. The Contractor should
regularly copy the relevant documents to the ET Leader so that proper audit and
checking should be conducted. Such documents should at least include the
updated works progress reports, works programme, correspondences for
application of different environmental licenses/permits under the environmental
protection legislation, and copies of all valid environmental licenses/permits.
Site diary should be available for ET Leader's inspection upon request.
The ET Leader
should advise the IEC and Contractor of any non-compliance and nonconformance
with the contractual and legislative requirements on environmental protection
and pollution control for follow-up action. If the ET Leader's review concluded
that the current status on environmental
license/permit application and environmental protection and pollution control
preparation works may result in potential violation of the specified
requirements, the ET Leader should advise immediately inform the Contractor and
IEC accordingly. Upon receipt of such advice, the Contractor should take immediate
action to rectify the situation. The IEC should follow up with the cases to
ensure that appropriate action has been taken to satisfy contractual and legal
requirements.
All
environmental complaints should be referred to the ET Leader for further
action. The ET Leader should undertake the following procedures upon receipt of
any complaints:
Log the complaint and date of receipt into the complaint database and
inform the IEC immediately;
Investigate the complaint to determine its validity and assess
whether the source of problem would be due to the project works activities;
Identify the mitigation measures in consultation with the IEC if the
complaint was valid and due to the project works;
Advise the Contractor if further mitigation measures were required;
Review the Contractor's response to the identified complaint,
mitigation measures and updated situation;
If the complaint was transferred from the EPD, submit the interim
report to the EPD on the status of the complaint investigation and follow-up
action within the time frame as assigned by the EPD;
Conduct additional monitoring and audit to verify the situation if
necessary and review the circumstances leading to the complaint to avoid no recurrence;
Report the investigation findings and subsequent action to the
complainant. If the source of complaint was originated from the EPD, the
findings should be reported within the timeframe as assigned by the EPD; and
Record the environmental complaint, investigation, subsequent action
taken and investigation findings in the monthly EM&A reports.
Reports should
be provided in an electronic medium upon agreement of the format for submission
to the EPD. All the monitoring data (baseline and impact) should also be submitted
on diskettes or other agreed media. The formats of monitoring data to be
submitted should be separately agreed. The types of reports that the ET Leader
should prepare and submit include Baseline Monitoring Report, Monthly EM&A
Reports, Quarterly EM&A Summary Report, Annual EM&A Review Report, and
Final EM&A Review Report during the completion and cessation of each
project phases.
The ET Leader
should prepare and submit a Baseline Environmental Monitoring Report within four
weeks before the commencement of construction and before the commencement of operation.
Baseline Environmental Monitoring Report should be certified by the ET and
verified by the IEC. Additional copies of the Baseline Monitoring Report shall
be provided upon request by the EPD. The Baseline Monitoring Report should
include at least the following:
Up to half a page executive summary;
Brief project background;
Drawings showing baseline monitoring locations;
Monitoring results (both hard and soft copies) together with: monitoring methodology, name of laboratory and types
of equipment used and calibration details, parameters monitored, monitoring
locations, date, time, frequency and duration, and quality assurance (QA) /
quality control (QC) results and detection limits;
Details of influencing factors including major activities being
carried out on-site, weather conditions and other factors during the monitoring
period which might affect results;
Determination of the Action and Limit Levels for each monitoring
parameter and statistical analysis of the baseline data, the analysis should
conclude if there is any significant difference between control and impact
stations for the parameters monitored;
Revisions for inclusion in the Updated EM&A Manual; and
Comments, recommendations and conclusions.
The results and
findings of all phases of EM&A programme should be recorded in the Monthly,
Quarterly, Annual and Final EM&A Reports prepared by the ET. The EM&A
reports should be submitted within 2 weeks after the end of the reporting
month.
Each EM&A
report should be certified by the ET and verified by the IEC before submission
to the EPD. Prior to submission of the first Monthly EM&A Report, the ET
Leader should liaise with all parties for the required number of copies and
format of the report in both hard copy and electronic medium. The ET leader
should also review the number, parameter and location
for impact monitoring on six-monthly basis, or as needed, so as to cater any
changes in the baseline condition and surrounding environment.
First
Monthly EM&A Report
The first Monthly EM&A Report should include at least the
following:
Executive summary (1-2 pages): Exceedances of A/L Levels, complaint
log, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions, reporting changes,
and future key issues;
Brief project information:
Project organisation e.g. key personnel, their contact
names and telephone numbers, project programme, management structure, and works
undertaken during the month;
Environmental performance
status: Works undertaken during the month with illustrations (e.g. location of works, daily excavation rate, etc) and
drawings showing the project area, environmental sensitive receivers and impact
monitoring and control/ reference locations (with co-ordinates);
Brief summary of EM&A
requirements: All monitoring parameters, environmental quality performance
limits (A/L Levels), EAP, environmental mitigation measures as recommended in
the EIA Report, and contractual environmental requirements;
Implementation status of
mitigation measures: Advice on the implementation status of environmental
protection and pollution control/mitigation measures as recommended in EIA Report;
Monitoring results (in both
hard and soft copies) with the following information: Monitoring methodology,
name of laboratory and types of equipment/instrument
deployed and calibration details, parameters monitored, monitoring locations,
date, time, frequency and duration, weather conditions, other factors affecting
the monitoring results, and QA/QC results and detection limits;
Non-compliance, complaints and
notifications of summons and successful prosecutions: Record of all
non-compliance or exceedances of the environmental quality performance limits
(A/L Levels), complaints received (written or verbal) for each media e.g.
locations and nature of complaints investigation, liaison and consultation
undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken, results and summary,
notification of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of current
environmental protection/pollution control legislation, including locations and
nature of the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken, results and
summary, reasons for and the implications of non-compliance, complaints,
summons and prosecutions including review of pollution sources and working
procedures, and description of the actions taken in the event of non-compliance
and deficiency reporting and any follow-up procedures related to earlier
non-compliance; and
Other information: Account of
future key issues as reviewed from the works programme and method statements,
advice on waste management status, and comments on effectiveness and efficiency
of mitigation measures, recommendations on any improvement in the EM&A
programme, and conclusion.
Subsequent
Monthly EM&A Reports
Subsequent
monthly EM&A reports should include the following:
Executive summary (1-2 pages):
Breaches of A/L Levels, complaints log, notifications of summons and successful
prosecutions, reporting changes, and future key issues;
Brief project information:
Project organisation e.g. key personnel, their contact
names and telephone numbers, project programme, management structure, and works
undertaken during the month;
Environmental performance
status: Works undertaken during the month with illustrations (e.g. location of works, daily excavation rate, etc) and drawings
showing the project area, environmental sensitive receivers and impact
monitoring and control/ reference locations (with co-ordinates);
Implementation status of
mitigation measures: Advice on the implementation status of environmental
protection and pollution control/mitigation measures as recommended in EIA Report;
Monitoring results (in both
hard and soft copies) with the following information: Monitoring methodology,
name of laboratory and types of equipment/instrument
deployed and calibration details, parameters monitored, monitoring locations,
date, time, frequency and duration, weather conditions, other factors affecting
the monitoring results, and QA/QC results and detection limits;
Non-compliance, complaints and
notifications of summons and successful prosecutions: Record of all
non-compliance or exceedances of the environmental quality performance limits
(A/L Levels), complaints received (written or verbal) for each media e.g.
locations and nature of complaints investigation, liaison and consultation
undertaken, actions and follow-up procedures taken, results and summary,
notification of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of current
environmental protection/pollution control legislation, including locations and
nature of the breaches, investigation, follow-up actions taken, results and
summary, reasons for and the implications of non-compliance, complaints,
summons and prosecutions including review of pollution sources and working
procedures, and description of the actions taken in the event of non-compliance
and deficiency reporting and follow-up procedures related to earlier
non-compliance;
To summarize the monthly
finding for post-translocation monitoring of the endemic crab and
post-transplantation monitoring of the plant of conservation importance species;
Other information: Account of
future key issues as reviewed from the works programme and method statements,
advice on waste management status, and comments on effectiveness and efficiency
of mitigation measures, recommendations on any improvement in the EM&A
programme, and conclusion of the reporting month; and
Appendix: A/L levels, graphical plots of trends of monitored
parameters at key stations over the past 4 reporting periods for representative
monitoring stations annotated against the major activities being carried out on
site during the period, weather conditions during the period, and any other
factors that might affect the monitoring results, monitoring schedule for the
present and next reporting period, cumulative statistics on complaints,
notifications of summons and successful prosecutions, and outstanding issues
and deficiencies.
Quarterly
EM&A Summary Reports
Quarterly
EM&A Summary Report of around 5 pages should include the following
information:
Executive summary (1-2 pages);
Brief project information
including a synopsis of the project organisation, works programme, contacts of
key personnel of the EM&A programme, and synopsis of works undertaken
during the reporting quarter;
Brief summary of EM&A
requirements e.g. monitoring parameters, environmental
quality performance limits (A/L Levels), and environmental mitigation measures
as recommended in the EIA Report;
Advice on implementation status
of environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures as
recommended in the EIA Report and summarised in the updated EMIS;
Drawings showing the project
area, environmental sensitive receivers and the monitoring and control locations;
Graphical plots of trends in
monitored parameters over the past four months (the last month of the previous
quarter and the reporting quarter) for representative monitoring locations
annotated against: major activities being carried out on-site, weather
conditions, and other factors which might affect the monitoring results during
the reporting quarter;
Advice on the waste management status;
Summary of non-compliance or
exceedances of the environmental quality performance limits (A/L Levels);
Brief review of the reasons for
and implications of the non-compliance, e.g. review of
pollution sources and working procedures;
Summary description of action
taken in the event of non-compliance and follow-up procedures related to any
earlier non-compliances;
Summarised records of all
complaints received (written or verbal) for each media, liaison and
consultation undertaken, follow-up action and procedures taken;
Comments (e.g.
a review of the effectiveness and efficiency of environmental mitigation
measures and performance of the environmental management system of the overall EM&A
programme), recommendations (e.g. improvement in the EM&A programme) and
conclusion for the reporting quarter; and
Project Proponents contacts
and any hotline telephone number for the public to make enquiries.
Annual
EM&A Review Reports
The Annual EM&A
Report should include at least the following information:
Executive summary (1-2 pages);
Drawings showing the project
area, environmental sensitive receivers and monitoring and control locations;
Brief project information
including a synopsis of the project organisation, contacts of key personnel of
the EM&A programme, and synopsis of work undertaken during the past 12 months;
Brief summary of EM&A
requirements e.g. environmental mitigation measures as
recommended in the EIA Report, environmental impact hypotheses tested,
environmental quality performance limits (A/L Levels), all monitoring
parameters, and EAP;
Summary of the implementation
status of environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures as
recommended in the project EIA Report and summarised in the updated EMIS;
Graphical plots and statistical
analysis of the trends of monitored parameters annotated against major
activities carried out on-site, weather conditions and other factors which
might affect the monitoring results during the reporting year;
Summary of non-compliance or
exceedances of the environmental quality performance limits (A/L Levels);
Review of the reasons for and
implications of non-compliances including the pollution sources and working
procedures as appropriate;
Description of actions taken in
the event of non-compliances;
Summary record of all
complaints received (written or verbal) for each media, liaison and
consultation undertaken, follow-up action and procedures taken;
Summary record of notifications
of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of the current environmental
protection / pollution control legislation, locations and nature of the
breaches, investigation follow-up actions taken and results;
Review of the validity of EIA
predictions and identification of shortcomings in EIA recommendations, and
Comments (e.g.
a review of the effectiveness and efficiency of environmental mitigation
measures and performance of the environmental management system of the overall
EM&A programme); and
Recommendations and conclusions
(e.g. review of success of the overall EM&A
programme to cost-effectively identify deterioration and to initiate prompt
effective rectification action when necessary) of the reporting year.
Final EM&A Review Report
The Final
EM&A Review Reports should be submitted prior to the completion and cessation
of each project phases including the Construction and Operation, Restoration,
and Aftercare Phases. The report should include at least the following
information:
Executive summary (1-2 pages);
Drawings showing the project
area, environmental sensitive receivers and monitoring and control locations;
Brief project information
including a synopsis of the project organisation, contacts of key personnel of
the EM&A programme, and synopsis of work undertaken during the entire
reporting project phase;
Brief summary of EM&A
requirements e.g. environmental mitigation measures as
recommended in the EIA Report, environmental impact hypotheses tested,
environmental quality performance limits (A/L Levels), all monitoring
parameters, and EAP;
Summary of the implementation
status of environmental protection and pollution control/mitigation measures as
recommended in the project EIA Report and summarised in the updated EMIS;
Graphical plots and statistical
analysis of the trends of monitored parameters annotated against major
activities carried out on-site, weather conditions and other factors which
might affect the monitoring results during the entire reporting project phase;
Summary of non-compliance or
exceedances of the environmental quality performance limits (A/L Levels);
Review of the reasons for and
implications of non-compliances including the pollution sources and working
procedures as appropriate;
Description of actions taken in
the event of non-compliances;
Summary record of all
complaints received (written or verbal) for each media, liaison and
consultation undertaken, follow-up action and procedures taken;
Summary record of notifications
of summons and successful prosecutions for breaches of the current
environmental protection / pollution control legislation, locations and nature
of the breaches, investigation follow-up actions taken and results;
Review of the validity of EIA
predictions and identification of shortcomings in EIA recommendations, and
Comments (e.g.
a review of the effectiveness and efficiency of environmental mitigation
measures and performance of the environmental management system of the overall
EM&A programme); and
Recommendations and conclusions
(e.g. review of success of the overall EM&A
programme to cost-effectively identify deterioration and to initiate prompt
effective rectification action when necessary) of the entire reporting project
phase.
No site-based
documents such as monitoring field records, laboratory analysis records, site
inspection forms, etc should be required to include in the monthly EM&A
reports. However, any such documents should be well kept by the ET Leader ready
for inspection on request. All relevant information should be clearly and
systematically recorded. All monitoring data should also be recorded in electronic
format, with the soft copy readily available on request. The data format should
be agreed with the EPD. All documents and data should be kept for at least 1
year following the project completion.
With reference to the EAP, when the environmental quality
performance limits (i.e. A/L Levels) are exceeded, the
ET Leader should immediately notify the IEC, Project Proponent and EPD, as
appropriate. The notification should be followed up with advice to the IEC and
EPD on the results of the investigation, proposed action and outcome of action
taken, with necessary follow-up proposals.